Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 75 · Page 1 of about 428 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 17 1993

T.T.K. Pharma Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-17-1993

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1994)LC188Tri(Delhi)

:- 16. The claim of the appellants that their product Bronidiol is a fungicide classifiable under sub-heading 3801.20 Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 is not borne out by the way they themselves marketed the product because it is seen from the … consideration in this appeal is the correct classification of product 'Bronidiol'. The appellants had claimed the classification under chapter sub-heading 3801.20 of CET 1986 in their classification list No. 1/86 dated 6-3-1986 claiming the said product as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1990

Punjab Micro Nutrients Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-1990

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1990)(30)LC134Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2005

Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad-ii Vs. Aldec Corporation and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 35L; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 174; ;Excise Law

Reported in : AIR2005SC3621; 2005(102)ECC469; 2005(188)ELT241(SC); JT2005(8)SC574; (2005)7SCC700

prior to 28.2.1986) on one hand and tariff item 76.06 as well as chapter sub-heading 7616.90 under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 on the other hand and, therefore, the decision taken by the department in 1986 was irreversible. In the … had failed to lead evidence as to whether the silver chloride which was sold in the market having 75% silver content and the silver chloride which emerged as a by-product in filtering sulphate from mixture of zinc

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 19 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-i Vs. Chennai Petroleum Corpn. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(117)ECC322; 2007LC322(SC); JT2007(5)SC614; 2007(5)SCALE851; [2007]8STT168; 2007(1)LC613(SC)

naptha from crude oil since 1969. These petroleum products fall under Chapters 27, 28 and 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Basically, the assessee is a refinery. It uses Refinery Fuel Oil (RFO), being the residuary left after distillation … 1944.2. The assessee manufactures petroleum products like naptha from crude oil since 1969. These petroleum products fall under Chapters 27, 28 and 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Basically, the assessee is a refinery. It … to the benefit in terms of entry 34 of exemption Notification No. 75/84 read with the clarificatory circular clearly spells out that the assessee would

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2000

Graphic Charts Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-2000

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(94)LC762Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1998

Malt Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-1998

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(79)LC425Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1996

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(88)ELT465TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1995

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT565TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2004

Damnet Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., N.J. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-22-2004

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2005)(182)ELT225Tri(Mum.)bai

preparation made by blending or compounding of mineral on falling under chapter 27 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 which are the oils and of any other substance and is intended for industrial use (other than for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1995

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Aug-04-1995

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1996)(82)ELT212Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial