Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378

India Ltd., Faridabad, (M/s. FIL) manufactures air-conditioning and refrigerating machinery and appliances classifiable under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. Assessee cleared compressors falling under tariff sub-heading 8414.10. They also cleared to its buyers separately 'fly wheel' under

The India Cements Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

dated 31.08.1996 is not retrospective?.".2. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under Chapter 25 of Central Excise Tariff Act, (CETA) 1985. Admittedly, the assessee availed the benefit of modvat credit provided … rule 57Q- (i) in sub rule (1), - (a)... (b)... (d)following goods falling within the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) and used in the factory of the manufacturer- (i) all goods falling under heading Nos.84.02,

Crane Betel Nut Powder Works Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central E ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 11, 35E, 35G, 35G(1), 35H and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1957; Central Excise Tariff Rules - Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Customs Act - Sections 129C(3), 129D, 129D(5) and 130E; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 15(2) and 15(3A); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2006(2)ALT523

product of the Appellant under Chapter subheading No. 2107.00 instead of sub-heading No.0801.00 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, (hereinafter referred to as Tariff Act). The Appellant's contention that their products were required to be classified under … (1982)49 STC 79. Kota Steel Re- Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commercial Tax Officer (1982) 49 STC 80 (Rajasthan Division Bench), and Polar Marmo Agglomerates Ltd. v. Union of India (Rajasthan Division Bench). Learned counsel, placing

Plastipeel Chemicals and Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)LC395Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and ors.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(63)ECC709

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944

Reported in : (2007)7VST197(MP)

Matched in: Advocate Kunal Thakre and ;Akshat Sharma, Advs.;H.S. Shrivastava, Sr. Counsel, ;Girish Shrivastava and ;Vijay Raghav Singh, Advs. Dharmendra Sharma, Addl. Solicitor General and ;O.P. Namdeo, GA for UOI, Commissioner, Central Excise and ;Sanjay Yadav, Dy. AG

Forbes Gokak Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1995)(80)ELT801TriDel

Matched in: Citation (1995)(80)ELT801TriDel

Health India Laboratories Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2007)(116)ECC392

CSH 2108.99 (upto 27.2.05) and CSH 21069099 (from 28.2.05) of the Central Excise Tariff 1^st schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The order consequently demanded an amount of Rs. 4,93,87,230/- being duty and cess payable on the product cleared … juice. They argued that the product obtained by preparation of vegetables, fruits, nuts or plants was covered by Chapter 20 of the CETA schedule and specifically as fruit juices of CSH 200990. As per Rule 3(a) of … the appellants were under the bona fide belief that Indian Noni containing 80.12% of fruit and juice of leaf would fall only under the category

Thungabhadra Steel Products Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 1997(58)ECC26; 1998(98)ELT334(Kar); ILR1997KAR1301; 1997(3)KarLJ601

there was an amendment to the definition of goods by Act 5/1986 where the words 'Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' have been introduced. We are giving below the old Section 2 as well as new Section : - … the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Now, after amendment, the provision that has been made applicable is Chapter 7308.90. Tariff Item No. 69 of Schedule-I reads as 'all other goods, not elsewhere specified', while under Chapter

Hindustan Poles Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcut ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 6; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 9(1), 52A, 53, 54, 173B, 173C, 173G(1), 173G(2), 173G(4), 174 and 226

Reported in : 2006(196)ELT400(SC); JT2006(4)SC185; 2006(3)SCALE601; (2006)4SCC85; [2006]145STC625(SC)

specified in relation to any goods in the section or Chapter notes of [The First Schedule] to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) as amounting to [manufacture; or]The word 'manufacture' is a compound word of Latin origin derived