Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … 2009 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ...APPELLANT VERSUS MADHAN AGRO INDUSTRIES (I) PVT. LTD. ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.67036710 OF 2009 J U D G M
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in classification still persists, then the other rules for Interpretation may be resorted to (iii).9. CHANGES BROUGHT42IN BY CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2004:- Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004 which came into force with effect from 28.02.2005 brought in significant changes … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … 2009 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ...APPELLANT VERSUS MADHAN AGRO INDUSTRIES (I) PVT. LTD. ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.67036710 OF 2009 J U D G M
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Salem versus M/S Madhan Agro Industrie ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-18-2024
Land Acquisition
[2024]12S.C.R.893
SCR 125 : (2006) 5 SCC 208 - referred to. List of Acts Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004; Central Excise Act, 1944; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Edible Oils Packaging … First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Headnotes† Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - First Schedule, Chapter 15, Section III, Heading 1513, titled ‘Coconut (Copra) oil, etc.’; Chapter 33 Section VI Heading 3305, titled ‘Preparations … Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem v. M/s Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 1766 of 2009) 18 December 2024 [Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...
Mumbai
Dec-14-2012
Excise
have been allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight digit … the period from 1st June 1998 to 30th November 1999 on the ground that fresh mushrooms classifiable under Chapter 7 heading No.0701.00 were liable to pay Nil rate of duty under the Central Excise Tariff but as … April 1997. The dispute in the present case, relates to the duty liability in respect of DTA clearances of fresh mushrooms effected by the assessee.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindal Co Industries Limited Vs. The Union of India
Mumbai
Dec-08-2014
Excise
Petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing of aluminum sheets, foils falling under Chapter sub -heading 76071190 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The major raw material for aluminum sheets/foils is aluminium ingots. In the course of manufacturing of … in : 1995 (77) E. L. T 268 (SC) are nullified with the change in law. With the amendment in section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the produce aluminium dross and skimming are deemed to … Central Excise vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., reported in : 2004 (165) E. L. T 386 (SC). Mr. Sridharan therefore submits that all
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ltu, Delhi vs.nangalama ...
Delhi
Oct-31-2019
Service Tax
of the following Additional Note to the General Rule of Interpretation of the Schedule, in respect of the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 2004, whereby “electrical energy” was introduced in Chapter 27 of the Tariff: “(c) “tariff item” means a description of … on:24. h October, 2019 Pronounced on:31. t October, 2019 + CEAC192017 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX LTU, DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr. Aman Rewaria, Ms. Seema Dolo and Ms. Vipasha
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii
Supreme Court of India
Aug-17-2009
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004
2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)
Maruti Suzuki Ltd. (appellant) is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared on payment of duty. Assessee claimed CENVAT credit on 'input' in … Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under Section 91 read with Section 93 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004);(vii) the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated. … S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Leave granted.FACTS IN THE LEAD MATTER2. The issue in the present civil appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommr.of Cen.exc.ahmedabad Vs. M/s Urmin Products P.ltd. .
Supreme Court of India
Oct-20-2023
Service Tax
ISSUED UNDER CE ACT1 Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff in 2004-05 (6 Digit Code).2. Notification No.13/2002 - CE (NT) dated 01.03.2002 under Section … No.Abbreviation 1. “BIS” Bureau of Indian Standards 2. “CBIC” Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs 3. “CETA” Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 7 4. “CE ACT’ Central Excise Act, 1944 5. “CET SH” Central Excise Tariff Sub-Heading 6. … apt and appropriate to extract Section 11A as it stood in 1980, and as it stood after the amendment brought in 2000 and by Act 10 of 2000 (w.e.f. 17.11.1980) and subsequent substitution by Act 8 of … 2010 COMMR. OF CEN. EXC. AHMEDABAD …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S URMIN PRODUCTS P. LTD. AND OTHERS … RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.6513-6519 OF2023(@ DIARY NO.6888 OF2020
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sony India (P) Ltd.
Authority for Advance Rulings
Apr-15-2004
Excise
(2004)(167)ELT28AAR
Matched in: Citation (2004)(167)ELT28AAR
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs and C.E.Nagpur Vs. M/S. Ispat Industries Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-07-2015
Excise
of H.R. sheets/coils, C.R. sheets/coils, and Galvanized/colour coated/sheets, falling under Chapter 72 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Intelligence revealed that M/s Ispat were indulging in evasion of central excise duty by a mis-declaration … OF2007COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS …APPELLANT AND CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR VERSUS M/S. ISPAT INDUSTRIES LTD. …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. The issue involved in the present appeal … no further. So far as the second period is concerned, after Section 4 was substituted completely by the Amendment Act which came into force on 1.7.2000, even a depot or other premises could not be considered to be … M/s. Emco Ltd., dated July 31, 2015 in Civil Appeal 3418 of 2004 and Civil Appeal 8966 of 2011, and CCE & Customs v. Roofit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »