Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff amendment act 2004 chapter xlv · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Note 3 to Chapter 33 for classification as 'Hair Oil, Other' are 45 satisfied, then the product has to be classified only under Heading ...33

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Note 3 to Chapter 33 for classification as 'Hair Oil, Other' are 45 satisfied, then the product has to be classified only under Heading ...33

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2023

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

new tariff entries under Chapters 30 and 33 as under: - “OLD ENTRIES (as per Central Excise Tariff, 2004): Chapter 30:30. 03 Medicaments (including veterinary medicaments). 3003.10 - Patent or proprietary medicaments, other than those medicaments which are … Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required to be classified as ‘cosmetic’ … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … (P) Ltd. v. CCE [(2006) 3 SCC266, State of Goa v. Colfax 45 Laboratories Ltd. [(2004) 9 SCC83 and B.P.L. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. CCE [1995

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 03 2005

Commr. of Cus. (Airport) Vs. Skycell Communications Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jan-03-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(181)ELT275Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2018

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs.commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2018

Subject : Service Tax

the Credit Rules. Alleging that the assessees in their return had omitted to give any 'chapter heading' under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of the said goods in providing output service. Information, about use of the goods and … In all these appeals, preferred under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereafter referred as the “Excise Act”) and Section 83 of the … by the circular, we agree with the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the assessee that the amendment under Notification No.25/96, dated 31-8-1996 has to be read only as clarificatory and retrospective effect has to be … capital goods in terms of Rule 2(a)(A)(iii), of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (hereafter “the Credit Rules”) regardless of whether those components, spares and accessories … was used CEAC122016 and other connected matter Page 45 of 67 in the actual process of manufacture

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2006

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. Shri M. Naushad, Appraiser of

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Sep-15-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(114)ECC379

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2007

Rinl Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : May-14-2007

Subject : Service Tax

engaged in the manufacture of iron and steel products falling under Chapter 72 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and had been exporting the products manufactured by them in terms of the Value Based Advance … and Ors. 2005 (67) RLT 488 (Guj)Nestle India Ltd., v. CCE Chandigarh-II 2004 (176) ELT 314 (Tri-Del).4. The second contention raised by the appellant is … the materials permitted for import. It is their contention that the Govt later on removed the contention by amending the Notification No. 204/92 by the issue of Notification No. 32/98 Cus dated 4.6.98 clarifying that the restriction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2014

Cce, Chandigarh Vs. Ramesh Gupta, Partner

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Mar-20-2014

Subject : Excise

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2019

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ltu, Delhi vs.nangalama ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2019

Subject : Service Tax

of the following Additional Note to the General Rule of Interpretation of the Schedule, in respect of the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004, whereby “electrical energy” was introduced in Chapter 27 of the Tariff: “(c) “tariff item” means a description of … becoming “non-excisable”. To the extent that the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad, in Gularia CEAC192017 Page 45 of 49 Chini Mills8 opines to the contrary, therefore, we respectfully record our disagreement.58. Our disagreement on this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2023

Commr.of Cen.exc.ahmedabad Vs. M/s Urmin Products P.ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2023

Subject : Service Tax

ISSUED UNDER CE ACT1 Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff in 2004-05 (6 Digit Code).2. Notification No.13/2002 - CE (NT) dated 01.03.2002 under Section … No.Abbreviation 1. “BIS” Bureau of Indian Standards 2. “CBIC” Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs 3. “CETA” Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 7 4. “CE ACTCentral Excise Act, 1944 5. “CET SH” Central Excise Tariff Sub-Heading 6. … apt and appropriate to extract Section 11A as it stood in 1980, and as it stood after the amendment brought in 2000 and by Act 10 of 2000 (w.e.f. 17.11.1980) and subsequent substitution by Act 8 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial