Advanced Search Results
Raja Ganga NaraIn Singh and Vs. Shashi Bhusan Rai and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-16-1914
Commercial
28Ind.Cas.811
in rent-free brahmottar with its recognition by Mr. Rowlitt (Exibits 5 and 12) the admission in the road cess return of 1872 (Exhibit 19) that Gobindpore was brahmottar even though it was made by a manager oh … of waste lands which, if the law contained in Act IX of 1880 B.C., had been complied with, would have been an indication that no … by sinking a pit. In the following March the principal defendants opposed their doing so, and proceedings under Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, were instituted, which led to the defendants being declared to be in possession. Hence this … led to the defendants being declared to be in possession. Hence this action.2. The defendants generally deny the plaintiff's title, and set up one of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindrajit Pratap Sahi Vs. Amar Singh
Mumbai
May-15-1923
Property
(1923)25BOMLR1259
only one village or to the three villages together.8. This is an action in ejectment; in the proceedings under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure … compromise. This document is marked Exhibit 20, and bears date May 30, 1880. By the terms of this agreement Raja Krishna Pratap Sahai undertook to … one village or to the three villages together.8. This is an action in ejectment; in the proceedings under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 1912 the defendant was found to be in possession of the villages … it is given to you in writing that you should pay and deliver Rs. 1507 mal (rent) with cesses in cash and 30 Maunds of Arwa rice the rent of the said Mouza due from you commencing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunshi Kali Sankar Sahai and ors. Vs. Maharajah Pratap Udai Nath Sahi ...
Kolkata
Jul-24-1911
Land Acquisition
15Ind.Cas.691
had never ceased and the ladies had never asserted any adverse rights and had paid in the road cess and filed road-cess returns which was the only act of tenancy they had to perform.3. He also found … the High Court in their judgment in R. A. No. 6 of 1880, dated the 24th November 1381, which will be found on page 15 … Nos. 4, 5, 7 and 8 who were made parties more than three years after the order under Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, passed on the 10th February 1902. The Subordinate Judge held that the estate of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
A. Rajagopala Aiyar and ors. Vs. S. Ramachandra Aiyar
Chennai
Feb-04-1942
Property
AIR1942Mad628; (1942)2MLJ406
the view was taken that a provision in a mortgage deed requiring the mortgagor to pay 'rent, royalty, cesses, taxes, rates, assessments and impositions which now are or hereafter may be payable in respect of the said … respondent could not be regarded as a surety within the meaning of Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, but that his case fell within the third category of the cases referred to in the judgment of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Eastern Mortgage and Agency Co., Ltd. and ors. Vs. Moulvi Mohammad ...
Kolkata
Mar-23-1925
Education
90Ind.Cas.851
the fraudulent misrepresentation consisting of a representation that 'the properties were free of encumbrances, and that rents and cess due to superior landlords for the properties sold up to the date of the deed of sale were … (1910) 1 Ch. 297 : 79 L.J. Ch. 439 : 102 L.T. 145 and In re Martin, Ex parte Dixon (1912) 106 L.T. 381.] In … the mind that he may be entitled to recover under the provisions of Section 69 of the Contract Act.4. The plaint, however, does not proceed upon such simple lines. The main plank is that there was fraudulent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRambishen Dutt Vs. Haripada Mukerjee and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-26-1919
Property
51Ind.Cas.389
the plaintiffs themselves have mentioned the Jote in their road-cess returns filed subsequent to the mortgages, (iii) in 1880, when a share of the, Mehal was let out in Ijara, the farmer showed the Jote as in … Mumtaz Ali khan 5 C. 198 P.C. 5 C.L.R. 213 6 I.A. 145 ; 4 Sar. P.C.J. 17 : 3 Suth P. C.J. 637 ; … November 1901 and the Patni interest on the 3rd July 1911. The land in suit is in the actual occupation of the Domes (the second and third defendants) who hold as sub tenants on payment of paddy … of merger is erroneous in law.2. The Subordinate Judge his relied on Section 111, Clause (d), of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 22
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›