Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 96 · Page 1 of about 488 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 23 2002

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-23-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT537Tri(Mum.)bai

is then manufacture of P.D. Pumps. Thus the assessee captively consumes Copper Wire classifiable under Chapter 85.44 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Sr. No. 84.1 of the Notfn. No. 8/96 84 & 85 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 captively

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2007

Lhoist India Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on : Aug-30-2007

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2007)(123)ECC358

and some impurities - Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - S.H.s 2522, 2825 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Ruling sought on as to what should be the classification with respect to the finished product i.e. … classifications of the high purity burnt lime in the First Schedule to the Tariff Act are 2522 under Chapter 25 and 2825 in Chapter 28 - Chapter 25 cover Salt; sulphur; earths and stone; plastering materials; lime … have traces of certain impurities. While calcium oxide would comprise 94 to 96% of the product, the other elements/compounds present in it would be magnesium

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2005

O.K. Play (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-03-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A(1) and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 20; Tariff Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2005SC1023; 2005(98)ECC609; 2005(180)ELT300(SC); JT2005(1)SC648; (2005)2SCC460; [2005] 1 SCR 1086

aircraft, trains etc. which are reproductions of Articles. It is important to note that Section XX of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as 'the 1985 Act') covers Chapters Nos.94, 95 and 96 … the Central Excise Act, 1944, is - whether the assessee was right in classifying the following articles under Chapter Heading 95.03 and clearing the same without payment of duty. The said articles are Activity Desks and Chairs,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 2005

Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-12-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2005SC4101; 2005(99)ECC713; 2005(183)ELT123(SC); JT2005(4)SC270; (2005)4SCC194

case may be, and falling with the Chapter, heading No. or sub-heading No. of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) (hereinafter referred to as the said Schedule), specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) … which reads as follows:'Notification No. 5/98-C.E., dated 2-6-1998Effective rate of duty for specified goods of Chapters 13 to 96In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2000

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Fykays Engg. P. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-25-2000

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(69)ECC495

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2010

Commissioner of Central, Exices and Customs. Vs. M/S. Shital Internati ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-22-2010

Subject : Service Tax

the goods manufactured by the assessee were "unprocessed knitted pile fabrics" classifiable under chapter sub-heading 6001.12 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short "the Tariff Act"), attracting Nil rate of duty.2. Since the question of law arising for our

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2005

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Suvidha Appliances Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-01-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(189)ELT107Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2002

Ramoji Rao Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT494Tri(Bang.)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2002

Minwool Rock Fibres Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-22-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC336

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1998

Gulshan Sugar and Chemicals Works Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-10-1998

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1999)(63)ECC472

has classified uncoated variety under sub-heading 2836.90 and coated variety under sub-heading 3823.00 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act. 1985. The relevant classification lists are SI. No. 22 and 23/CL/IM/93-94 effective from 1st March. 1994.2. We have heard … has a specific use 1(h) are excluded from Chapter 25 and fall under Chapter 95 (Billiard chalk) or Chapter 96 (Writing or Drawing chalk and Tailor's chalk). The product in dispute is not a mineral substance and therefore,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial