Advanced Search Results

imrit Chamar Vs. Sridhar Panday and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 13Ind.Cas.120

been argued that the Road Cess Return is not admissible in evidence under Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act, 1880. That section, however, has no application to the circumstances of the present case. The maker of the document … the principle explained by this Court on the case of Abdulla v. Kunja Behari Lal 12 Ind. Cas. 149 : 14 C.L.J. 467. In fact, the case before us is stronger than the case then before the

Chalho Singh and ors. Vs. Jharo Singh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 18Ind.Cas.61

the decision of the Judicial Committee is an authority for the proposition that Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act, 1880, is not exhaustive and that a road-cess return may be admissible in evidence as against persons other than … Dassi 11 0. 588 and In re Whiteley and Roberts' Arbitration (1891) 1 Ch. 558; 60 L.J. Ch. 149. In the case first mention ed, reliance was placed by Sir Richard Garth, C.J., upon a passage from

The Secretary of State for India in Council by the Collector of Ganjam ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1916Mad186; 30Ind.Cas.609

The result is that the appeal succeeds and the plaintiffs' suit is dismissed with costs througout. Madras Irrigation Cess Act (VII of 1805), Section 1 - Madras Land Encroachment Act (III of 1905)--Inam village--Irrigation from Government source--Hirer flowing … expressed opinions and pious expectations of bodies so diverse as the Select Committee and the Famine Commission of 1880. The general argument in Court and in the learned Judge's judgment, so far as it is distinguishable from … India 2 Ind. Cas. 325 : 32 M.K 141 : 5 M.L.T. 149 : 19 M.L.J. 131 recognised the paramount right of Government without reference

United Arab Republic and anr. Vs. Mirza Ali Akbar Kashani

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 84, 86 and 87 - Order 7, Rule 11; ;Government Trading Taxation Act, 1926 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1962Cal387

in the case of Mighell v. Sultan of Johore. (1894) 1 Q.B. 149. At page 159 Lord Esher ruled that the question of submission to … of the appellants in making the application was to have the plaint rejected as disclosing no cause of action. The question therefore is whether the ap-pellants can be said to have submitted to the jurisdiction of this … Government of India. Similarly it is admitted that no consent has been obtained from the Central Government under Section 86 Civil Procedure Code to sue the Ruler of the first defendant who according to the definition in

Ram Das Rae and ors. Vs. Brindaban Ram

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1931All113; 129Ind.Cas.719

possessed by us, together with high and low lands, water and forest produce, fruit and timber trees, artizan's cess, fish, groves, ponds, said items and all the appurtenances, to Khushi Ram, Bhagirathi Ram, brother and heir of … been satisfied out of the usufruct. This was suit No. 12S of 1880. The Court held that the transaction amounted to a mortgage, but it … Bal Kishan Das v. Legge [1900] 22 All. 149, Legge purported to sell his estate to his … decree. The suit was directed against 29 defendants of whom defendants 1 to 6 were the persons in actual possession of the property in controversy.4. The lower appellate Court disagreed with the trial Court and held that … by the Privy Council in the leading case, the T. P. Act, Section 58, defines a mortgage by conditional sale stating the already existing law