Advanced Search Results
Chalho Singh Vs. Jharo Singh
Kolkata
May-30-1911
Civil
(1912)ILR39Cal995
the decision of the Judicial Committee is an authority for the proposition that Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act, 1880 is not exhaustive and that a road-cess return may be admissible in evidence as against persons other than
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Pandey Vs. Lala Bhagwati Charan and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-15-1909
Land Acquisition
1Ind.Cas.813
individual by whom or on whose behalf they were filed, being absolutely barred by Section 95 of the Cess Act, 1880 (Bengal Act IX of 1880), and (2) that, apart from the provisions of the section just quoted and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheikh Intaz Alias Romar Bap and ors. Vs. Dina Nath De Sarkar and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-18-1926
Land Acquisition
AIR1926Cal856,96Ind.Cas.72
my opinion, there is no substance in this appeal which must be dismissed. Cess Act (IX B.C. of 1880), Section 95 - Return, admissibility of, at instance of third party. -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chalho Singh and ors. Vs. Jharo Singh and ors.
Kolkata
May-30-1911
Civil
18Ind.Cas.61
the decision of the Judicial Committee is an authority for the proposition that Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act, 1880, is not exhaustive and that a road-cess return may be admissible in evidence as against persons other than
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSewdeo NaraIn Singh Vs. Ajodhya Prosad Singh
Kolkata
Jan-09-1912
CivilTenancy
(1912)ILR39Cal1005
plaintiffs by the defendants in another suit for declaration of title; secondly, because Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act of 1880 does not present a bar to the admission of the road-cess return; and, thirdly, because the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Kumar Das Vs. HaranaraIn Das Alias Dinabandhi Das and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-03-1925
Land Acquisition
AIR1926Cal727,92Ind.Cas.104
appellant must, prevail. Exhibit 2 is a road cess return submitted by the plaintiffs. Section 95 of the Cess Act IX B.C. of 1880 provides that such a return shall not be admissible in favour of the person
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askimrit Chamar Vs. Sridhar Panday and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-29-1911
Land Acquisition
13Ind.Cas.120
been argued that the Road Cess Return is not admissible in evidence under Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act, 1880. That section, however, has no application to the circumstances of the present case. The maker of the document
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohendra NaraIn Singh Vs. Ajodhya Prosad Singh
Kolkata
Jan-09-1912
Land Acquisition
15Ind.Cas.284
plaintiffs by the defendants in another suit for declaration of title; secondly, because Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act of 1880 does not present a bar to the admission of the Road Cess Return; and thirdly, because
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra NaraIn Singh and ors. Vs. Gopi Sundari Dasya
Kolkata
May-08-1913
Land Acquisition
25Ind.Cas.366
land revenue and in connection with that separate account, the Collector proceeded under Section 44 of the Bengal Cess Act ( IX of 1880) to apportion half the cesses to the plaintiffs' share and half the cesses to … is or is not correct, the burden is on him to prove that it is correct, because under Section 95 the general rule is that the return filed by him is only admissible in evidence against and is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohamed Wasil Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Aug-24-1908
Criminal
4Ind.Cas.578
Road-cess return which he submitted to the Collector under Section 14 of the Road Cess and Public Works Cess Act (IX, B.C. of 1880).2. Nobody appears to oppose this rule and after reading the explanation which has been … in the return was to support a civil suit. The Magistrate has, however, failed to realise that under Section 95 of the Act such a return is admissible in evidence against the person making it, but is not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »