Advanced Search Results

The Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujch ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 53, 223B, 9(2); Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 34,6

various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing modvat facility under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (herein after for … stated thus :The Respondents herein are engaged in manufacture of various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing … should not be demanded and recovered from the said assessee under Rule 9(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with proviso to Section 11A of

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Mrf Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1990)(29)ECC315

that case was an adhesive based on rubber compound and therefore, it appropriately fell under Heading 35.06 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. This heading, it may also be mentioned at this stage was introduced in Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 … 1.01 On 3-3-1986 the respondents herein filed a classification list No.5/85-86 claiming classification of 'vulcanising solution' under Chapter sub-heading 4006.90. This classification list was given approval by the Assistant Collector on 10-6-1986.1.02 Subsequently as per advice … as to what would be the classification during the period 1-11-1986 to 9-2-1987 for the purpose of the present matter. The contending entries under Central

Sakthi Masala Private Ltd. Rep. by Its Manager M. Nachiyappan Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A(1) and 11AC; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Companies Act; Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rule 25; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173B and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(129)ECC24; 2008(155)LC24(Madras); (2008)6MLJ80

the Companies Act,1956 engaged in the manufacture and sale of various spices and other masala powders falling under Chapter 9 of the Central Excise Tariff Act,1985. As per the impugned show cause notice, the above said manufactured goods … branded Bajji Bonda Powder should not be classified under Sub Heading 2108.99 of erstwhile First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act,1985 and 2106.9099 of the present First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (ii) the goods viz.,

Orissa Cement Ltd. and anr. and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 49, 52A, 173B, 173C and 173G

Reported in : 1995(51)ECC90; 1995(80)ELT255(Ori); 1995(II)OLR318

Matched in: Advocate G. Rath and A. Parija A.B. Mishra, Sr. Standing Counsel (Central)

Bamni Proteins Limited Vs. Ajay (Shri)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of CourtExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR744

to why the Di-Calcium Phosphate (Animal Feed Grade) should not be classified under Chapter Sub-heading No. 2835.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, attracting Central Excise Duty @ 6 per cent ad valorem and why the Central Excise Duty to the … Duty to the tune of Rs. 29,16,883/- should not be demanded and recovered from the petitioner under Rule 9(2) read with section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, along with penalty.4. Being aggrieved by the said

Wipro Ltd. and Panchajanya Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)(71)ECC326

(c) that bathing bars (soaps containing less than 60% TFM merit classification under Chapter sub-heading 3307.39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (d) and that as per the Quality Control reports of the appellants the said 'Santoor Soaps' contain TFM … Excise Officers but only State Drug Control Licensing Authorities. They also relied on the CBEC Circular No. 360/76/ 97-CX dated 3.12.97 which relied on the Law Ministry's advice, which overruled the application of Circular under Drugs &

Puma Ayurvedic Herbal (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Central Excise, Nagpu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Central Excise Act

Reported in : AIR2006SC1561; 2006(196)ELT3(SC); JT2006(3)SC354; 2006(3)SCALE141; (2006)3SCC266; [2006]145STC200(SC)

of medicaments or cosmetics. Answer to this question determines as to whether the goods are classifiable under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as cosmetics under Chapter 33 or as medicaments under Chapter 30. As cosmetics the rate of excise duty … and all its ingredients were said to be Ayurvedic which were found in Ayurveda text books. It had 98% Til oil and 2% Camphor, Amla and Chandan (sandalwood). It was found that all the ingredients of the

Shri Krishna Polyurethane Ind. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(102)ELT162TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Dinesh Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Servic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff Act’, for short) manufactured through job workers.3. On 25.03.2003 Rule 12B was inserted in Central Excise … rejecting application seeking rectification of mistake.2. The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff Act’, for short) manufactured through job … with any of the provisions of these rule except that of rule 9 : Provided further that the job worker may make an option to

Shantilal Doshi Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1991)LC397Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi