Advanced Search Results
Dharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kerala
May-31-2005
Civil
Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002
AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332
view, cannot be read in isolation. The same has to be read along with Section 1(3) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. Section 1(3) of the Act states that the Chit Funds Act, 1982 shall come into force on such date … Funds Act registration of a chit shall lapse if the declaration by the Foreman under Sub-section (1) of Section 9 is not filed within three months from the date of such endorsement or within such further period or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKathirvelu Vs. Anbazhagan
Chennai
Mar-12-2008
Civil
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 12; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118; Evidence Act; Tamil Nadu Money-Lenders Act, 1957 - Sections 3(1) and 9
(2008)5MLJ39
note to the appellant as security for prompt payment of future subscriptions. 19. As per Section 12 of Chit Funds Act, 1982, there is prohibition of transacting business other than chit business by a company carrying on chit business without … person holding license shall also run the same in accordance with the terms of such license. As per Section 9 of the said Act, the Money-lender must keep books of accounts and maintain regular records, relating to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Mayavaram Financial Chit Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Narayanan and Two ...
Chennai
Jun-24-1996
Civil
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 64 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Pondicherry Chits Funds Act, 1966
1996(2)CTC170
not maintainable?2. Whether the Court has no jurisdiction to try this suit in view of Section 64 of Chit Funds Act, 1982 and only an arbitration would lie before the Registrar of Arbitration?3. Whether the defendants made number of payments … of the Act deals with the mode of filing such agreement with the Registrar of Chits concerned. Likewise, Section 9 of the Act deals with the commencement of chit which runs as follows:-'Every foreman shall, after all the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Shriram Chits and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Oth ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-13-1993
Commercial
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3, 4, 6(3), 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 21, 25, 48 and 81; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 58A; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Pondicherry Chit Funds Act, 1966; All-India Chit Fund Act; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45I; Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Act, 1971; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1961; Kerala Chitties Act, 1975; Hyderabad Money Lenders Act - Sections 9(2); Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Rules, 1984 - Rule 62
AIR1993SC2063; [1994]79CompCas298(SC); (1994)2CompLJ430(SC); JT1993(4)SC399; 1993(3)SCALE125; 1993Supp(4)SCC226; [1993]Supp1SCR54
Writ Petition Nos.19321/86, 17110/84, etc.2. The above appeals and writ petitions involve challenge to constitutional validity of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (Central Act No.40 of 1982) (hereinafter called as 'the Act' or 'the impugned Act').3. The various appellants/petitioners are … chit fund organisation and where the District Judge had dismissed the suit for want of a licence under Section 9(2) of the Hyderabad Money Lenders Act (Act V of 1349 F.) and on revision, the question that came
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe D.C.i.T. Vs. Mangal Dayak Chit Fund (P) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Aug-31-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)92ITD258(Hyd.)
of the case are as follows.3.2 All these assessees are Chit Fund Companies. They are governed by the Chit Funds Act 1982 and the A.P. Chit Funds Act 1971 and the Rules formed there under. The assessees have filed their … matter before us.3.1 The sole issue arising for adjudication in these appeals is whether the penalty levied under Section 271 B by the Assessing Officer, in the case of a Chit Fund Company; on the ground that … the case of Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax V. Hasmukh M.Shah (85 ITD 99) as well as the CBDT Circular No. 452. He further argued that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala and ors. Vs. Ms. Mar Appraem Kuri Co.Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-08-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 254(1); Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 - Section 15; Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 - Article 254(1), Section 1(3), 85(a), 90(2); The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 ; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 104 of 1976 ; Central Act - Section 20; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6 ; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952
challenged the vires of Section 4(1a) of the 1975 Act as repugnant under Article 254(1) to the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982. Questions to be answered7. Whether making of the law or its commencement brings about repugnancy or inconsistency as … Funds Act registration of a chit shall lapse if the declaration by the Foreman under Sub-section (1) of Section 9 is not filed within three months from the date of such endorsement or within such further period or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.Periyasamy Vs. Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Pvt. Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-27-2013
Land Acquisition
has repaid the chit amount for about 14 installments. Thereafter, the petitioner has committed default. Hence, under the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the matter has been referred to the Deputy Registrar of Chits. Notice has been issued to the petitioner. … was 37/2007 and the chit agreement was No.30/2007. The group number was 91002. Monthly installment of sum of Rs.62,500/- for 40 installments, amounting to Rs.25 … R Being aggrieved by the order made in Ar.O.P.No.20 of 2011 dated 04.08.2012, rejecting an application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the award passed by Chits Arbitrator Deputy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSree Visalam Chit Funds Limited Vs. Mrs. S. Suguna and Others
Karnataka
Feb-05-2001
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 64(3) and 85
AIR2001Kant251; ILR2001KAR1524; 2001(4)KarLJ226
suit and the suit filed is also not maintainable as it is barred under Section 64(3) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (for short 'the Act').2. In this appeal, the point that arises for consideration is.-'Whether the Trial Court is … case of the plaintiff is that the value of the chit is Rs. 50,000/- and it commenced on 9-12-1982. The defendants resisted the suit. On the basis of pleadings the Trial Court has framed certain issues. Ultimately,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Leela M Vs. M/s Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co P Ltd
Karnataka
May-20-2021
Land Acquisition
-8- iv) The alleged chit transactions were contrary to Sections 6, 7, 10, 32 and 33 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 and Section 25 of the Madras Chit Funds Act, 1961, Rules 64 and 65 of the Chit Funds … State of J & K. xii) (2011) 11 SCC524(State Bank of Travancore Vs. Kingston Computers India Pvt. Ltd.) 9. Per contra, Shri Shivaprasad E., learned counsel for the respondent opposes the petitions on the following grounds: i)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Jayamma G Vs. M/s Sree Gokulam Chit And Finance Co (p) Ltd
Karnataka
May-20-2021
Land Acquisition
-8- iv) The alleged chit transactions were contrary to Sections 6, 7, 10, 32 and 33 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 and Section 25 of the Madras Chit Funds Act, 1961, Rules 64 and 65 of the Chit Funds … State of J & K. xii) (2011) 11 SCC524(State Bank of Travancore Vs. Kingston Computers India Pvt. Ltd.) 9. Per contra, Shri Shivaprasad E., learned counsel for the respondent opposes the petitions on the following grounds: i)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »