Advanced Search Results

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

have been allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight digit

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … also be noticed at this stage that the packing sizes conform to the requirement of Clause 5 of Schedule I of the Edible Oil packaging (Regulation) Order 1998 read with serial No.10 Schedule III of the Standards of

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … also be noticed at this stage that the packing sizes conform to the requirement of Clause 5 of Schedule I of the Edible Oil packaging (Regulation) Order 1998 read with serial No.10 Schedule III of the Standards of

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ltu, Delhi vs.nangalama ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

of the following Additional Note to the General Rule of Interpretation of the Schedule, in respect of the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004, whereby “electrical energy” was introduced in Chapter 27 of the Tariff: “(c) “tariff item” means a description of

Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem versus M/S Madhan Agro Industrie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.893

SCR 125 : (2006) 5 SCC 208 - referred to. List of Acts Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004; Central Excise Act, 1944; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Edible Oils Packaging … oil’ under Heading 3305, titled ‘Preparations for use on the hair’, in Section VI-Chapter 33, of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Headnotes† Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - First Schedule, Chapter 15,

Castrol India Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 5A, 5A(4); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8, 8(1), 8(2); Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs and Central Excise Law (Amendment) Act, 1987

Reported in : 2005(99)ECC167; 2005(181)ELT367(SC); JT2005(3)SC13; (2005)3SCC30

(in short the 'Rules') provided for exemption. The Notification No. 120/84-CE was issued on 11.5.1984 when the earlier Excise Tariff was a part of the First Schedule of the Act. The said notification exempted blended and compounded lubricating … Central Excise Rules 1944, and in force immediately before the commencement of the Customs and Central Excise Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 shall be deemed to have been issued or made under the provisions of this Section and shall … the assessee-appellant. The judgment is reported in 2000 (123) ELT 789 Tribunal (Castrol India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta-I).2. The factual position in a nutshell is as follows:The appellant is engaged, inter alia, in the manufacture … - Others.'13. In Collector of Customs, Bangalore v. Maestro Motors Ltd. : 2004(174)ELT289(SC), this Court held as follows:'It is settled law that to avail the

M/S. Federal Mogul Goetze India Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central E ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

under the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), as amended by the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 (5 of 2005), on which appropriate duty of excise is payable. Explanation. - For the purposes of this

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S Federal Mogul Tpr India Lim ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

under the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), as amended by the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 (5 of 2005), on which appropriate duty of excise is payable. Explanation - For the purpose of this

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. A.R.S. Company Ltd. and Azam

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(112)ECC178

that they retain the character of dried fruit or dried nuts.11. With effect from 28.02.05, schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act was restructured while assigning eight digit classification to different commodities covered by the tariff. In the statement … Chapter Subheading 21062 to 0802 9019. They had made the request in the wake of enactment of CETA (Amendment) Act, 2004 on 28.02.05. CSH 21062 hitherto adopted by the appellants reads as betel nut product known as supari, whereas

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … while relying on its decision in the case of M/s Jocil Ltd. & Ors v. The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Visakhapatnam - II.4. The CESTAT, in determining the appeal, took note of the fact that the … the Circular. The goods, which were imported between August 2003 and November 2004, should therefore be classified under the Eight Digit Tariff Schedule.7. On the