Advanced Search Results
The D.C.i.T. Vs. Mangal Dayak Chit Fund (P) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Aug-31-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)92ITD258(Hyd.)
Act 1971 and Chit Funds Act 1982 and argued that this decision was per incuriam. He relied on Section 57 of the Indian Evidence Act and submitted that the court shall take judicial notice of all laws in … of the case are as follows.3.2 All these assessees are Chit Fund Companies. They are governed by the Chit Funds Act 1982 and the A.P. Chit Funds Act 1971 and the Rules formed there under. The assessees have filed their
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala and ors. Vs. Ms. Mar Appraem Kuri Co.Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-08-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 254(1); Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 - Section 15; Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 - Article 254(1), Section 1(3), 85(a), 90(2); The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 ; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 104 of 1976 ; Central Act - Section 20; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6 ; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952
challenged the vires of Section 4(1a) of the 1975 Act as repugnant under Article 254(1) to the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982. Questions to be answered7. Whether making of the law or its commencement brings about repugnancy or inconsistency as … and others [1979 All. L.J. 401] in the following circumstances:- The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 being the State Act stood enacted on 13.12.1976; it received the assent of the President on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Mayavaram Financial Chit Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Narayanan and Two ...
Chennai
Jun-24-1996
Civil
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 64 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Pondicherry Chits Funds Act, 1966
1996(2)CTC170
not maintainable?2. Whether the Court has no jurisdiction to try this suit in view of Section 64 of Chit Funds Act, 1982 and only an arbitration would lie before the Registrar of Arbitration?3. Whether the defendants made number of payments … the business of conducting the chit, the bye-laws of which have been registered in my office as No. 57/85 dated 5.8.85 M.C. 2000/213/2,00,000/ renewed on 8.9.86 and 17.11.86,Given under my hand and seal this day of fifteenth
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sriman @ V.Narayanan vs State Rep by Its
Chennai
Apr-21-2025
to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment for offence under Section 420 IPC r/w Section 4 r/w 76 of Chit Funds Act, 1982. A2 was acquitted from all charges. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Principal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.Periyasamy Vs. Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Pvt. Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-27-2013
Land Acquisition
has repaid the chit amount for about 14 installments. Thereafter, the petitioner has committed default. Hence, under the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the matter has been referred to the Deputy Registrar of Chits. Notice has been issued to the petitioner. … comply with the conditions of affixing the court fees specified in Rule 57 for determining the dispute. 18.Rule 50 of the Chit Funds Rules, 1984, … R Being aggrieved by the order made in Ar.O.P.No.20 of 2011 dated 04.08.2012, rejecting an application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the award passed by Chits Arbitrator Deputy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrasiddhi Chit Funds Pvt Ltd., vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Oct-25-2025
FIR IN CRIME NO.39/2017 FOR THE OFFECNES P/U/S. 420 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 76 OF THE CHIT FUNDS ACT, 1982 REGISTERED BY MALLESHWARAM POLICE STATION AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, … BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001.2. SRI. SATHYAPRAKASH S/O SARANGAPANI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO.57, 12TH 'A' CROSS, SINDHI HOSPITAL ROAD, SR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBranch Manager, Margadarsi Chit Fund Limited and anr. Vs. District Con ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-19-2004
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 3(1)
AIR2004AP343; 2004(2)ALD645; 2004(2)ALT822; [2005]123CompCas194(AP)
therefore the Consumer Protection Act would not be applicable. The chit funds are managed and organized under the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (49 of 1982). Before appreciating the arguments we have to refer to certain provisions in the Chit Fund … framing the following question,'Whether a subscriber of a chit fund company falls within the meaning of consumer under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and whether such subscribers can invoke the jurisdiction of the District
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Millennium Kuris Pvt Ltd. vs Najeeb
Kerala
Oct-10-2022
holding that the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of Section 64(3) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the plaintiff has filed the original petition. The respondents are the defendants in the suit.2. When the original … MUNSIFF COURT ,THRISSUR PETITIONER:NEW MILLENNIUM KURIS PVT LTD. MANNADIAR LANE, THRISSUR REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CHARLEY, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. THOLATH JOB, CHEMBUKKAVU DESOM, THRISSUR. BY ADV V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1 NAJEEB, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. POTHACHIPARAMBIL
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Vs. Little Flower Kuries and
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Feb-25-2004
Service Tax
(2005)94ITD162(Coch.)
Explanation I states 'Chit' has the meaning assigned to it in clause (b) of Section 2 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982". Interest Tax Act has not defined what is a 'deposit'. Hence, assessee's representative submitted that the definition given … 31-3-92. Assessee's representative has also produced a copy of the direction of RBI in the form of appendix 57 which deals with Residuary non-banking companies (Reserve Bank) Directions 1987 issued by Reserve Bank of India, Department of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaxworth Realty India Ltd vs Jt Registrar of Coop Societies
Karnataka
Apr-15-2025
respondent No.3, albeit they failed to comply with the mandatory provision stipulated in Section 23(c) of the Chit Fund Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by not producing valid books, records, statements of accounts before … No.3, albeit they failed to comply with the mandatory provision stipulated in Section 23(c) of the Chit Fund Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by not producing valid books, records, statements of accounts before the respondent … the Co-operative Society-respondent No.1 in individual Chit Appeal No.JRB/Chit/Appeal/62/2019-20, 63/2019-20, 56/2019- 20, 57/2019-20 and 64/2019-20 before the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.1369/2021, W.P.No.1455/2021, W.P.No.1360/2021, W.P.No.1424/2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »