Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Laboratories Ltd. (2004) 9 SCC83and B.P.L. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. CCE1995Supp (3) SCC1]. 62 35. However, there cannot be a static parameter for the correct classification
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Laboratories Ltd. (2004) 9 SCC83and B.P.L. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. CCE1995Supp (3) SCC1]. 62 35. However, there cannot be a static parameter for the correct classification
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Prashant Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jan-08-2004
MRTP
(2004)(173)ELT201Tri(Mum.)bai
Matched in: Citation (2004)(173)ELT201Tri(Mum.)bai
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-iv Vs. Celebity Designs India ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Mar-05-2014
Excise
are that the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of textile articles falling under Chapter 62 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents filed a refund claim on 29.3.2005 of Rs.12,76,088/- under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit … respondents are engaged in the manufacture of textile articles falling under Chapter 62 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents filed a refund … of the period specified in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Subsequently, Notification No.11/2002 (supra) was amended by Notification No.49/2003-CE (NT) dt. 17.5.2003 and the claim for such refund may be made for each calendar … Rules for the goods exported during the month of February and March 2004. The respondents availed cenvat credit on various inputs which were utilized in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaymond Limited, Under Companies Act, 1956 and Mr. Vasant Naag of Navi ...
Mumbai
Jun-16-2009
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Cenvat Credit Rules
2009(5)BomCR174; 2009(111)BomLR2444; 2009(167)LC7(Bombay); 2009(240)ELT180(Bom)
who manufactures goods falling under Tariff Heading 55.06 from duty paid inputs falling under Heading 55.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('CET' for short) is entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 30/2004 dated 9/7/2004 is the … top process'.6. Excise duty payable on various textile goods are enumerated in Chapters 50 to 63 of the CET. Chapter 55 of the CET with … in detail in the Explanatory Notes. You would appreciate that number of changes have been carried out through amendments in notifications, rules and Acts. Though every care has been taken to reflect the intention of the Government
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGem Granites Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Nov-23-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHB(2), 80HHC and 80HHC(2); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 89A and 89A(4); Finance (Amendment) Act, 1991
(2004)192CTR(SC)481; [2004]271ITR322(SC); 2004(9)SCALE647; (2005)1SCC289
Matched in: Citation (2004)192CTR(SC)481; [2004]271ITR322(SC); 2004(9)SCALE647; (2005)1SCC289
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii
Supreme Court of India
Aug-17-2009
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004
2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)
Maruti Suzuki Ltd. (appellant) is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared on payment of duty. Assessee claimed CENVAT credit on 'input' in … Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under Section 91 read with Section 93 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004);(vii) the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the … 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 or 63 of the First Schedule to the Tariff Act, may, at … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...
Supreme Court of India
May-03-2023
Land Acquisition
new tariff entries under Chapters 30 and 33 as under: - “OLD ENTRIES (as per Central Excise Tariff, 2004): Chapter 30:30. 03 Medicaments (including veterinary medicaments). 3003.10 - Patent or proprietary medicaments, other than those medicaments which are … Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required to be classified as ‘cosmetic’ … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … Medica by John Henry Clarke; B. Jain publishers (P) Ltd., New Delhi. 62 anxiety to somehow hold the product in question as cosmetic, the Adjudicating
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur Vs. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bh ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2009
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944
2009(164)LC101(SC); 2009(237)ELT225(SC); JT2009(6)SC29; 2009(5)SCALE396; (2009)12SCC419; 2009(3)LC1456(SC); (2009)12VatReporter39:2009AIRSCW3788
short). While Baidyanath contends that the product DML is a medicament under Chapter Sub- heading 3003.31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the stand of the Department is that the said product is a cosmetic/toiletry preparation/tooth powder classifiable … (5) Meghdoot Gramodyog Sewa Sansthan v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow : 2004 (174) ELT 14 SC.20. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, learned senior counsel for the … by way of representation putting forth the plea that after the introduction of New Tariff Act and the amendments made in 1996, there is a specific definition of Ayurvedic Medicine and hence classification of its product DML … March 1, 1978, the Central Government issued an Exemption Notification bearing No. 62/78-CE whereby exemption was extended to '...all drugs, medicines, pharmaceuticals and drug intermediates
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVodafone Mobile Services Limited vs.commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi
Delhi
Oct-31-2018
Service Tax
the Credit Rules. Alleging that the assessees in their return had omitted to give any 'chapter heading' under Central Excise Tariff nor the use of the said goods in providing output service. Information, about use of the goods and … In all these appeals, preferred under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereafter referred as the “Excise Act”) and Section 83 of the … by the circular, we agree with the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the assessee that the amendment under Notification No.25/96, dated 31-8-1996 has to be read only as clarificatory and retrospective effect has to be … capital goods in terms of Rule 2(a)(A)(iii), of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (hereafter “the Credit Rules”) regardless of whether those components, spares and accessories … final product. CEAC122016 and other connected matter Page 62 of 67 8. The land was taken on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »