Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff amendment act 2004 chapter xv · Page 1 of about 179 results (0.067 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2024

Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem versus M/S Madhan Agro Industrie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.893

SCR 125 : (2006) 5 SCC 208 - referred to. List of Acts Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004; Central Excise Act, 1944; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Edible Oils Packaging … First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Headnotes† Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - First Schedule, Chapter 15, Section III, Heading 1513, titled ‘Coconut (Copra) oil, etc.’; Chapter 33 Section VI Heading 3305, titled ‘Preparations … oil’ under Heading 1513, titled ‘Coconut (Copra) oil, etc.’, in Section III-Chapter 15, or as ‘Hair oil’ under Heading 3305, titled ‘Preparations for use on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 03 2023

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

new tariff entries under Chapters 30 and 33 as under: - “OLD ENTRIES (as per Central Excise Tariff, 2004): Chapter 30:30. 03 Medicaments (including veterinary medicaments). 3003.10 - Patent or proprietary medicaments, other than those medicaments which are … Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required to be classified as ‘cosmetic’ … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … skin, which is against the basic concept of a medicament, which is 15 prescribed or used for a limited period and overdose of a medicament

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2023

Commr.of Cen.exc.ahmedabad Vs. M/s Urmin Products P.ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2023

Subject : Service Tax

ISSUED UNDER CE ACT1 Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff in 2004-05 (6 Digit Code).2. Notification No.13/2002 - CE (NT) dated 01.03.2002 under Section … No.Abbreviation 1. “BIS” Bureau of Indian Standards 2. “CBIC” Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs 3. “CETA” Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 7 4. “CE ACTCentral Excise Act, 1944 5. “CET SH” Central Excise Tariff Sub-Heading 6. … apt and appropriate to extract Section 11A as it stood in 1980, and as it stood after the amendment brought in 2000 and by Act 10 of 2000 (w.e.f. 17.11.1980) and subsequent substitution by Act 8 of … force during the period of the board’s letter dated 23.06.1987, notice dated 15.07.1987, and the notification dated 16.03.1995 and as such they would not come

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2006

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. A.R.S. Company Ltd. and Azam

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jun-30-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(112)ECC178

that they retain the character of dried fruit or dried nuts.11. With effect from 28.02.05, schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act was restructured while assigning eight digit classification to different commodities covered by the tariff. In the statement … Chapter Subheading 21062 to 0802 9019. They had made the request in the wake of enactment of CETA (Amendment) Act, 2004 on 28.02.05. CSH 21062 hitherto adopted by the appellants reads as betel nut product known as supari, whereas

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2010

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

while relying on its decision in the case of M/s Jocil Ltd. & Ors v. The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Visakhapatnam - II.4. The CESTAT, in determining the appeal, took note of the fact that the … First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … the Circular. The goods, which were imported between August 2003 and November 2004, should therefore be classified under the Eight Digit Tariff Schedule.7. On the … Central Revenue Chemical Laboratory (CRCL) opinion which was relied upon by CESTAT, Chapter 15.11 covers palm oil and its fractions - this view is also … Palm Stearin falling under Ch. Sub Heading No. 15 11 90 90 or as "RBD Palm Stearin"

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2005

Commr. of Cus. (Airport) Vs. Skycell Communications Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jan-03-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(181)ELT275Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2012

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-14-2012

Subject : Excise

have been allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight digit … the period from 1st June 1998 to 30th November 1999 on the ground that fresh mushrooms classifiable under Chapter 7 heading No.0701.00 were liable to pay Nil rate of duty under the Central Excise Tariff but as … has filed the present appeal under Section 35G of the 1944 Act. 15. Mr.Sridharan, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

for the said period it was found that the appellant had failed to give any ‘chapter heading under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of said goods in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and … fact is further clarified by the Central Government in Notification No.221/96, as amended by Notification No.89/89. Item 6 thereof clearly mentions that plaster of paris … the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004)(via)(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with … the Act; (ii) penalty should not be imposed under provisions of Rule 15(1) of the Credit Rules on account of Cenvat Credit wrongly taken and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial