Advanced Search Results
Prof.(Dr.) G. Venkatesh Kumar, vs Union of India,
Kerala
Apr-11-2023
that the appointment of 3rd respondent is illegal since the same is made in violation of UGC Regulations, Central Universities Act, 2009, and its Statutes and marred by procedural defects. The relief as regards the issuance of the writ of … filed on behalf of the Union of India, Ministry of Education it is stated that, in terms of Section 11(1) of the Central Universities Act, 2009 and Statute 2 of the Statutes, if the Visitor does not … OF EXHIBIT P27 EXHIBIT P28 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.04.2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MINISTRY OF
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Naveen Prakash Nautiyal vs Union of India
Kerala
Apr-11-2023
that the appointment of 3rd respondent is illegal since the same is made in violation of UGC Regulations, Central Universities Act, 2009, and its Statutes and marred by procedural defects. The relief as regards the issuance of the writ of … filed on behalf of the Union of India, Ministry of Education it is stated that, in terms of Section 11(1) of the Central Universities Act, 2009 and Statute 2 of the Statutes, if the Visitor does not … OF EXHIBIT P27 EXHIBIT P28 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.04.2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MINISTRY OF
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskProf.(Dr).T.S. Girishkumar vs Union of India
Kerala
Apr-11-2023
that the appointment of 3rd respondent is illegal since the same is made in violation of UGC Regulations, Central Universities Act, 2009, and its Statutes and marred by procedural defects. The relief as regards the issuance of the writ of … filed on behalf of the Union of India, Ministry of Education it is stated that, in terms of Section 11(1) of the Central Universities Act, 2009 and Statute 2 of the Statutes, if the Visitor does not … OF EXHIBIT P27 EXHIBIT P28 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.04.2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MINISTRY OF
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr.Laila T.Abraham, vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-19-2022
OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY. Exhibit P20 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PART OF THE CENTRAL UNIVERSITY ACT, 2009 (SECTION 9) Exhibit P21 TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS NO.GA/J3/16137/2016 DATED 02/08/2021 OF THE KERALA ARGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY. Exhibit P22 TRUE … the appendix to the “UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in WP(C) NO. 9104 OF 2019 3 Higher Education, … BY THE UGC. EXHIBIT P4(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.9.2010 ISSUED BY THE UGC. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE GO
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSomesh Thapliyal Vs. Vice Chancellor H.n.b. Garhwal University
Supreme Court of India
Sep-03-2021
Education
the Act. On 15th January, 2009, the University was converted into a Central University and is governed by Central Universities Act, 2009(hereinafter being referred to as the “Act 2009”).4. B. Pharma course which was offered by the Department of … time of appointment of the appellants, University was a State University governed by the Act 1973 established under Section 4(1) of the Act. On 15th January, 2009, the University was converted into a Central University and is … 1973, postulates of making regular selections on the recommendations made by the 18 selection committee constituted in terms of Sec. 31(1) read with Sec. 31(4)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarish Mohan Vs. Central University of Jharkhand Through Its Registrar ...
Jharkhand
Feb-19-2016
Education
to declare that so called notification dated 05.08.2013 issued in purported compliance of amended Statute 11 of the Central Universities Act, 2009 having no legal enforceability because of non publication of the Official Gazette as required under Section 43 of … being selected received offer of appointment to the respective posts in Central University of Jharkhand vide letter dated 18.11.2011. In pursuance to the appointment order, the petitioners submitted their joining reports and all the appointments were made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumar Pankaj Anand Vs. Central University of Jharkhand Through Its Reg ...
Jharkhand
Feb-19-2016
Education
to declare that so called notification dated 05.08.2013 issued in purported compliance of amended Statute 11 of the Central Universities Act, 2009 having no legal enforceability because of non publication of the Official Gazette as required under Section 43 of … being selected received offer of appointment to the respective posts in Central University of Jharkhand vide letter dated 18.11.2011. In pursuance to the appointment order, the petitioners submitted their joining reports and all the appointments were made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr Iswar Chand Bidyasagar Vs. Central University of Jharkhand Through ...
Jharkhand
Feb-19-2016
Education
to declare that so called notification dated 05.08.2013 issued in purported compliance of amended Statute 11 of the Central Universities Act, 2009 having no legal enforceability because of non publication of the Official Gazette as required under Section 43 of … being selected received offer of appointment to the respective posts in Central University of Jharkhand vide letter dated 18.11.2011. In pursuance to the appointment order, the petitioners submitted their joining reports and all the appointments were made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSandeep Kumar Vs. Central University of Jharkhand Through Its Registra ...
Jharkhand
Feb-19-2016
Education
to declare that so called notification dated 05.08.2013 issued in purported compliance of amended Statute 11 of the Central Universities Act, 2009 having no legal enforceability because of non publication of the Official Gazette as required under Section 43 of … being selected received offer of appointment to the respective posts in Central University of Jharkhand vide letter dated 18.11.2011. In pursuance to the appointment order, the petitioners submitted their joining reports and all the appointments were made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunwar Arjun Singh Mahavidyalaya, Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judg ...
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-21-2014
Education
an order passed on an appeal filed by the institute before the Appellate Board under the provisions of Section 18 of the National Council for Teachers Education Act. It is not an order refusing recognition. It is said … by the University or other Government Institute. Even this admission has to be done on the basis of centralized councilling done for B.Ed examination by the University and not by College level councilling by the Principal. He … State Government. Shri Vibhudendra Mishra, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 University. Shri K. K. Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.4 National Council for … in the examination for the B.Ed Degree Course pertaining to academic Session 2009-2010. 2 2. It is the case of the petitioner's institute that they
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »