Advanced Search Results

Branch Manager, Margadarsi Chit Fund Limited and anr. Vs. District Con ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 3(1)

Reported in : AIR2004AP343; 2004(2)ALD645; 2004(2)ALT822; [2005]123CompCas194(AP)

therefore the Consumer Protection Act would not be applicable. The chit funds are managed and organized under the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (49 of 1982). Before appreciating the arguments we have to refer to certain provisions in the Chit Fund … framing the following question,'Whether a subscriber of a chit fund company falls within the meaning of consumer under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and whether such subscribers can invoke the jurisdiction of the District

Sree Visalam Chit Funds Ltd., Through Its Manager Vs. T.V. Kumar and 2 ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4 and 19; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 33; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 49

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC284; (1997)IMLJ438

in the suit pronote have been incorporated, as it is a mandatory requirement under Section 33 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. The learned Subordinate Judge has also erred in thinking that the document must be one evidencing past transaction, … promissory note is only payable on demand and that it will not come under the definition of Article 49 (2) of the Indian Stamp Act and as contended by the revision petitioner for determining the issue whether

Sriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 89; Chit Funds Rules, 1984 - Rules 49, 49(1), 49(6), 50 and 50(1) to 50(4)

Reported in : AIR2009Mad68

that the three directions in paragraph-28 of the order are not at all in conformity with the Rule 49 of the Chit Funds Rules, 1984 and the directions also amounted to inserting something into the rules, which … amendment to the very rules themselves, framed in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 89 of the Chit Funds Act. So far as the direction contained in (i) of paragraph-28 of the order is concerned, as observed by

M/S. Shriram Chits and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Oth ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3, 4, 6(3), 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 21, 25, 48 and 81; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 58A; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Pondicherry Chit Funds Act, 1966; All-India Chit Fund Act; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45I; Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Act, 1971; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1961; Kerala Chitties Act, 1975; Hyderabad Money Lenders Act - Sections 9(2); Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Rules, 1984 - Rule 62

Reported in : AIR1993SC2063; [1994]79CompCas298(SC); (1994)2CompLJ430(SC); JT1993(4)SC399; 1993(3)SCALE125; 1993Supp(4)SCC226; [1993]Supp1SCR54

Writ Petition Nos.19321/86, 17110/84, etc.2. The above appeals and writ petitions involve challenge to constitutional validity of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (Central Act No.40 of 1982) (hereinafter called as 'the Act' or 'the impugned Act').3. The various appellants/petitioners are … Limited Companies incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 or proprietary or partnership concerns or individual organisers. According to Section 1(3) of the Act is will come into force on such date as the Central Government may by

S. Venkatachalam Vs. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12 and 12(2); Chit Funds Act, 1982; Chit Funds Rules, 1984

Reported in : [1999]95CompCas589(Mad)

against the award of the Deputy Registrar of Chits, an appeal is provided under section 70 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982, before the State Government. The petitioner presented the appeal on August 31, 1995. According to the petitioner, the … of a dispute under section 64 shall be made in writing to the Registrar in Form XVII. Rule 49 prescribes the procedure for hearing and decision on the dispute. The Registrar after affording opportunity and hearing the

Shabeer Shajahan vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Act, it does not mean that the law has not been made. In the present case, the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982 is a law - made. The Chit Funds Bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament and received … Teachers'Education Act, 1993 ('NCTE Act', for short). Under the said Act, National Council for Technical Education, established under Section 3(1), is the W.P.(C).No.23714/2019 5 only authority to prescribe minimum qualification for a person to be employed as … Court in Bondu Ramaswamy v. Bangalore Development Authority [(2010) 7 SCC 129],W.P.(C).No.23714/2019 49179. The Court has to keep in mind that function ofthese constitutional lists

Rarichan vs Stanworth Chits Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

suit.3. The question whether the Civil Court hasjurisdiction to entertain a suit, falling within the purview of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 is no longer res integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by a Division Bench of … and connected cases, wherein it is held as follows:- “23. In view of the provisions under clause(a) of Section 85 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982,nothing in the Chit Funds Act shall apply in commencement of the … FILE OF II ADDL.SUB JUDGE'S COURT, THRISSUR REVISION PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS: 1 RARICHAN, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. THOMAS, 2 JINI RARICHAN , AGED 46 YEARS, W/O. RARICHAN,

Smt. Parvathi vs Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Karnataka

or supervising, as foreman, agent or in any other capacity, chits as defined in Section 2 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (40 of 1982);(ha) “client” means a person who is engaged in a financial transaction or activity with a … ಅ*ಾX+ =ಣ+ZಸBಾ6ತು, ನಂತರದ-! :15.02.1999, ರಂದು ಈ ಜ0ೕ='ೆ ರೂ.3,24,700/- 'ಗ 'ೆ *ೈಯ\ಕ ಅ*ಾX+, =ಣ+ZಸBಾ6ರುತMೆ. ನಂತರದ-! ¸¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ಸಂGೆH: £ÀCE 499 C¥Áæ« 96 ¢:18.05.1998 gÀAvÉ ಭೂQಾ] ೕನ ಕ ಮ ಂದ ೈ^ಡBಾ6ರುತMೆ.ಭೂQಾ] ೕನ ಕ ಮ ಂದ ೈ^ಟ` ಪ Qಾaತ ಸ*ೆ+

Bobby Chemmanoor Chits Private Limited, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

4th respondent herein to implement the rules framed by the 1st respondent herein as contemplated U/s 87 of Chit Funds Act, 1982. iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction commanding the 4th respondent to … SOUTH, THRISSUR, KERALA-680001, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR AND FORMAN MR. JOJEE M.J. AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. M.L. JOSE, MALIYAMAVU HOUSE, PENNORE P.O., THRISSUR-680552. BY ADVS. SRI.RAJIT … uponExt.P3 communication by implementing the draft rules prepared by the 1st respondent herein, exempting the minor offences under section 76(2) of the act from the purview of limitation imposed under Rule 14(3) in SRO 432/2016 as envisaged

Mr Sahaji P B Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

C.C. 3503/2014 declining to discharge the petitioners in relation to offences punishable under Sections 4 and 76 of Chit Funds Act, 1982 (hereinafter for short referred to as ‘the Act’) and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. 3 2.