Advanced Search Results

Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1991)LC217Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in “small containers” by the respondent(s)­assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Allahabad High Court in Marico Limited v. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, UP (2015) 78 VST423 23. Whether the Tribunal was right in classifying the impugned goods

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in “small containers” by the respondent(s)­assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Allahabad High Court in Marico Limited v. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, UP (2015) 78 VST423 23. Whether the Tribunal was right in classifying the impugned goods

Duratex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(139)ELT88TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Hindalco Industries Limited Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(0)ELT0TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(88)ELT465TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC85; 1997(89)ELT247(SC); JT1996(11)SC283; 1996(9)SCALE457; (1997)5SCC536; [1996]Supp10SCR585; [1998]111STC467(SC)

- by mis-interpreting or mis- applying the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 read with Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Tariff Act or by mis-interpreting or mis-applying any of the rules, … United States of America in United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co., 78 L.Ed. 859. Section 424 of the Revenue Act, 1928 provided that 'no … the same date and by the same Amendment Act (Act 25 of 1978), provides for refund of duties. Chapter-III deals with powers and duties of officers and land holders while Chapter-IV deals with transport by sea. Chapter-V

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur Vs. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : 2009(164)LC101(SC); 2009(237)ELT225(SC); JT2009(6)SC29; 2009(5)SCALE396; (2009)12SCC419; 2009(3)LC1456(SC); (2009)12VatReporter39:2009AIRSCW3788

short). While Baidyanath contends that the product DML is a medicament under Chapter Sub- heading 3003.31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the stand of the Department is that the said product is a cosmetic/toiletry preparation/tooth powder classifiable under Chapter

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Reckitt and Colman of India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1992)(42)LC38Tri(Delhi)

list the respondents had declared, among others, the following products under sub-heading numbers of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985:________________________________________________________________Sl. No. Product Sub heading No.1. Purity India Barely 1101.90 400 gm/100 gm/50 gm Tins2. Robinson's Patent Barely 1101.90 … Insulin, wheat gluten" which is akin to chapter 11 dealing with the above goods only under the CET Act 1985. Chapter sub-heading No. 11.01 of the Explanatory Notes covers products of milling industry including flours among others, of cereals.

Vikram Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 4; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32; Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Mining Act; Factories Act; Cenvat Credit Rules, 2000 - Rules 52A, 49(1) and 173G(1); Cenvat Credit (Amendment) Rules, 2001 - Rules 2 and 57AA; Cenvat Credit (Amendment) Rules, 2002 - Rule 2; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A, 57A(4), 57B, 57B(1), 57AA, 57AB, 57AC, 57G, 57J, 57Q, 57Q(1), 57R, 57S, 57S(7), 57T and 57T(5); Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 - Rule 12; Central Excise (Amendment) Rules, 2001 - Rule 4(3); Central Excise (Amendment) Rules,

Reported in : 2005(102)ECC121; 2005(187)ELT145(SC); JT2005(7)SC637; (2005)7SCC74

Modvat scheme.3. The assessees are engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under chapter 25 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They use explosives, welding electrodes, lubricating oil and crusher for extraction of limestone and crushing in the mines