Advanced Search Results

S. Venkatachalam Vs. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 12(2); Chit Funds Act, 1982; Chit Funds Rules, 1984

Reported in : [1999]95CompCas589(Mad)

Chit Funds Act, 1982, any party aggrieved by any order passed by the Registrar or the nominee under section 69 of the Act, may within two months from the date of the order or award, appeal to the … against the award of the Deputy Registrar of Chits, an appeal is provided under section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, before the State Government. The petitioner presented the appeal on August 31, 1995. According to the petitioner, the

Shriram Chits (Bangalore) Ltd. Vs. Sri Panchakshari and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 68, 69, 70, 71 and 71(1); Co-operative Credit Societies Act - Sections 42 and 43; Indian Arbitration Act, 1899; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 31, 34, 38, 39, 42 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 6, 10 and 50

Reported in : ILR2006KAR498; 2006(6)KarLJ652

as follows:The petitioner M/s Shriram Chits (Bangalore) Ltd., Hampankatta Branch, Mangalore is a Chit Company registered under the Chit Funds Act, 1982. The subscriber viz., the principal debtor Sri Shyam Bhandary of Uppinangady was a member of the Chit Fund … reads as follows:'71. Money how recovered,-Every order passed by the Registrar or the nominee under Section 68 or Section 69 and every order passed by the State Government in appeal under Section 70 for payment of any money

K.Periyasamy Vs. Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

in sub-section (1) as may appear to be just and convenient." 15.Section 69 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 is extracted hereunder, "Decision of Registrar … has repaid the chit amount for about 14 installments. Thereafter, the petitioner has committed default. Hence, under the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the matter has been referred to the Deputy Registrar of Chits. Notice has been issued to the petitioner. … R Being aggrieved by the order made in Ar.O.P.No.20 of 2011 dated 04.08.2012, rejecting an application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the award passed by Chits Arbitrator Deputy

M/s Margadarsi Chits (k) Pvt. Ltd., Vs. H Srinivas Reddy S/o. H Hanuma ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

amount of Rs.1,74,325/- with costs and interest.2. The said order has been passed under Section 69 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (‘the Act’, for short). Aggrieved by the same, respondent No.1 herein preferred an appeal under Section 70 of

Smt. P Prathiba Vs. M/s. Avenue Super Chits (p) Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

beyond limitation. 1615. The counsel for the appellants brought to notice of this Court Section 71 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 wherein it is clear that every order passed by the Registrar or the nominee under Section 68 or … wherein it is clear that every order passed by the Registrar or the nominee under Section 68 or Section 69 and every order passed by the State Government in appeal under Section 70 for payment of any money

V. Sundarajan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 70; Chit Funds Rules, 1984 - Rules 58 and 59

Reported in : AIR2004Mad277

the order of the 2nd respondent dated 13-9-1994, the petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 before the first respondent. The first respondent without following the provisions, particularly Rule 59 of Chit Funds Rules, … order passed by the Registrar or the nominee or the award of the Registrar or the nominee under Section 69, may, within two months from the date of the order of award, appeal to the State Government.'The language

G.Karunakaran. Vs. the Principal Secretary to Government, Commercial T ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of Indian - Article 226

E.P.4. In these circumstances, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the first respondent under Section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, as there is no provision in the Chit Funds Act to file an application to set aside the

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

made qua the assent. A passing reference at this stage may also be made of the decision Subodh Chit Fund (P) Limited (Supra), wherein the Apex Court had approved the conclusion of the Madras High Court that … to the contentious issue on quid pro quo and unauthorized creation of funds from the collections and expenses therefrom. According to the petitioners, levy of … In Bihar S.A. Product Marketing Board. v. Shankar Makhana Bhandar (Supra), by the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) Act, 1982, market fee levied, collect or to be levied or collected was sought to be saved from being illegal … of writ petitions register an identical challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 3D, 3E, Clause (ii) and (iii) of Explanation-1 to Section 21 as … quotation from Harvard Law Review, Vol. 73, Page 692 was referredto:It is necessary that the legislature should

S.Surendran, vs the Deputy Inspector General of Registration and the C ...

Court : Kerala

25445 OF 2020 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED UNDER SECTION 64 OF THE CHITS FUNDS ACT 1982 BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT ON 25-02-2021 … / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 13199 OF 2023 PETITIONER: S.SURENDRAN, AGED 69 YEARS S/O.SADASHIVAN SOPANAM, DWARAKA NAGAR, KASARAGOD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671121 BY … KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671121 BY ADVS. M.SASINDRAN P.K.SUBHASH RESPONDENTS:1 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND THE CHITTY ARBITRATOR NORTH ZONE, KOZHIKODE RED CROSS ROAD, EASTEND C.H OVER BRIDGE, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 001., PIN

Vijayapuram Chit Fund Vs. M.M. Farook and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 33(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Mad273

the appellant on the ground that the suit is not maintainable in view of Section 4 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. Further the appellant did not issue any notice demanding the money and hence the suit is liable to … grant interim stay subject to such conditions as may be deemed proper including condition of deposit. Even under Section 69 of the Transfer of Property Act, the only remedy of the borrower whose mortgage has invoked Section 69