Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: chit funds act 1982 section 57 · Page 1 of about 48 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 31 2004

The D.C.i.T. Vs. Mangal Dayak Chit Fund (P) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-31-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92ITD258(Hyd.)

Act 1971 and Chit Funds Act 1982 and argued that this decision was per incuriam. He relied on Section 57 of the Indian Evidence Act and submitted that the court shall take judicial notice of all laws in … of the case are as follows.3.2 All these assessees are Chit Fund Companies. They are governed by the Chit Funds Act 1982 and the A.P. Chit Funds Act 1971 and the Rules formed there under. The assessees have filed their

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2012

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Ms. Mar Appraem Kuri Co.Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 254(1); Kerala Chitties Act 23 of 1975 - Section 15; Central Chit Funds Act 40 of 1982 - Article 254(1), Section 1(3), 85(a), 90(2); The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 ; Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 104 of 1976 ; Central Act - Section 20; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6 ; Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952

challenged the vires of Section 4(1a) of the 1975 Act as repugnant under Article 254(1) to the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982. Questions to be answered7. Whether making of the law or its commencement brings about repugnancy or inconsistency as … and others [1979 All. L.J. 401] in the following circumstances:- The U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act 57 of 1976 being the State Act stood enacted on 13.12.1976; it received the assent of the President on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 1996

The Mayavaram Financial Chit Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Narayanan and Two ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-24-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 64 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Pondicherry Chits Funds Act, 1966

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC170

not maintainable?2. Whether the Court has no jurisdiction to try this suit in view of Section 64 of Chit Funds Act, 1982 and only an arbitration would lie before the Registrar of Arbitration?3. Whether the defendants made number of payments … the business of conducting the chit, the bye-laws of which have been registered in my office as No. 57/85 dated 5.8.85 M.C. 2000/213/2,00,000/ renewed on 8.9.86 and 17.11.86,Given under my hand and seal this day of fifteenth

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2025

Sriman @ V.Narayanan vs State Rep by Its

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-2025

to undergo one month Simple Imprisonment for offence under Section 420 IPC r/w Section 4 r/w 76 of Chit Funds Act, 1982. A2 was acquitted from all charges. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Principal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2013

K.Periyasamy Vs. Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-27-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

has repaid the chit amount for about 14 installments. Thereafter, the petitioner has committed default. Hence, under the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the matter has been referred to the Deputy Registrar of Chits. Notice has been issued to the petitioner. … comply with the conditions of affixing the court fees specified in Rule 57 for determining the dispute. 18.Rule 50 of the Chit Funds Rules, 1984, … R Being aggrieved by the order made in Ar.O.P.No.20 of 2011 dated 04.08.2012, rejecting an application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the award passed by Chits Arbitrator Deputy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2025

Prasiddhi Chit Funds Pvt Ltd., vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-25-2025

FIR IN CRIME NO.39/2017 FOR THE OFFECNES P/U/S. 420 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 76 OF THE CHIT FUNDS ACT, 1982 REGISTERED BY MALLESHWARAM POLICE STATION AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, … BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001.2. SRI. SATHYAPRAKASH S/O SARANGAPANI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO.57, 12TH 'A' CROSS, SINDHI HOSPITAL ROAD, SR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2004

Branch Manager, Margadarsi Chit Fund Limited and anr. Vs. District Con ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-2004

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 3(1)

Reported in : AIR2004AP343; 2004(2)ALD645; 2004(2)ALT822; [2005]123CompCas194(AP)

therefore the Consumer Protection Act would not be applicable. The chit funds are managed and organized under the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (49 of 1982). Before appreciating the arguments we have to refer to certain provisions in the Chit Fund … framing the following question,'Whether a subscriber of a chit fund company falls within the meaning of consumer under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and whether such subscribers can invoke the jurisdiction of the District

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2022

New Millennium Kuris Pvt Ltd. vs Najeeb

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-10-2022

holding that the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of Section 64(3) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, the plaintiff has filed the original petition. The respondents are the defendants in the suit.2. When the original … MUNSIFF COURT ,THRISSUR PETITIONER:NEW MILLENNIUM KURIS PVT LTD. MANNADIAR LANE, THRISSUR REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CHARLEY, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. THOLATH JOB, CHEMBUKKAVU DESOM, THRISSUR. BY ADV V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1 NAJEEB, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. POTHACHIPARAMBIL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2004

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Little Flower Kuries and

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)94ITD162(Coch.)

Explanation I states 'Chit' has the meaning assigned to it in clause (b) of Section 2 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982". Interest Tax Act has not defined what is a 'deposit'. Hence, assessee's representative submitted that the definition given … 31-3-92. Assessee's representative has also produced a copy of the direction of RBI in the form of appendix 57 which deals with Residuary non-banking companies (Reserve Bank) Directions 1987 issued by Reserve Bank of India, Department of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2025

Maxworth Realty India Ltd vs Jt Registrar of Coop Societies

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-15-2025

respondent No.3, albeit they failed to comply with the mandatory provision stipulated in Section 23(c) of the Chit Fund Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by not producing valid books, records, statements of accounts before … No.3, albeit they failed to comply with the mandatory provision stipulated in Section 23(c) of the Chit Fund Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by not producing valid books, records, statements of accounts before the respondent … the Co-operative Society-respondent No.1 in individual Chit Appeal No.JRB/Chit/Appeal/62/2019-20, 63/2019-20, 56/2019- 20, 57/2019-20 and 64/2019-20 before the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.1369/2021, W.P.No.1455/2021, W.P.No.1360/2021, W.P.No.1424/2021

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial