Advanced Search Results

R.K. Refineries and Metal (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. General Manager, India ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2(1), 3, 11B, 11B(2) and 35; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 56A, 57 and 57A

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN18

a declaration that C.N. Dross comes under sub-heading No. 2620.00 of Chapter 26 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and it comes within the purview of exemption of Central Excise Duty in terms of Notification No. 19/88/CE

M/S Jyoti Carpet Indus Vs. Cce, Jaipur I

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2001)(132)ELT458TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Vicco Laboratories, Properietor Vicco Products Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 1991; New Tariff Act, 1985; Drugs Act; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(1)MhLj738

no good reason to change the classification merely on the ground of coming into force of the new Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 without establishing that the product has in fact changed its character.23. In Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta v. … In terms of the New Tariff Act, the product was sought to be classified by the petitioner under Chapter 30 subheading 3003.30 and the same was approved by A.C., Nagpur, by its order dated 6th October, 1986.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kitply Industries Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC851

classifiable under chapter heading 44.08. For this purpose they relied on Note 5 of Chapter 44 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 which read as under :- "For the purpose of heading No. 44.08 the expression "similar laminated wood" includes

Rosemount (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(99)ELT502Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Hair Oil' which was classified by them under Tariff Item No.3003 9014 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. However, as per Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, preparations for use on the hair … based on the composition of the items in B.P.L. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. CCE [1995 Supp (3) SCC1: (1995) 77 ELT485.8. As far as the first three items listed earlier are concerned, this Court has in CCE v.

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in “small containers” by the respondent(s)­assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … dismissed." After the judgment of the Supreme Court, the Circular dated 03.06.2009 77 was withdrawn by another Circular No.103/01/2015-CX-3 dated 12.10.2015. Now, the issue of

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

in “small containers” by the respondent(s)­assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … dismissed." After the judgment of the Supreme Court, the Circular dated 03.06.2009 77 was withdrawn by another Circular No.103/01/2015-CX-3 dated 12.10.2015. Now, the issue of

Arphi Electronics (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(100)ELT365TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Hindalco Industries Limited Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1996)(86)ELT571TriDel

in the manufacture of Aluminium and products thereof falling under Chapter 76 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the course of manufacture of these products, aluminium dross, pot dug out material and furnace dug out