Advanced Search Results

Anil Dikshit Vs. State of Jharkhand Through the Central Bureau of Inve ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

design which involved crores of rupees. It has submitted that the Central University of Jharkhand was established through Central Universities Act, 2009 the entire universities is governed under the norms of this Act, a copy of the same has been … these cases arising out of same case being R.C.No.12(A)/2014-R, registered under Section 120B, 420, 468, 471 read with Section 13(2) R/w 13 (1) (d) of the P.C. Act. The brief facts of the case is that one S.K.Khare,

Narendra Pal Garg Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

design which involved crores of rupees. It has submitted that the Central University of Jharkhand was established through Central Universities Act, 2009 the entire universities is governed under the norms of this Act, a copy of the same has been … these cases arising out of same case being R.C.No.12(A)/2014-R, registered under Section 120B, 420, 468, 471 read with Section 13(2) R/w 13 (1) (d) of the P.C. Act. The brief facts of the case is that one S.K.Khare,

Samir Rastogi Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through C B I

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

design which involved crores of rupees. It has submitted that the Central University of Jharkhand was established through Central Universities Act, 2009 the entire universities is governed under the norms of this Act, a copy of the same has been … these cases arising out of same case being R.C.No.12(A)/2014-R, registered under Section 120B, 420, 468, 471 read with Section 13(2) R/w 13 (1) (d) of the P.C. Act. The brief facts of the case is that one S.K.Khare,

Swami Rama Institution of Education Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Constitution

a central university w.e.f. 15.1.2009, vide ordinance dated 15.1.2009, which has since become an Act known as the Central Universities Act, 2009 and, therefore, the Registrar of the university has rightly rejected the request of the petitioner for granting affiliation … is a mere formality.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Ravi Babulkar is relying upon Clause (6) of Section 14 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 which says that since the petitioner has already

Dr.Laila T.Abraham, vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY. Exhibit P20 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PART OF THE CENTRAL UNIVERSITY ACT, 2009 (SECTION 9) Exhibit P21 TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS NO.GA/J3/16137/2016 DATED 02/08/2021 OF THE KERALA ARGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY. Exhibit P22 TRUE … the appendix to the “UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in WP(C) NO. 9104 OF 2019 3 Higher Education, … OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT. Exhibit P24 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 13/06/2019 IN WP(C) NO. 9104 OF 2019 10 CONTEMPT CASE CIVIL NO.1951 OF

Chandra Prakash Singh vs.central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

........ Petitioner (iii) + CRL.REV.P. 250/2018, CRL.M.A. 5283/2018 DEEPA SINHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Urfee Haider, Advocate Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Special Prosecutor with Mr. Public Philoman Kani, Advocate … of the Crl.M.C. 1339/2018 Crl.M.C.1490/2018 Crl.Rev.P.250/2018 Page 2 of 6 Delhi Technology University Act, 2009 (henceforth referred to as the „DTU Act‟) to observe that … has referred to Section 13(4) of the Crl.M.C. 1339/2018 Crl.M.C.1490/2018 Crl.Rev.P.250/2018 Page 2 of 6 Delhi Technology University Act, 2009 (henceforth referred to as the „DTU Act‟) to observe that this provision does not give unbridled powers to

Deepa Sinha vs.central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

........ Petitioner (iii) + CRL.REV.P. 250/2018, CRL.M.A. 5283/2018 DEEPA SINHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Urfee Haider, Advocate Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Special Prosecutor with Mr. Public Philoman Kani, Advocate … of the Crl.M.C. 1339/2018 Crl.M.C.1490/2018 Crl.Rev.P.250/2018 Page 2 of 6 Delhi Technology University Act, 2009 (henceforth referred to as the „DTU Act‟) to observe that … has referred to Section 13(4) of the Crl.M.C. 1339/2018 Crl.M.C.1490/2018 Crl.Rev.P.250/2018 Page 2 of 6 Delhi Technology University Act, 2009 (henceforth referred to as the „DTU Act‟) to observe that this provision does not give unbridled powers to

Prf. p.b. Sharma vs.central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

........ Petitioner (iii) + CRL.REV.P. 250/2018, CRL.M.A. 5283/2018 DEEPA SINHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Urfee Haider, Advocate Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Special Prosecutor with Mr. Public Philoman Kani, Advocate … of the Crl.M.C. 1339/2018 Crl.M.C.1490/2018 Crl.Rev.P.250/2018 Page 2 of 6 Delhi Technology University Act, 2009 (henceforth referred to as the „DTU Act‟) to observe that … has referred to Section 13(4) of the Crl.M.C. 1339/2018 Crl.M.C.1490/2018 Crl.Rev.P.250/2018 Page 2 of 6 Delhi Technology University Act, 2009 (henceforth referred to as the „DTU Act‟) to observe that this provision does not give unbridled powers to

Somesh Thapliyal Vs. Vice Chancellor H.n.b. Garhwal University

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

the Act. On 15th January, 2009, the University was converted into a Central University and is governed by Central Universities Act, 2009(hereinafter being referred to as the “Act 2009”).4. B. Pharma course which was offered by the Department of … time of appointment of the appellants, University was a State University governed by the Act 1973 established under Section 4(1) of the Act. On 15th January, 2009, the University was converted into a Central University and is … to note that out of 58 teaching posts, 22 teaching posts(Assistant Professor 13, Associate Professor 06, Professor 03) belongs to the pharmacy department. The nomenclature

Dr. Naveen Prakash Nautiyal vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

that the appointment of 3rd respondent is illegal since the same is made in violation of UGC Regulations, Central Universities Act, 2009, and its Statutes and marred by procedural defects. The relief as regards the issuance of the writ of … filed on behalf of the Union of India, Ministry of Education it is stated that, in terms of Section 11(1) of the Central Universities Act, 2009 and Statute 2 of the Statutes, if the Visitor does not … Chancellor. From among the 5 candidates, the Visitor, by Ext.P12 order dated 13.08.2020, appointed the 3 rd respondent as the Vice-Chancellor of the University.6. The