Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cess act 1880 section 165 · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.012 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 10 1890

Saraswati Dasi Vs. Monindra Nath Mookerji

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-10-1890

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1891)ILR18Cal125

sale of a taluk of hers, which was sold on the 29th November 1886 for arrears of road cess, amounting to Rs. 2-14, and which taluk was purchased by the defendant. She alleges that she received no … She alleges that she received no notice of the filing of the certificate under the Public Demands Recovery Act in the office of the Collector, as required by Section 10, Bengal Act VII of 1880; that the … sale, and has awarded her mesne profits, less a sum of Rs. 165-2, proved to have been paid by the defendant as cesses during the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1901

Dilwar Ali and anr. Vs. Ram Taruck Hazra

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-05-1901

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1902)ILR29Cal94

their co-sharers as debtors, and stating, that a certain sum of money was duo from' them as road cess on account of wehal No. 1381 which was erroneously named as mouza Kothalgachi; that the sale proclamation which … assess the hearing fee in this Court at Rs. 850. Public Demands Recovery Act {Bengal Act VII of 1880) Section 19 - Suit to set aside a sale in execution of a certificate--Bengal Act I of 1895, Sections … Bagh Kalapahar, which was worth Rs. 25,000, was sold only for Rs. 165 and that the sale was fraudulently brought about by defendants 3 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1953

The Province of Bombay Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-1953

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 14, Rule 1(2) - Order 21, Rule 2; Bombay Land Revenue Code - Sections 45, 128, 131, 216 and 217; Bombay Land Revenue Rules - Rules 13, 14 and 53; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 50; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Limitation Act, 1877; Limitation Act, 1871 - Schedule - Article 131; Bhagdari Act; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Khoti Settlement Act, 1880 - Sections 9; Local Government Act, 1919 - Sections 33 and 153(3); Land Tax Assessment Act, 1910 - Sections 38(7); Chota Nagpur Encumbered Estates Act, 1876 - Sections 2, 3(4) and 12A; Bombay Tenancy Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 13; Estates Land Act - Sections 3(4); Poor Relief

Reported in : AIR1954Bom1; (1953)55BOMLR670; ILR1953Bom1081

of rent for four years--1327 to 1330 B.S. --at Rs. 16 per year together with R-s. 2 for cess and interest on arrears of rent at 75 per cent, under a kabuliyat, in all amounting to Rs. … of redemption to the mortgagees on 9-10-1882; but the sale was void as contravening Section 9, Khoti Settlement Act, 1880, as it then stood. The mortgagees remained in possession of the lands till 1915, when the mortgagors recovered … the legal quality of the fact. They observed in that case (p. 165):'......In the opinion of their Lordships it issettled, first, that the admission of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 09 1955

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Director of Rationing and Distribution

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-09-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 386 and 386(1); ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 3(32); ;Constitution of India - Article 300; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 - Section 8; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1955Cal282,1955CriLJ792

1923, exempts ships belonging to the Government or His Majesty, except where specially provided. Under Section 8, Bengal Cess Act, Act 9/1880 the Government was not liable to the cesses without the consent of the Governor General in … unwise.Here the Privy Council refers to the case of --'Gorton Local Board v. Prison Commissioners', (1904) 2 KB 165 (E). In dealing with the contention of the respondent that whenever a statute is enacted for the public

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial