Advanced Search Results

Abmica Lamp House Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (int)-i Enforcement and a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5B(1), 6, 7, 12 to 16, 28 to 32, 36 and 38; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live Stock) Markets Act, 1966 - Sections 7; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 14A(1) and 14A(4); Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Central Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD704; 2005(3)ALT190; [2005]142STC551(AP)

collecting the compounding fee on the day of inspection either through payment of cash or through post dated cheques, as illegal, and contrary to the provisions of law as well as the judgments rendered by this Court, … writ petitions are filed by the dealers registered under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 carrying on various businesses, assailing the action of the Vigilance Wing of the Sales Tax Department, and praying … writ petitioners that the petitioners were liable to pay tax under Section 6A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and accordingly, collected … is also the case of the dealer that it obtained licence under Section 7 of the A.P. (Agricultural Produce and Live Stock) Markets Act, 1966

Obg Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. Allan and Others (Respondents)

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Land Acquisition

the law." 97. Parliament has responded with legislation such as the Factors Act 1889, section 4 of the Cheques Act 1957 (which protects a collecting bank against liability for conversion of a cheque to which its customer had no … a tortious act of the defendant maliciously to procure her to do so…" Causing loss by unlawful means 6. The tort of causing loss by unlawful means has a different history. It starts with cases like Garret

Ravi Kandasamy vs a.Veeramani

Court : Chennai

the respondents including the interest at the rate fixed under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Money Lenders Act, 1957; b. pass an order under Section 6 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, 2002, for … entered into a loan agreement dated 09.06.2022 (styled as partnership) with the petitioner. The respondents have taken blank cheques, promissory notes and also bond papers as security for repayment of loan from the petitioner. The principal and

Raghunath Balakrishna Deshpande Vs. Biharilal Krishnaprasad Dave

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(6), 2(22) and 6; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4, 13 and 13(1); Mysore Stamp Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : AIR1972Kant159; AIR1972Mys159

of the Negotiable Instruments Act under the Head 'of notes bills and cheques.' Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act reads as follows:--'4. A 'promissory … Stamp Act, whereas if the document is a bond the same will be governed by the Mysore Stamp Act. 1957. The definition of the expression 'bond' in Section 2(5) of the Indian Stamp Act is similar to the … also answers the definition of the expression 'bond' given in Section 2(6) of the said Act. Relying upon Section 6 of the Indian Stamp Act. Shri Joshi submitted that if the document comes within two or more of

State of Karnataka and anr. Vs. H. Dasappa and Sons (P) Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 12B(3)

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4486; (2008)11VST286(Karn)

Industrial Area, Bangalore, have filed monthly statement of turnover in Form-3 admitting taxable turnover and paid tax through cheques. The cheques for all the months when presented to the Bank were returned back unrealised. Said admitted tax … revenue is before this Court in this revision petition filed under Section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 ('KST Act' for short) interalia calling in question the correctness or otherwise of the order passed by the … the monthly returns during that year was only a sum of Rs. 6, 133, 767/- that to belatedly. Despite these hard facts indicating breach of

Kanyalal Thakurdas, Bankers Vs. the Bombay Cycle Importing Company, Cy ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Reported in : (1972)1MLJ412

Negotiable Instruments Act gives some protection to the banker in the same manner as Section 4 of the Cheques Act, 1957, in England. But this does not provide an absolute immunity to the collecting banker and unless he can … of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It is true D.W. 5, Purushotham Das, agent of Jethanand Thakurdas, and D.W. 6, Thakurdas, partner of Kanyalal Thakurdas, gave evidence that the third defendant in the suits are bankers. But it

Canara Bank Vs. Vijaya Bank

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 131 and 131A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas456(Mad)

section 82 of the Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 .... But today resides in section 4 of the Cheques Act, 1957 ....' 9. Corresponding to said section 82 of the English enactment, section 131 of our Negotiable Instruments Act … Abdul Hadi, J.1. This appeal by the plaintiff-Canara Bank is against the dismissial of its suit O.S. No. 6148 of 1979, on the file of the Fourth Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, claiming a sum of

Kesarichand Jaisukhlal Vs. Shilong Banking Corporation Ltd.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Banking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 82; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 57, 64 and 85; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 63; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45D and 45O

by the defendant. The material facts have not been controverted. It appears that the defendant made over two cheques to the plaintiff bank for a total sum of Rs. 8,800/-. Cheque No. C. D. 0887 was for … 'Mohanlal Jogani Rice and Atta Mills v. Ramlal Onkarmal Firm (S) AIR 1957 Assam 133 that a demand draft is as much a conditional payment … is directed against an order dated 2-5-1955, passed by a Judge of this Court under the Banking Companies Act, adjudging the appellant as a debtor to the Shillong Banking Corporation Limited in liquidation. The claim of the … appears that the Bharati Central Bank obtained an order of moratorium under Section 153 of the Indian Companies Act.Finally on 2-1-1947 they returned the demand … D. 0887 was for a sum of Rs. 600/- and Cheque No. C. D. 0888 for a

Sri K C Chandrashekar Raju vs Sri D Venkatesh

Court : Karnataka

of cheque bearing No.787239 dated 05.05.1994. Towards the balance sale consideration amount, the plaintiff issued ten post dated cheques drawn on Vysysa Bank Limited, St. Marks Road Branch, Bangalore, encashable during the span of six months. However, … parting of the possession, should be read as if a conveyance under Article 5(e) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 (for short, ‘the Stamp Act’) and in that view of the matter, for short stamp duty hit by … OF NOTICE TO R14 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC,PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2009 … MISHRA MAJOR IN AGE NO.C-1, ALSA MANOR, HANNINGTON ROAD CHIET PET, CHENNAI- 64.6. SRI MANDEEP SINGH MAJOR IN AGE M/S KESAR MOTORS J C ROAD,

Muniyamma and ors. Vs. Arathi Cine Enterprises P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155

Reported in : [1992]74CompCas256(Kar); ILR1991KAR527

period and who attested all the transfer forms for share transfers and who ultimately encashed most of the cheques issued by the contesting respondents for the purchase of shares, never entered the witness box, though present in … the point as to the invalidity of the notice dated January 2P, 1957, could well be decided summarily, and the courts below rightly decided to … and the second respondent were the first directors and they are to hold office for life and to act as managing directors alternately for a period of 5 years each, while other directors are to hold office … transfer in question was void, as it contravened the mandatory provisions of Section 108 of the Companies Act ('the Act', for short).(2) The petitioners are … second respondent who owns lands in Sy. No. 68/4 and 68/5 of Nagasetty village (which is part