Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … on the system of classification from the international convention called the Brussels 69 Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (Harmonized System of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … on the system of classification from the international convention called the Brussels 69 Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (Harmonized System of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
for the said period it was found that the appellant had failed to give any ‘chapter heading under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of said goods in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and … fact is further clarified by the Central Government in Notification No.221/96, as amended by Notification No.89/89. Item 6 thereof clearly mentions that plaster of paris … the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004)(via)(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with … Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court the assessee was registered under Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 for providing storage and warehouse services. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-29-2006
Service Tax
Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944
(2007)7VST197(MP)
Matched in: Advocate Kunal Thakre and ;Akshat Sharma, Advs.;H.S. Shrivastava, Sr. Counsel, ;Girish Shrivastava and ;Vijay Raghav Singh, Advs. Dharmendra Sharma, Addl. Solicitor General and ;O.P. Namdeo, GA for UOI, Commissioner, Central Excise and ;Sanjay Yadav, Dy. AG
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH and R Jhonson (India) Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority Ministry of
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-19-2005
Land Acquisition
(2005)(185)ELT125TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Bayir Extracts Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Gani Natural Colors a ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Mar-08-2012
Excise
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe India Cements Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Chennai
Jun-27-2013
Excise
not retrospective?.".2. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under Chapter 25 of Central Excise Tariff Act, (CETA) 1985. Admittedly, the assessee availed the benefit of modvat credit provided under Rule 57Q of the … number. Since Heading No.84.74 was excluded from the list of eligible capital goods till 31.08.1996 when under the amendment to Rule 57Q by Notification No.25/96 NT dated 31.08.1996, goods under Heading 84.74 were once again brought under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarsh International and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-01-2007
Land Acquisition
(2007)(122)ECC193
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaymond Limited, Under Companies Act, 1956 and Mr. Vasant Naag of Navi ...
Mumbai
Jun-16-2009
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Cenvat Credit Rules
2009(5)BomCR174; 2009(111)BomLR2444; 2009(167)LC7(Bombay); 2009(240)ELT180(Bom)
who manufactures goods falling under Tariff Heading 55.06 from duty paid inputs falling under Heading 55.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('CET' for short) is entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 30/2004 dated 9/7/2004 is the … top process'.6. Excise duty payable on various textile goods are enumerated in Chapters 50 to 63 of the CET. Chapter 55 of the CET with … in detail in the Explanatory Notes. You would appreciate that number of changes have been carried out through amendments in notifications, rules and Acts. Though every care has been taken to reflect the intention of the Government
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouthern Iron and Steel Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-05-2007
Land Acquisition
(2007)(118)ECC363
(SISCOL, importer-assessee) against the Order in Appeal No. 01/2006 CUS (SLM) dated 28.4.2006 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Salem. The facts of the case are that SISCOL had imported and warehoused in their private customs … no change in the nature of the goods or the tariff by amendments thereof. This aspect has been accepted by the Central Board as the … of Entry was Rs. 5,73,69,053/- and that the goods were classifiable under heading No. 49.06 of the Customs Tariff and exempt under Notification No. 21/02 Cus dt. 01.03.02. It was also stated in the said letter that … CCE, Delhi III v. Machino Montell (I) Ltd. 2004 (62) RLT 709 (CESTAT-LB) Section 72 and Section … designs and drawings, and claiming its classification under Chapter 49 as printed materials exempt from customs duty … the expiration of the warehousing period under Section 72 of the Customs Act, (ii) proposing to appropriate the same amount paid by SISCOL vide TR6
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »