Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … that the coconut oil is meant or intended for used as hair 14 oil. In this regard, Shri Bagaria has also drawn the attention of

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … that the coconut oil is meant or intended for used as hair 14 oil. In this regard, Shri Bagaria has also drawn the attention of

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

new tariff entries under Chapters 30 and 33 as under: - “OLD ENTRIES (as per Central Excise Tariff, 2004): Chapter 30:30. 03 Medicaments (including veterinary medicaments). 3003.10 - Patent or proprietary medicaments, other than those medicaments which are … Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required to be classified as ‘cosmetic’ … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … Oil”4 could not be classified as ‘medicament’ under Tariff Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Vicco Laboratories

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Central Excises (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 118

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)453; 2008(2)CTC511; 2007(123)ECC278; 2007(149)LC278(SC); 2007(218)ELT647(SC); (2008)4MLJ1272(SC); 2007(3)SCALE481

Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (in short the 'Act') as amended by Act 40/1991.5. On 28th February, 1986, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short Tariff Act') was introduced, to be effective from 1st March, 1986. Under the Old … the provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (in short the 'Act') as amended by Act 40/1991.5. On 28th February, 1986, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short Tariff Act') was introduced, … 7896-97/2003 disposed of by a three-Judge Bench by order dated December 7, 2004. The High Court accepted the position that normally the High Court should … Act, the product was sought to be classified by the respondent under Chapter 30 sub-heading 3003.30 and the same was approved by Assistant Commissioner, Nagpur, … Court while disposing of the said application.8. On 14.5.2001 with reference to the 3rd SCNs, the Deputy

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S Federal Mogul Tpr India Lim ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

under the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), as amended by the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 (5 of 2005), on which appropriate duty of excise is payable. Explanation - For the purpose of this … (FMTPR) holders of Central Excise Registration Certificate is engaged in the manufacture of piston rings etc., falling under Chapter 84 of Central Excise Tariff, 1985. It is the case of the Department that on information gathered from … amounting to Rs.2,02,00,275/- to the principal manufacturer i.e., FMTPR much against the 14 exemption notification No.8 of 2005 is not worthy of acceptance. As we

Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ltu, Delhi vs.nangalama ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

of the following Additional Note to the General Rule of Interpretation of the Schedule, in respect of the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004, whereby “electrical energy” was introduced in Chapter 27 of the Tariff: “(c) “tariff item” means a description of … as the case may be sub-rule (3A), it shall be recovered, in the manner as provided in rule 14, for recovery of CENVAT credit wrongly taken. the duty of excise (4) No CENVAT credit shall be allowed

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. A.R.S. Company Ltd. and Azam

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(112)ECC178

that they retain the character of dried fruit or dried nuts.11. With effect from 28.02.05, schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act was restructured while assigning eight digit classification to different commodities covered by the tariff. In the statement … Chapter Subheading 21062 to 0802 9019. They had made the request in the wake of enactment of CETA (Amendment) Act, 2004 on 28.02.05. CSH 21062 hitherto adopted by the appellants reads as betel nut product known as supari, whereas

The India Cements Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

not retrospective?.".2. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under Chapter 25 of Central Excise Tariff Act, (CETA) 1985. Admittedly, the assessee availed the benefit of modvat credit provided under Rule 57Q of the … number. Since Heading No.84.74 was excluded from the list of eligible capital goods till 31.08.1996 when under the amendment to Rule 57Q by Notification No.25/96 NT dated 31.08.1996, goods under Heading 84.74 were once again brought under

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Hoganas I ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 6, 9, 8, 18, 19, 28, 28(1), 37(2), 111, 112, 113, 114, 114A, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 124, 123, 125, 125(2), 127A, 127B, 127B(1), 127C(1), 127C(3), 127C(6), 127C(7), 127C(9), 127C(11), 127D, 127E, 127H, 127H(1), 127H(3), 127I(1) and 245A; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs (Amendment) Act, 1998; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245C, 245C(1), 245D and 245D(1); Finance Act - Sections 13; Customs Rules - Rules 10, 10A and 18A; Customs (Settlement of Cases) Rules 1999; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Indian Penal Code; Income Tax Law

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR61; 2006(199)ELT8(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel, ;P.S. Jetley and ;K.R. Chaudhary, Advs. in W.P. No. 115/2004, ;A.J. Rana, Sr. Counsel and ;K.J. Presswala, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 1636 and 9995/2004, ;V. Shreedharan, Sr. Counsel an D.B. Shroff, ;Rustomjee and ;Arman Dalal, Advs., i/b., Croford Bayley & Co. in W.P. No. 115/2004, ;C. Harishankar and ;S.N. Kantawala, Advs., i/b., Yogesh Rohira, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 1636 and 9995/

Dinesh Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Servic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff Act’, for short) manufactured through job workers.3. On 25.03.2003 Rule 12B was inserted in … The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff … was amended as under: S. No.(1) 1. Notification No.and date (2) 34/2003- Central Excise, dated the 30th April, Amendments (3) In the said notification, - (i) for the words “thirty lakh rupees” wherever they occur, the words … of Rule 12B.” 7. During the period from April 2003 to January 2004 the Appellants had cleared cotton fabrics to the tune of Rs.1,70,12,745/- and … show cause notices were issued on 07.07.2004 and 14.01.2005 by the Department demanding duty of Rs.12,28,801/- (BED)