Advanced Search Results
The Secretary of State for India in Council by the Collector of Ganjam ...
Chennai
Aug-06-1915
Civil
AIR1916Mad186; 30Ind.Cas.609
The result is that the appeal succeeds and the plaintiffs' suit is dismissed with costs througout. Madras Irrigation Cess Act (VII of 1805), Section 1 - Madras Land Encroachment Act (III of 1905)--Inam village--Irrigation from Government source--Hirer flowing … expressed opinions and pious expectations of bodies so diverse as the Select Committee and the Famine Commission of 1880. The general argument in Court and in the learned Judge's judgment, so far as it is distinguishable from … 325 : 32 M.K 141 : 5 M.L.T. 149 : 19 M.L.J. 131 recognised the paramount right of Government without reference to Act III of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilwar Ali and anr. Vs. Ram Taruck Hazra
Kolkata
Jul-05-1901
Property
(1902)ILR29Cal94
their co-sharers as debtors, and stating, that a certain sum of money was duo from' them as road cess on account of wehal No. 1381 which was erroneously named as mouza Kothalgachi; that the sale proclamation which … assess the hearing fee in this Court at Rs. 850. Public Demands Recovery Act {Bengal Act VII of 1880) Section 19 - Suit to set aside a sale in execution of a certificate--Bengal Act I of 1895, Sections … Before concluding, we would observe that for a small arrear of Rs. 131-5 annas stated in the certificate (Ex. 14), as due on account of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited Arab Republic and anr. Vs. Mirza Ali Akbar Kashani
Kolkata
Apr-17-1961
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 84, 86 and 87 - Order 7, Rule 11; ;Government Trading Taxation Act, 1926 - Section 2
AIR1962Cal387
seeks to recover from it the amount of freight overpaid, see (1924) 131 LT 388, or moneys payable under a contract for purchase of goods, … of the appellants in making the application was to have the plaint rejected as disclosing no cause of action. The question therefore is whether the ap-pellants can be said to have submitted to the jurisdiction of this … Government of India. Similarly it is admitted that no consent has been obtained from the Central Government under Section 86 Civil Procedure Code to sue the Ruler of the first defendant who according to the definition in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raja Kritanand Singh Bahadur and ors. Vs. Secretary of State and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-06-1940
Property
AIR1940Cal506
an in. dependent estate, No. 557 of the Maldah Collectorate with an annual revenue of Rs. 1700 and cess Rs. 17. It was advertised for sale in the Calcutta Gazette of 28th September 1870, (Exs. I and … in sheets Nos. 6 and 7 of the revenue survey map of 1880 (Ex. 6 (a) and Ex. 6 (b); Maps 6 and 7) the … effect from 1st April 1871, (Ex. E, B 131). They continued as proprietors till about 1888 (there … in paying revenue in 1892, with the result that the mahal was again put up to sale under Act 11 of 1859 and was purchased by the Government on 4th November 1892 (Ex. 2, B. 157). In … of 1793; and that it can only be admitted in evidence under Section 13, Evidence Act, if it can be proved that the rights of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunjabai Bhilasa Vs. Bhagvandas Kisandas
Mumbai
Sep-14-1928
Contract
(1929)31BOMLR88; 117Ind.Cas.518
held that the Chief had such an interest in the village as would entitle him to pay the cess to Government if there was any danger of forfeiture in consequence of non-payment by the holdera of the … 70. In Ram Tuhul Singh v. Biseswar Loll Sahoo I.L.R (1875) IndAp 131. their Lordships of the Privy Council remark (p. 143) :-.it is not … facts found the appellant can maintain her claim under the provisions of Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act. The Court of first instance found in favour of that plea and decreed the claim. The appellate Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›