Advanced Search Results
Srimantes Lal Maity and ors. Vs. Sibu Raul and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-20-1916
Civil
37Ind.Cas.755
on which he has done so is that be considers that by reason of Section 20 of the Cess Act, IX(B. C.) of 1880, the Court is precluded from giving the plaintiff a larger amount than the amount
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJatindra Kumar Banerjee and ors. Vs. Ajit Kumar Banerjee and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-11-1948
PropertyTenancy
Bengal Cess Act, 1880 - Section 20
AIR1952Cal250
a disability of the plaintiffs to recover the rents, created, according to him, by Section 20 of the Cess Act, contended that assuming that the plaintiffs were the landlords of the lands in suit still they were debarred
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJogeshwar Singh and ors. Vs. Ramoo Singh
Kolkata
Apr-17-1913
Land Acquisition
43Ind.Cas.497
in my opinion the appeal must be dismissed with costs.Newbould, J.5. I. Agree Bengal Cess Act (IX of 1880), Section 20 - Tenant's land entered in Road Cess Return as zerait--suit for rent, whether barred. -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sheikh Samdani and anr. Vs. Kamalakant Jha and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-03-1912
Land Acquisition
15Ind.Cas.424
of guardianship whether valid--One member of age--Whether certificate of guardianship of minor members, valid--Bengal Cess Act (IX of 1880), Section 20, Schedule A, Part I--Tenant's name not entered in Part I or II--Whether rent suit maintainable. -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujraj Sahai Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council and anr.
Kolkata
Aug-02-1889
Civil
(1890)ILR17Cal414
of the numerous demands to which the provision applies, to which are added, by Section 98 of the Cess Act (Bengal Act IX of 1880), demands coming due under that Act], 'the Collector of the district may make … defective to such a degree, that either the certificate should be cancelled and the sale set aside under Section 20, or the sale be set aside because not made under the Act at all.7. The Act (Section 7)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.C. Paul Agricultural Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal ...
Kolkata
Sep-29-1983
ConstitutionCivil
1984(3)ECC200
all immovable properties on which road and public works cess are assessed according to the provisions of the Cess Act, 1880, shall be liable to pay rural employment cess. After Section 4(1) was amended by Section 7 of the … law did not invade entry No. 52, List 1 of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. 20. The West Bengal Rural Employment and Production Act, 1976, does not impose restriction on freedom of trade, commerce
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirish Chandra Singha and anr. Vs. Mohammad Rausan Mian and ors.
Kolkata
May-08-1930
Tenancy
AIR1933Cal66
by the plaintiffs some years previously and that as a consequence no suit would lie under Section 20, Cess Act (Bengal 9 of 1880).2. The plaintiffs filed a cross-objection as to jotes ka and uma which was dismissed,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDattatraya Vasudev Khatkul Vs. Parashram Anant Moghe
Mumbai
Jun-28-1943
Tenancy
AIR1944Bom218; (1944)46BOMLR363
khata No. 84 should be fixed at survey assessment and local fund cess only. Defendant No. 2 as the managing khot having given his consent … Nos. 1 and 2. The other parties shall bear their own costs. Khoti Settlement Act (Bom. I of 1880), Section 17, 18, 20-Occupancy tenant-Payment of rent-Entry in botkhat-Subsequent amendment of entry only with consent of managing khot-Entry ultra … Lokur, J.1. This appeal involves a question of considerable importance under the Khoti Settlement Act, 1880.2. The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff and defendants Nos. 2 to 17 are co-sharers in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrasanno Kumar Bhattacharjee and anr. Vs. Krishna Singha Sarma and ors ...
Kolkata
Jun-20-1919
Civil
AIR1919Cal233,53Ind.Cas.202
road cess return as an admission only. It is more than an admission under Section 20 of the Cess Act, IX of 1880. There is a statutory bar to the plaintiffs recovering rent at a higher rate than
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTaser Mondal Vs. Prokash Chandra Mukherjee and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-09-1928
Property
AIR1929Cal31
the rate mentioned in the Road Cess Return which the plaintiff had filed under the provisions of the Cess Act 9 of 1880. The trial Court decreed the suit at the annual jama, of Rs. 21 only together … that it had undergone any alteration. He has observed further that the prohibition contained in Clause (b) of Section 20, Cess Act, does not apply, because it is difficult to say that the paddy rent of 14 aris
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »