Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: chit funds act 1982 section 25 · Page 1 of about 141 results (0.063 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2006

C. Dhanam Vs. A.M. Srinivasan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-2006

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 37 and 113; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1961 - Sections 6, 24 25, 25(1) and 25(2); Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 65; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006Mad210; 2006(2)CTC444; [2007(1)JCR463(Mad)]; (2006)2MLJ275

Ltd. held that Article 37 of the Limitation Act and Sections 24 and 25 of the Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act,1961, would apply and, as such, the date of default is the reckoning date. 12. The other Division Bench … Chit Funds Act,1961, since the chit transaction took place in the year 1982, especially before coming into force of the Central Act.14. Before dealing with … committed or on the date the notice demanding the entire sum is issued as per Sub-section (2) of Section 25 of the Act (iii) Dealing with the said question, the Division Bench would discuss the issue in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1998

The TuticorIn Trading and Credit Corporation Private Ltd., by Its Mana ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-09-1998

Subject : limitation

Acts : Limititation Act, 1982 -- Article 37; Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 25

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC685

the second chit the default was committed on 22.12.1978 and the chit was terminated on 22.1.1979. Notice under Section 25 of the Chits Act was issued by the Foreman on 2.11.1981 and the suit was filed on 8.1.1982. … for the respondent relies on the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court in Sudarsan Chit Fund v. Mrs. Jagadambal : (1982)2MLJ169 . He relies on the observation of the learned Judge in paragraph 13

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1993

M/S. Shriram Chits and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Oth ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-13-1993

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3, 4, 6(3), 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 21, 25, 48 and 81; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 58A; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978; Pondicherry Chit Funds Act, 1966; All-India Chit Fund Act; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45I; Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Act, 1971; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1961; Kerala Chitties Act, 1975; Hyderabad Money Lenders Act - Sections 9(2); Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Rules, 1984 - Rule 62

Reported in : AIR1993SC2063; [1994]79CompCas298(SC); (1994)2CompLJ430(SC); JT1993(4)SC399; 1993(3)SCALE125; 1993Supp(4)SCC226; [1993]Supp1SCR54

Writ Petition Nos.19321/86, 17110/84, etc.2. The above appeals and writ petitions involve challenge to constitutional validity of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (Central Act No.40 of 1982) (hereinafter called as 'the Act' or 'the impugned Act').3. The various appellants/petitioners are … per cent commission. We do not find any thing unreasonable in respect of the commission.40. Again objection to Section 25 is meaningless. This is a normal duty of the foreman which has been converted into a statutory duty.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 31 2005

Dharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-31-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332

view, cannot be read in isolation. The same has to be read along with Section 1(3) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. Section 1(3) of the Act states that the Chit Funds Act, 1982 shall come into force on such date … 23 and 24 deal with the payment of subscribers by non-prized subscribers and the removal of defaulting subscribers. Section 25 prescribes the method by which the amount due to a defaulting subscriber has to be dealt with. Sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2005

Shriram Chits (Bangalore) Ltd. Vs. Sri Panchakshari and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 68, 69, 70, 71 and 71(1); Co-operative Credit Societies Act - Sections 42 and 43; Indian Arbitration Act, 1899; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 31, 34, 38, 39, 42 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 6, 10 and 50

Reported in : ILR2006KAR498; 2006(6)KarLJ652

as follows:The petitioner M/s Shriram Chits (Bangalore) Ltd., Hampankatta Branch, Mangalore is a Chit Company registered under the Chit Funds Act, 1982. The subscriber viz., the principal debtor Sri Shyam Bhandary of Uppinangady was a member of the Chit Fund … to have been submitted to the Joint Registrar of Chits, Mysore Division, Mysore for certification as required under Section 71(a) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. A certificate dated 10.1.2000 was issued by the Joint Registrar of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1999

Dr. Vimala Vs. M/S. Shriman Chits and Investments Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-09-1999

Subject : ArbitrationCommercialCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 47, 66, 71 -- Rule 50 -- Order 21, Rule 21, 43; Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Sections 128; Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 33(1), 64(1), 67; The Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC210

In the counter filed by the respondent, it would be urged that (i) under Section 64(1)(b) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') a surety can be proceeded against for any dispute relating the chit … ORDER1. The above civil revision petition is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 25.10.1995 made in E.A.No. 2899 of 1994 in E.P.No. 2373 of 1993 in A.R.C. No. 907 of 1991 by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2021

Moodalagiriyappa K L Vs. M/s Sree Gokulam Chit And Finance Co (p) Ltd

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-20-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

-8- iv) The alleged chit transactions were contrary to Sections 6, 7, 10, 32 and 33 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 and Section 25 of the Madras Chit Funds Act, 1961, Rules 64 and 65 of the Chit Funds

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2021

Smt. Leela M Vs. M/s Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co P Ltd

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-20-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

-8- iv) The alleged chit transactions were contrary to Sections 6, 7, 10, 32 and 33 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 and Section 25 of the Madras Chit Funds Act, 1961, Rules 64 and 65 of the Chit Funds

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2021

Smt. Jayamma G Vs. M/s Sree Gokulam Chit And Finance Co (p) Ltd

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-20-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

-8- iv) The alleged chit transactions were contrary to Sections 6, 7, 10, 32 and 33 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 and Section 25 of the Madras Chit Funds Act, 1961, Rules 64 and 65 of the Chit Funds

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1991

N. Aruldhas Vs. K. Gopinathan Nair

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-12-1991

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 17, 37 and 75; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 25

Reported in : (1991)IIMLJ337

- time barred - Articles 17, 26, 36, 37 and 75 of Schedule to Limitation Act, 1963 and Chit Funds Act, 1982 - petitioner was prized subscriber and after being successful in bid he executed two promissory notes by way … filed within 3 years of the date of Ex.A.5 notice,is not barred by limitation. Even without relying on Section 25 of the Act,it can be held in this case that the suit is not barred by limitation.As already

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial