Advanced Search Results

Shri Krishna Polyurethane Ind. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(102)ELT162TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi Vs. Hindustan Sanitaryware and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Traiff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1)

Reported in : AIR2002SC3162; 2002LC569(SC); 2002(145)ELT3(SC); JT2002(7)SC17; 2002(6)SCALE380; (2002)7SCC515; [2002]SUPP2SCR224

appearing for the Revenue, contends that as the moulds of plaster of paris are goods classified under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 they cannot be treated as inputs; they must be treated as the final product and as they are … 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 91, 92, … THE TABLE '............................................................................S.No. Description of Description ofInputs final products................................................................................1. Goods classifiable Goods classifiableunder any headings under any headingsof chapters 28, 29, of chapters 28, 29,30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37,

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. National Organic Chemical I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Constitution of India - Article 39

Reported in : 2008(134)ECC189; 2008(160)LC189(SC); 2008(232)ELT193(SC); 2008(14)SCALE540:2008AIRSCW7872.

propylene by cracking raw naphtha in a naphtha cracker. Ethylene and propylene fall under chapter 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tariff Act'). During the process of cracking raw naphtha, gases such as methane

Shakun Products Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1997)(96)ELT184TriDel

The assessees received PVC wires/insulated wires and insulated electric conductors classified under 8544.00 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 in their factory on payment of duty, these wires were cut to different sizes according to specifications and … Headings providing a more general description. Further since the items in dispute are in themselves goods included in Chapter 85 (sub-heading 8544.00) they are to be classified in that Heading, by virtue of Note 2(a) to Section … plugs to the distributor.The HSN Explanatory Notes to Section XVII (covering Chapters 86 to 89) Part 3, which deals with parts and accessories excludes "other

Upper India Steel Mfg. and Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A to 57J and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1990(27)ECC228; 1990(49)ELT22(P& H)

well as that of the final products which qualified for MOD VAT Credit Scheme. Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 deals with iron and steel. Heading 73.02, in particular, deals with 'waste and scrap of iron and steel'.

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Contr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A and 57Q

Reported in : 2008(125)ECC203; 2008(151)LC203(Madras)

Aluminium Company Ltd., is manufacturer of Aluminium and articles thereof falling under Chapter Heading No. 76 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It availed the credit of duty on 40 items to the tune of Rs. 77,21,450.41 declaring the same

Goa Bottiing Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1986; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR68

and making all excisable goods subject to duty at the rates provided in the Scheduled to the new Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Aerated waters falling under its Chapter 22, and further, Rules 57-A to 57-I were introduced in the Central

Jaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(83)ELT49TriDel

is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles … 84.82, and provided they constitute integral parts of engines or motors, articles of Heading No. 8483. Reference in Chapter 86 to 88 to parts or 'accessories' do not apply to parts or accessories which are not suitable for

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2000)(0)ELT00TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Konark Television Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1992(38)ECC1

goods. 'Excisable goods' has been defined in Section 2(d) to mean, goods specified in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as being subject to a duty of excise and includes salt. The expression 'final product' has not been … dispute.A Scheme was introduced with effect from 1st March, 1986, and a new Part 'AA' was added to Chapter-V of the Rules consisting of Rules 57A to 57J. The said Scheme is called the 'Modified Value Added