Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff amendment act 2004 chapter xlvii · Page 1 of about 39 results (0.061 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … regard under the primary and main Rule 1 of the Interpretative Rules. 47 18. M/s. Moreshwar and other job workers:- In the light of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … regard under the primary and main Rule 1 of the Interpretative Rules. 47 18. M/s. Moreshwar and other job workers:- In the light of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2018

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs.commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2018

Subject : Service Tax

the Credit Rules. Alleging that the assessees in their return had omitted to give any 'chapter heading' under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of the said goods in providing output service. Information, about use of the goods and … In all these appeals, preferred under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereafter referred as the “Excise Act”) and Section 83 of the … by the circular, we agree with the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the assessee that the amendment under Notification No.25/96, dated 31-8-1996 has to be read only as clarificatory and retrospective effect has to be … capital goods in terms of Rule 2(a)(A)(iii), of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (hereafter “the Credit Rules”) regardless of whether those components, spares and accessories … failed to CEAC122016 and other connected matter Page 47 of 67 consider the decision of the AP

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2005

Castrol India Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 5A, 5A(4); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8, 8(1), 8(2); Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs and Central Excise Law (Amendment) Act, 1987

Reported in : 2005(99)ECC167; 2005(181)ELT367(SC); JT2005(3)SC13; (2005)3SCC30

Central Excise Rules 1944, and in force immediately before the commencement of the Customs and Central Excise Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 shall be deemed to have been issued or made under the provisions of this Section and shall … the assessee-appellant. The judgment is reported in 2000 (123) ELT 789 Tribunal (Castrol India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta-I).2. The factual position in a nutshell is as follows:The appellant is engaged, inter alia, in the manufacture … (in short the 'Rules') provided for exemption. The Notification No. 120/84-CE was issued on 11.5.1984 when the earlier Excise Tariff was a part of the First Schedule of the Act. The said notification exempted blended and compounded lubricating … was introduced which introduced a new tariff in Chapter 27 w.e.f. 1.3.1986 under the Tariff Act. Section … - Others.'13. In Collector of Customs, Bangalore v. Maestro Motors Ltd. : 2004(174)ELT289(SC), this Court held as follows:'It is settled law that to avail the … Rs. 19,83,411.76 Nilto31.1.1993------------------------------------------------------------------Total Rs. 71,04,159.47------------------------------------------------------------------2. 28.1.1994 7.1.1989 Rs. 47,59,343.40 Rs. 30to lakhs31.7.1991------------------------------------------------------------------5. Assessee preferred two appeals before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

for the said period it was found that the appellant had failed to give any ‘chapter heading under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of said goods in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and … fact is further clarified by the Central Government in Notification No.221/96, as amended by Notification No.89/89. Item 6 thereof clearly mentions that plaster of paris … the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004)(via)(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with … (AP)) 46Collector of C.E. Vs. Jay Engineering Works Ltd., (1989(39) E.L.T. 169(S.C.) 47. M/s. Annapurna Carbon Industries Co. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1976) 2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2023

Commr.of Cen.exc.ahmedabad Vs. M/s Urmin Products P.ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2023

Subject : Service Tax

ISSUED UNDER CE ACT1 Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff in 2004-05 (6 Digit Code).2. Notification No.13/2002 - CE (NT) dated 01.03.2002 under Section … No.Abbreviation 1. “BIS” Bureau of Indian Standards 2. “CBIC” Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs 3. “CETA” Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 7 4. “CE ACTCentral Excise Act, 1944 5. “CET SH” Central Excise Tariff Sub-Heading 6. … apt and appropriate to extract Section 11A as it stood in 1980, and as it stood after the amendment brought in 2000 and by Act 10 of 2000 (w.e.f. 17.11.1980) and subsequent substitution by Act 8 of … firstly, the assessee itself right from the beginning has been consistently declaring 47 the product manufactured by it as ‘chewing tobacco’ till the 8-digit regime

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2019

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ltu, Delhi vs.nangalama ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2019

Subject : Service Tax

of the following Additional Note to the General Rule of Interpretation of the Schedule, in respect of the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004, whereby “electrical energy” was introduced in Chapter 27 of the Tariff: “(c) “tariff item” means a description of … Modvat Credit, of the input used to generate electricity, could not be availed. CEAC192017 Page 37 of 49 47. Dealing with the contention, the Supreme Court, in para 8 of the report, commenced with a clarification that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2023

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

new tariff entries under Chapters 30 and 33 as under: - “OLD ENTRIES (as per Central Excise Tariff, 2004): Chapter 30:30. 03 Medicaments (including veterinary medicaments). 3003.10 - Patent or proprietary medicaments, other than those medicaments which are … Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required to be classified as ‘cosmetic’ … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … of the appellant is acceptable that it is primarily for therapeutic use.” 47 13. The same would be the position in the present case. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2010

Commissioner of Customs C.G.O. Vs. Sonam International Shop No.9

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-07-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

conforms with the description of goods mentioned under heading No.26.36 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 48.Under the heading No.29.36, Vitamin has been defined as under: "Vitamins are active agents, usually of … different identity under the Customs Tariff, while the former is classifiable under Chapter 29, the latter is classifiable under Chapter 23. 18.Under Explanatory Note to … that where the bill of entry is returned for payment of duty before the commencement of the Customs (Amendment) Act, 1991 and the importer has not paid such duty before such commencement, the date of return of such … (28) E.L.T. 63 (Bom.) Union of India and others. v. Popular Dyechem; 2004 (170) E.L.T. 252 (Tri.-Del.): Kalinga Gases. v. Commissioner of Customs, Lucknow; 2000 … the provisions contained in Sections 17, 46 and 47 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Bill of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2007

R.K. Refineries and Metal (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. General Manager, India ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-08-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2(1), 3, 11B, 11B(2) and 35; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 56A, 57 and 57A

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN18

a declaration that C.N. Dross comes under sub-heading No. 2620.00 of Chapter 26 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and it comes within the purview of exemption of Central Excise Duty in terms of Notification … purview of exemption of Central Excise Duty in terms of Notification No. 19/88/CE dated March 1, 1988 as amended by Notification No. 27/91/CE dated July 25, 1991. In the writ application there is a further prayer for … Excise, Patna v. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. reported in : 2004(165)ELT386(SC) , Mr. Dutta submits that 'zinc Dross, flux skimming' and 'zinc sealing',

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial