Advanced Search Results

impact Containers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex., Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1996(85)ELT213(Bom)

no dispute before us that all inputs and final products fall under Chapter 76 or 83 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are clearly eligible inputs and final products under Rule 57A read with Notification No. 177/86 issued on

Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur Vs. Mahavir Aluminium Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B

Reported in : 2007(212)ELT3(SC); JT2007(7)SC72; 2007(7)SCALE81; (2007)5SCC260; [2007]11STJ71(SC); [2007]9STT61

to as 'the Assessee') was engaged in the manufacture of Aluminium Products falling under Chapter 76 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The assessee was manufacturing Aluminium Billets and was consuming it captively for the manufacture of Aluminium Irrigation Pipes

Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad-ii Vs. Aldec Corporation and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 35L; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 174; ;Excise Law

Reported in : AIR2005SC3621; 2005(102)ECC469; 2005(188)ELT241(SC); JT2005(8)SC574; (2005)7SCC700

prior to 28.2.1986) on one hand and tariff item 76.06 as well as chapter sub-heading 7616.90 under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 on the other hand and, therefore, the decision taken by the department in 1986 was irreversible. In the

Core Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 132; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 12(1), 57A, 57C, 57I, 57Q and 57U

Reported in : 2006(198)ELT21(Guj)

'Core IV after the Generic name and they classified the products under Chapter Sub-heading No. 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, to facilitate encashment of the accumulated Modvat credit by way of Export of the said product under claim

M/S. Steel Authority of India Ltd. (Unit Bhilai Steel Plant) Ispat Bha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

duty in his warehouse; (b) the Chapter, Heading No.and Sub-Heading No., if any, of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) under which each such goods fall; (c) the rate of duty leviable on each such … list to the assessee who shall, unless otherwise directed by the proper officer, determine the duty payable on 76 the goods intended to be removed in accordance with such list. (2-A) All clearances shall, subject to the

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Contr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A and 57Q

Reported in : 2008(125)ECC203; 2008(151)LC203(Madras)

Aluminium Company Ltd., is manufacturer of Aluminium and articles thereof falling under Chapter Heading No. 76 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It availed the credit of duty on 40 items to the tune of Rs. 77,21,450.41 declaring the same

Hindustan Packaging Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1995)LC245Tri(Delhi)

of NDDB the Tribunal had not considered the effect of definition of Toil' given in Note 1(viii) to Chapter 76 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The point of difference between the two Members was referred by … for consideration was whether 'Aluminium Foil backed by paper and polyethylene' was classifiable under Sub-heading 7606.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or as "Laminated paper" falling under Sub-heading 4811.29 of the Central Excise Tariff. The matter was originally heard

M/S. Airgrill Industries and M/S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(76)ECC790

Matched in: Citation (2001)(76)ECC790

Hindalco Industries Limited Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(0)ELT0TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Modern Malleable Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)(125)ECC274

and steel. Similarly if the component is made of aluminium (non-ferrous) it was sought to be classified under Chapter 76 of the Central Excise Tariff, but not as component of parts of H.T. Electric Transmission Lines which were … per constituent material and the nature of products manufactured in terms of Notes in Section XV, XVI of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.1.3 While seeking reason on the above proposition, Department made known the Appellant that it declared in the Form-I