Advanced Search Results

Soudambika Finance Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore and Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 4(3), 5, 6(1, 2 and 3), 7(2), 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16(2 and 3), 17(2), 18(4 and 5), 19, 20(1), 21, 22(2), 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 39(2), 48(1), 50, 64, 75, 76, 77 and 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 245 and 246; Chit Funds (Pondicherry) Rules, 1986; Pondicherry Chit Funds Act, 1966; Chitties Act, 1964; Cochin Kuris Regulations, 1932; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45-N and 451; Tamil Nadu Chit Fund Rules, 1984 - Rules 4A, 13, 18(4 and 5), 28, 31 and 63; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 39(2) and 48; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1993Mad190; [1995]82CompCas302(Mad)

considered and dealt with in common.2. The above writ petitions involve challenge to the constitutional validity of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (Central Act 40 of 1982), hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' and the Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Rules, … to be unreasonable and insufficient. So far as Ss. 76, 77 and 79 are concerned the learned counsel contended that the penalties provided are too … provided for. Accordingly, a new Cl. 77 was added. These clauses in the Bill correspond to the respective sections in the Act. The other amendments proposed by the Committee are of a clarificatory nature and are only

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Ms. Mar Appraem Kuri Co.Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 254(1); Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 - Section 15; Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 - Article 254(1), Section 1(3), 85(a), 90(2); The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 ; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 104 of 1976 ; Central Act - Section 20; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6 ; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952

challenged the vires of Section 4(1a) of the 1975 Act as repugnant under Article 254(1) to the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982. Questions to be answered7. Whether making of the law or its commencement brings about repugnancy or inconsistency as … on law-making by the respective Legislatures. Broadly speaking, law-making is exclusively the function of the Legislatures (see Articles 79 and 168). The President and the Governor are a part of the Union or the Legislatures of the

The Mayavaram Financial Chit Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Narayanan and Two ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 64 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Pondicherry Chits Funds Act, 1966

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC170

not maintainable?2. Whether the Court has no jurisdiction to try this suit in view of Section 64 of Chit Funds Act, 1982 and only an arbitration would lie before the Registrar of Arbitration?3. Whether the defendants made number of payments … ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. Two judgments in O.S. Nos. 78 and 79 of 1991 rendered by the learned First Additional Sub Judge, Pondicherry on 1.12.1992 disposing of the suits on

Shabeer Shajahan vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Act, it does not mean that the law has not been made. In the present case, the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982 is a law - made. The Chit Funds Bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament and received … Teachers'Education Act, 1993 ('NCTE Act', for short). Under the said Act, National Council for Technical Education, established under Section 3(1), is the W.P.(C).No.23714/2019 5 only authority to prescribe minimum qualification for a person to be employed as … stand together. [See: Zaverbhai Amaidas v. State of Bombay (1955 1 SCR 799), M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India (1979 3 SCR 254) and T.

Mar Appraem Kuri Company Ltd. Vs. Tomy and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 4

Reported in : [1999]96CompCas718(Ker)

was raised by the defendants/respondents that the plaint chitty was started in Bangalore and, therefore, only the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982, is applicable (which came into force on January 2, 1984). But, to conduct the above-said two chitties no … to conduct the above-said two chitties no sanction was accorded nor had they been registered in accordance with Section 4 of the Central Chit Funds Act and, therefore, the plaintiff kuri transaction is illegal. Yet another contention … (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 2063 ; [1994] 79 Comp Cas 298. Despite the above facts and also the decisions of

Gowthaman, Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Ccb

Court : Chennai

316(5), 318(4), 61(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4(1), 76(1), 22, 24 & 79 of Chit Fund Act, 1982, in Crime No. 21 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. … 318(4), 61(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4(1), 76(1), 22, 24 & 79 of Chit Fund Act, 1982, in Crime No. 21 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case

PAVUNRAJ Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Ccb

Court : Chennai

316(5), 318(4), 61(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4(1), 76(1), 22, 24 & 79 of Chit Fund Act, 1982, in Crime No. 21 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. … 318(4), 61(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4(1), 76(1), 22, 24 & 79 of Chit Fund Act, 1982, in Crime No. 21 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case

State Bank of India Vs. V. Ramakrishnan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

tests enumerated hereinabove, we hold that the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 became void on the making of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 on 19-8-1982, [when it received the assent of the President and got published in the Official Gazette]. as … & ANR. … RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.4553 OF2018JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. The present appeals revolve around whether Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which provides for a moratorium for the limited period mentioned

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

made qua the assent. A passing reference at this stage may also be made of the decision Subodh Chit Fund (P) Limited (Supra), wherein the Apex Court had approved the conclusion of the Madras High Court that … to the contentious issue on quid pro quo and unauthorized creation of funds from the collections and expenses therefrom. According to the petitioners, levy of … In Bihar S.A. Product Marketing Board. v. Shankar Makhana Bhandar (Supra), by the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) Act, 1982, market fee levied, collect or to be levied or collected was sought to be saved from being illegal … of writ petitions register an identical challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 3D, 3E, Clause (ii) and (iii) of Explanation-1 to Section 21 as

State of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of the Constitution, List III Entry 7 pertains to contracts including special forms of contracts. The Parliament enactment, Chit Funds Act, 1982 and State legislature Kerala Chitties Act, 1975, the subject being under concurrent list, in paragraph 27, the Court … produce i.e. limestone, does not change. Hence, limestone is a forest produce. 79. Dolomite is a sedimentary rock. Dolomite is formed by the post depositional … Pradesh, State of Uttarakhand and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by