Advanced Search Results
The D.C.i.T. Vs. Mangal Dayak Chit Fund (P) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Aug-31-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)92ITD258(Hyd.)
of the case are as follows.3.2 All these assessees are Chit Fund Companies. They are governed by the Chit Funds Act 1982 and the A.P. Chit Funds Act 1971 and the Rules formed there under. The assessees have filed their … matter before us.3.1 The sole issue arising for adjudication in these appeals is whether the penalty levied under Section 271 B by the Assessing Officer, in the case of a Chit Fund Company; on the ground that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Mayavaram Financial Chit Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Narayanan and Two ...
Chennai
Jun-24-1996
Civil
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 64 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Pondicherry Chits Funds Act, 1966
1996(2)CTC170
not maintainable?2. Whether the Court has no jurisdiction to try this suit in view of Section 64 of Chit Funds Act, 1982 and only an arbitration would lie before the Registrar of Arbitration?3. Whether the defendants made number of payments … ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. Two judgments in O.S. Nos. 78 and 79 of 1991 rendered by the learned First Additional Sub Judge, Pondicherry on 1.12.1992 disposing of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBilahari Investments (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
Jun-19-2006
Direct Taxation
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 3; Income tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 6(6), 144 and 145; Companies Act
(2007)207CTR(Mad)512; [2007]288ITR39(Mad); (2006)4MLJ1644
of the questions raised in the appeals, a reference to Sections 2(d), 2(g), 2(h) and 2(m) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 is inevitable, which read as follows:2. Definition.- In this Act, unless the context otherwise require,-(d) 'chit amount' means … common questions of law:a) Whether the Income tax Tribunal is right in law particularly in the light of Sections 5 and 145 of the Income tax Act, 1961, in rejecting the method of accounting adopted by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mysore Sales International Limited vs the Inspector General of Registr ...
Karnataka
Aug-06-2025
registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is authorised to do business in Chit Funds as regulatedunder the Chit Funds Act, 1982. It contends that the respondent No.3 had subscribed to a chit in his name as well as in … contends that it initiated recovery proceedings before the Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, -4-Bengaluru in Dispute No.RCS/Chits/1/2014-15 under Section 64 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. The petitioner apprehended that the respondent No.3 may sell the properties
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBilahari Investments (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
Dec-01-2006
Direct Taxation
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5 and 145
(2007)209CTR(Mad)242
of the Chit Funds Act. In view of the non obstante clause found in Section 3 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, namely,3. Act to override other laws, memorandum, articles, etc. - Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...
Guwahati
Sep-12-2008
Civil
made qua the assent. A passing reference at this stage may also be made of the decision Subodh Chit Fund (P) Limited (Supra), wherein the Apex Court had approved the conclusion of the Madras High Court that … to the contentious issue on quid pro quo and unauthorized creation of funds from the collections and expenses therefrom. According to the petitioners, levy of … In Bihar S.A. Product Marketing Board. v. Shankar Makhana Bhandar (Supra), by the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) Act, 1982, market fee levied, collect or to be levied or collected was sought to be saved from being illegal … of writ petitions register an identical challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 3D, 3E, Clause (ii) and (iii) of Explanation-1 to Section 21 as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttaranchal Vs. M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-2017
Right to Information
of the Constitution, List III Entry 7 pertains to contracts including special forms of contracts. The Parliament enactment, Chit Funds Act, 1982 and State legislature Kerala Chitties Act, 1975, the subject being under concurrent list, in paragraph 27, the Court … which do not shed their natural characteristic and are all forest produce. 78. Limestone is expressly mentioned in definition of forest produce, slake lime/quick line/hydrated … Pradesh, State of Uttarakhand and State of Madhya Pradesh is in question. 3. In exercise of power under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as “1927 Act) rules have been framed by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSreepadmanabha Trading Company, vs Kerala State Financial Enterprises ...
Kerala
Sep-29-2022
in spite of the petitioner providing security. Learned Counsel drew attention to Section 31 of the Kerala Chits Fund Act,1982 to contend that the chit amount is liable to be released on furnishing sufficient security. 2.Learned Standing … THE FOLLOWING:JUDGMENTDated this the 29th day of September, 2022 The petitioner, registered partnership firm, had subscribed for certain Chits conducted by the respondent. The petitioner claims that the auctioned amount of Rs.1,12,50,000/- is due to be released,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBest and Crompton Engineering Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator
Chennai
Sep-01-1994
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 44(2), 46, 391, 446, 446(1), 446(2), 456, 458A and 469; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articals 1 and 137
[1995]82CompCas77(Mad)
re [1979] 49 Comp Cas 287 and a decision of the Karnataka High Court in Unico Trading and Chit Funds (India) P. Ltd., v. S. H. Lohati [1982] 52 Comp Cas 340. Each of these decisions is by … 2, 1978. On March 2, 1982, the official liquidator presented an application under section 446(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, praying for a direction to the appellant pay a sum of Rs. 39,561.92 plus interest of Rs. … court in the case of Radhakrishnan (V.) v. P. R. Ramakrishnan [1993] 78 Comp Cas 694. In this case, it is observed as follows (at
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVastava Chit Funds (Private) Ltd. Vs. Madala Benarjee and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-02-2005
Limitation
Companies Act, 1956; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 37; Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Act - Sections 2, 6 and 25(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; Constitution of India
2005(3)ALD881; 2005(3)ALT405; III(2005)BC546
by a learned Single Judge of Madras High Court. The Legislative competence of the Parliament in enacting the Chit Funds Act came up for consideration before the Full Bench of the Apex Court. On scrutiny of plethora of decisions, … the impugned order, which reads as under:'....In view of the decisions of our Hon'ble High Court reported in 1982 (2) ALT 48 (NRC) and : 1992(1)ALT696 (D.B.), the decision reported in AIR 1999 Madras 186, does not … Mad. 186. A learned Single Judge of Madras High Court, sitting under Sec. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, while dealing with Article 37 … herein was declared as the successful bidder, having agreed to forego Rs. 78,530/- and it was confirmed by the plaintiff company. The first respondent herein
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »