Advanced Search Results

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT537Tri(Mum.)bai

is then manufacture of P.D. Pumps. Thus the assessee captively consumes Copper Wire classifiable under Chapter 85.44 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Sr. No. 84.1 of the Notfn. No. 8/96 84 & 85 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 captively

Crane Betel Nut Powder Works Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central E ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 35B; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B

Reported in : 2007(116)ECC418; 2007LC418(SC); 2007(210)ELT171(SC); JT2007(4)SC485; 2007(4)SCALE472; (2007)4SCC155; [2007] 4 SCR 109

arrived at, it could no longer be contended that a new product had come into existence.7. Referring to Chapter 8 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Mr. Sorabjee submitted that the product of the appellant-company fell squarely … and the appellant was liable to pay duty at the appropriate rate specified in the chapter to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant-company went up in appeal against the said order of the Adjudicating Authority to the Commissioner of

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Goa Vs. Phil Corporation L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 2008(2)BomCR474; 2008(125)ECC111; 2008(151)LC111(SC); 2008(223)ELT9(SC); JT2008(2)SC239; 2008(2)SCALE260; 2008AIRSCW1394

the show cause notice and submitted that its products were correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 0801.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and chargeable to Nil rate of duty and hence there was no requirement to register with the Central … hulls (heading 14.04)(c) Ground-nuts (heading 12.02), roasted ground-nuts or peanut butter (heading 20.08)(d) Horse chestnuts (Aesculus hippocastanum) (heading 23.08).Chapter 8 does not include roasted ground nuts or peanuts.CHAPTER 20PREPARATIONS OF VEGETABLES, FRUIT, NUTS OR OTHER PARTS OF PLANTSChapter

M/S. Arihant Cotsyn Ltd. Vs. Cce, Chandigarh

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(75)ECC629

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Bamni Proteins Limited Vs. Ajay (Shri)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of CourtExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR744

to why the Di-Calcium Phosphate (Animal Feed Grade) should not be classified under Chapter Sub-heading No. 2835.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, attracting Central Excise Duty @ 6 per cent ad valorem and why the Central Excise Duty to the

Compack Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1) 56A, 57A and 57G

Reported in : AIR2006SC141; 2005(103)ECC1; 2005(189)ELT3(SC); JT2005(12)SC435; 2005(8)SCALE435; (2005)8SCC300

or folded cartons) whether in assembled or unassembled condition, falling within Chapter 48 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), from so much of the duty of excise leviable thereon as is in excess of … for printed cartons, boxes, containers and cases. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby exempts printed cartons, boxes, containers and cases (including

Commr. of Central Excise and Customs, Mumbai Vs. Bell Granito Ceramica ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11AB, 11AC and 35L; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2) and 173Q(1); Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR328; 2006(198)ELT161(SC); 2006(5)SCALE501; (2006)5SCC188

Revenue) and Ministry of Agriculture, there was therefore no justification to invoke large limitation period to impose penalty. CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT, 1985. Chapter 31 (Fertilisers), Note 6, Heading 31.05, Sub-Heading 3105.00 (Mineral or chemical fertilizers) & Chapter 38 (Miscellaneous chemical products), … impervious, mechanically stronger and resistant to scratching chemically more inert and more pleasing to the touch and eye'. 8. It is clear that verification and glazing are two distinct and separate processes - the former being a

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangaba ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A

Reported in : 1997(92)ELT23(SC); JT1997(10)SC737; (1997)9SCC681

the description specified in the Schedule hereto annexed and falling within Chapter 90 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon which is specified in the … used in Ophthalmic Surgery. By Notification No. 339/86-C.E., dated 11th June, 1986 issued under Sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, (hereinafter called the 'Rules') certain life saving equipments were exempt from the

Vicco Laboratories, Properietor Vicco Products Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 1991; New Tariff Act, 1985; Drugs Act; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(1)MhLj738

no good reason to change the classification merely on the ground of coming into force of the new Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 without establishing that the product has in fact changed its character.23. In Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta v. … In terms of the New Tariff Act, the product was sought to be classified by the petitioner under Chapter 30 subheading 3003.30 and the same was approved by A.C., Nagpur, by its order dated 6th October, 1986. … subject-matter of the petition. The respondents issued a show cause notice dated 8th November, 1976 requiring the petitioner to satisfy as to why the said

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Carrier Aircon Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 2 and 16; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11AB and 11AC; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2)

Reported in : 2006(199)ELT577(SC); JT2006(6)SC181; 2006(6)SCALE564; (2006)5SCC596; [2006]147STC421(SC); 2006(2)LC894(SC)

manufactured by it as refrigerating and freezing equipments under sub-heading No. 8418.10 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short the 'Tariff Act'). The classification list was accepted by the Department.3. Commissioner of Central Excise, Central … for consideration is as to:Whether the chillers manufactured by M/s. Carrier Aircon Limited (respondent herein) are classifiable under Chapter Heading 84.18 of the Schedule to the Central Tariff Act (for short 'the Act') as claimed by them … J.1. This judgment shall dispose off Civil Appeal Nos. 3914 of 2001, 8418 - 8419 of 2001, 4715 - 4717 of 2002 and 2898 of