Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff amendment act 2004 chapter xlix · Page 1 of about 51 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 31 2019

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ltu, Delhi vs.nangalama ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2019

Subject : Service Tax

of the following Additional Note to the General Rule of Interpretation of the Schedule, in respect of the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004, whereby “electrical energy” was introduced in Chapter 27 of the Tariff: “(c) “tariff item” means a description of … Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) in Excise Appeals Nos. E/3753/2012 and E/3949/2012. CEAC192017 Page 1 of 49 Statutory Backdrop 2. Before proceeding to the facts of the case, it would be apposite to chart the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … oil manufactured by M/s. MAIPL is suitable for use as 'Hair Oil'. 49 The very nature of packing shows that the product is meant to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … oil manufactured by M/s. MAIPL is suitable for use as 'Hair Oil'. 49 The very nature of packing shows that the product is meant to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 18 2024

Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem versus M/S Madhan Agro Industrie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.893

SCR 125 : (2006) 5 SCC 208 - referred to. List of Acts Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004; Central Excise Act, 1944; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Edible Oils Packaging … First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Headnotes† Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - First Schedule, Chapter 15, Section III, Heading 1513, titled ‘Coconut (Copra) oil, etc.’; Chapter 33 Section VI Heading 3305, titled ‘Preparations … classifiable as ‘hair oil’ under Heading 3305 in Section VI-Chapter 33 thereof. 49. The impugned orders, holding to that effect, therefore do not brook interference

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2023

Commr.of Cen.exc.ahmedabad Vs. M/s Urmin Products P.ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2023

Subject : Service Tax

ISSUED UNDER CE ACT1 Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff in 2004-05 (6 Digit Code).2. Notification No.13/2002 - CE (NT) dated 01.03.2002 under Section … No.Abbreviation 1. “BIS” Bureau of Indian Standards 2. “CBIC” Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs 3. “CETA” Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 7 4. “CE ACTCentral Excise Act, 1944 5. “CET SH” Central Excise Tariff Sub-Heading 6. … 20 ii. Submissions of Parties 20 29 iii. Discussion and Finding 29 49 2. Commissioner Of Central Excise, Chandigarh v. M/S. Flakes-N-Flavourz [ C. A. … apt and appropriate to extract Section 11A as it stood in 1980, and as it stood after the amendment brought in 2000 and by Act 10 of 2000 (w.e.f. 17.11.1980) and subsequent substitution by Act 8 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2006

Kitex Garments Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Jul-27-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(208)ELT137Tri(Bang.)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2006

Nokia (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2014

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-iv Vs. Celebity Designs India ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-2014

Subject : Excise

are that the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of textile articles falling under Chapter 62 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents filed a refund claim on 29.3.2005 of Rs.12,76,088/- under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit … of the period specified in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Subsequently, Notification No.11/2002 (supra) was amended by Notification No.49/2003-CE (NT) dt. 17.5.2003 and the claim for such refund may be made for each calendar … Rules for the goods exported during the month of February and March 2004. The respondents availed cenvat credit on various inputs which were utilized in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

for the said period it was found that the appellant had failed to give any ‘chapter heading under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of said goods in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and … fact is further clarified by the Central Government in Notification No.221/96, as amended by Notification No.89/89. Item 6 thereof clearly mentions that plaster of paris … the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004)(via)(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with … are not informed at the Bar that the judgment in BSNL (2012) 49 VST 98 (AP) has either been stayed or appealed against or the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2018

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs.commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2018

Subject : Service Tax

the Credit Rules. Alleging that the assessees in their return had omitted to give any 'chapter heading' under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of the said goods in providing output service. Information, about use of the goods and … In all these appeals, preferred under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereafter referred as the “Excise Act”) and Section 83 of the … by the circular, we agree with the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the assessee that the amendment under Notification No.25/96, dated 31-8-1996 has to be read only as clarificatory and retrospective effect has to be … capital goods in terms of Rule 2(a)(A)(iii), of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (hereafter “the Credit Rules”) regardless of whether those components, spares and accessories … tower site) CEAC122016 and other connected matter Page 49 of 67 57. In the present case, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial