Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cess act 1880 section 132 · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.012 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 1968

State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Maharaja Pratap Singh Bahadur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-11-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3A, 4, 23(1), 24A(1); Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 2A, 4 and 24A

Reported in : AIR1969SC164; 1968(16)BLJR973; [1968]3SCR734

the writ application shows that cess was deducted from the malikana. Under secs. 5 and 421 of the Cess Act., 1880 cess is charged on immovable property and is payable by the holder of an estate or tenure or … malikana is not a charge on immovable property the explanation to art. 132 of that Act declared that for the purposes of that article, it … 1958. The State of Bihar has filed this appeal on a certificate granted by the High Court. 3. Section 2 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act is the definition section. Section 2(i) defines an estate to mean

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1935

Secy. of State Vs. Jitendra Nath Roy

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-22-1935

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1936Cal70

a declaration that certain re-valuation proceedings in connexion with assessment of cess under the provisions contained in the Cess Act (Bengal Act 9 of 1880) were illegal, ultra vires and not binding on the plaintiff. The question relevant … imposition of cess made in respect of Jessore portion of Touzi No. 132 of the Jessore Collectorate, under Section 21, Cess Act, was ultra vires, illegal and not binding against the plaintiff, for non-service of notice under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 1918

Manmatha Nath Mitter and ors. Vs. Anath Bandhu Pal Self and as Executo ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-07-1918

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 50Ind.Cas.222

be levied upon such value. But having regard to the fact that under Section 20 of the Road Cess Act the landlord is precluded from suing for or recovering any rent not included in there turn no importance … of tenancy--Transfer-ability--Burden of proof--Bengal Tenancy Act (VIII B.C. of 1885), Sections 1(5), 50--Bengal Drainage Act (VI B.C. of 1880), Section 42(a)--Rent, whether includes drainage charges--Decree for rent including drainage charges, whether rent decree--Presumption under Section 50, Bengal Tenancy … rant were stated as follows: B. C. Ch. Rs. as. Gs. Ks. 132 8 12 Rent ... 179 4 17 1 Company's Batta ... 11

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 28 1987

Sagar Art Service, New Delhi Vs. Municipal Corporation, Gwalior and an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-28-1987

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 5(56A), 8, 80(5), 82, 132(2)(1); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2 and 3; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 91; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 6, 10, 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1988MP46; 1988MPLJ392

which counsel has relied. Section 5(56-A) of the 1956 Act defines the term 'tax' -- 'includes any toll, cess, fee or other impost levied or leviable under this Act'. Power of municipal corporation to acquire and bold … in Budhan Singh's case (1969) 2 SCC 481 : (AIR 1970 SC 1880) in the context of the provisions of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and … public lands, lamp-posts and apparatus connected therewith or appertaining thereto;' 10. Reliance is placed by learned counsel on Section 132(2)(1) to stress existence in Corporation of the power to levy 'a tax on advertisements other than advertisements published

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1942

A. Rajagopala Aiyar and ors. Vs. S. Ramachandra Aiyar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-04-1942

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1942Mad628; (1942)2MLJ406

is in. the English form the suit will be governed by article 132 of the Limitation Act and therefore will be out of time. The … the view was taken that a provision in a mortgage deed requiring the mortgagor to pay 'rent, royalty, cesses, taxes, rates, assessments and impositions which now are or hereafter may be payable in respect of the said … respondent could not be regarded as a surety within the meaning of Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, but that his case fell within the third category of the cases referred to in the judgment of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial