Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cess act 1880 section 130 · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 29 1911

imrit Chamar Vs. Sridhar Panday and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-29-1911

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 13Ind.Cas.120

been argued that the Road Cess Return is not admissible in evidence under Section 95 of the Bengal Cess Act, 1880. That section, however, has no application to the circumstances of the present case. The maker of the document … the case of Bhagabat Prasad Singh v. King Emperor 14 C.L.J. 120 : 11 Ind. Cas. 794 under Section 130 of the Indian Evidence Act, no witness who is not a party to a suit can be compelled

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1924

Probhat Chandra Barua Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-08-1924

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : AIR1924Cal668

State (1907) 34 Cal. 251, royalties from a coal mine were held liable both to cess under the Cess Act, 1880, and to income-tax under the Act of 1886, but it was said that,it may be conceded that Courts … actual cultivator of lands was limited to those whose land was worth less than Rs. 600 per annum (Section 130). This Act was for five years only, and may be regarded as an emergency measure. There is no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1924

Emperor Vs. Probhat Chandra Barua

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-08-1924

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1924)ILR51Cal504

I.L.R. 34 Calc. 257, 287, royalties from a coal mine were held liable both to cess under the Cess Act, 1880, and to income-tax under the Act of 1886, but it was said that 'it may be conceded that … actual cultivator of lands was limited to those whose land was worth less than Rs. 600 per annum (Section 130). This Act was for five years only, and may be regarded as an emergency measure. There is no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 1918

Kherode Behari Gossami Vs. Raja Narendra Lal Khan

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-15-1918

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 55Ind.Cas.310

to repay it, even if any such representation was in fact made.10. The suit is not brought under Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, but the cause of action is based upon the ground that … included the Rs. 5,000 paid to the plaintiff in March 1911 and Rs. 20,034 10 in respect of cesses, taxes and Government revenue. As regards arrears the only evidence is that the Rs. 28,243 'was realised as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1910

Vidyapurna Thirthaswami Vs. Uggannu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-05-1910

Subject : TenancyProperty

Reported in : (1911)ILR34Mad231

current coin from 1292 (fasli) together with abwab, such as, selami for Dasserah and Holi, Purkha, Sair, Road cess, Public works cess, etc., all of which are included in that very sum of Rs. 1,585.' The High … and mulgenidars are well described in Sturrock's Manual of the District, page 130, volume I, in these terms: The mulgeni or permanent lease is of … who is the pattadar in exhibit B and therefore the 'landholder' under Section 1 of the Revenue Recovery Act II of 1864, and bound to pay the revenue to Government under Section 3 of the Act, as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1920

Sakaram Gopal Page Vs. Trimbakrao Ramchandra Mantri

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-28-1920

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : (1921)23BOMLR314; 61Ind.Cas.40

assessment of those lands in that document was set out as being Rs. 66; whereas the local fund cess levied in 1871 shows that the lands in the possession of the plaintiff's ancestor would have been assessed … Article of the Indian Limitation Act held to be applicable was Article 130. That appears from a consideration of the Report as a whole, but … than Government such as we find in Section 56 of the Land Revenue Code as amended by Bombay Act VI of 1901. Subject to its being free from debts and charges, the new holder takes the estate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2009

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-05-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 64, 64(4), 68 and 69; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(1), 9, 9(1), 10, 10 (1), 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 11(2); Land Acquisition Act; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(1), 7(2), 13 and 18; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 12 (1), 12(3), 21 to 24 , 31, 33 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 123, 124 and 127A(2); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. 1956 - Sections 136; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

legislature.(C) In State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. (supra) facts show that the constitutionality of the Cess Act, 1880, West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973, West Bengal Rural Development and Production Act, 1976 as amended by the … and it is Central Government Undertaking in public sector as also the Government Company within the meaning of Section 617 of Companies Act. It is having coal mines in western part of the nation including State of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1920

Sakharam Govind Page Vs. Trimbakrao Ramchandrarao Mantri

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-28-1920

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : AIR1921Bom303; (1921)ILR45Bom694

assessment of those lands in that document was set out as being Rs. 66; whereas the Local Fund cess levied in 1871 shows that the lands in the possession of the plaintiff's ancestor would have been assessed … the Article of the Limitation Act held to be applicable was Article 130. That appears from a consideration of the Report as a whole, but … also apparently considered that a grant such as is here alleged could not be established without the prod action of some document. I do not understand the exact reason for this view and it is clearly unsustainable … favour of any person other than Government such as we find in Section 56 of the Land Revenue Code as amended by Bombay Act VI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial