Advanced Search Results

Core Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 132; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 12(1), 57A, 57C, 57I, 57Q and 57U

Reported in : 2006(198)ELT21(Guj)

'Core IV after the Generic name and they classified the products under Chapter Sub-heading No. 3003.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, to facilitate encashment of the accumulated Modvat credit by way of Export of the said product under claim

Kamal JaIn Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 - Sections 74; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 301

follows : '(viii) sugar covered under sub-heading Nos. 1701.20, 1701.31, 1701.39 and 1702.11 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986).'3. Mr. Bhati further inviting to the definition submitted that Clause 24, chapter 17 of the … contention of the petitioner is that prior to repeal of the Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947 by Section 74 of the Act, 1993, 'sugar candy' was exempted from tax being 'sugar' vide item/serial No. 46 of the

Ricoh India Limited Vs. Commissioner

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

as covered under the headings, or sub-headings mentioned in column (3), as the case may be, of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986).” SI no.DescriptionCentral Excise Tariff Heading(1) (2)(3)1.x x x x x x xx x x x … relevant amendment during the relevant period. In order to appreciate the controversy, the relevant changes, Section notes and Chapter notes are noticed and reproduced below:- Prior to 1st January, 2007 “8471 Automatic data processing machines and units … parts and components along with manufacturing cost allocated to printing, as does 74% of the Xerox XD155df model. This clearly shows that the printing function

R.K. Refineries and Metal (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. General Manager, India ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2(1), 3, 11B, 11B(2) and 35; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 56A, 57 and 57A

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN18

Dross was shown @ 15% ad valorem. The 'copper waste and scrap' is classified under sub-heading 7404.00 of Chapter 74 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 attracting Central Excise Duty @ 15% ad valorem. … a declaration that C.N. Dross comes under sub-heading No. 2620.00 of Chapter 26 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and it comes within the purview of exemption of Central Excise Duty in terms of Notification No. 19/88/CE

Hindalco Industries Limited Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1996)(86)ELT571TriDel

in the manufacture of Aluminium and products thereof falling under Chapter 76 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the course of manufacture of these products, aluminium dross, pot dug out material and furnace dug out

Indian Tea Packeting Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC180

land into, any part of India as, and at the rates, set forth in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 provided that the duties of excise which shall be levied and collected on any excisable goods which are … scrap is a master alloy and also indicated that insofar as the terms of Heading No. 74.01/02 in Chapter 74 of Section 2 are concerned, the primary conclusion is that brass scrap is not a master alloy. It

Bama Metal Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1996)(82)ELT81TriDel

the appellants had used zinc as one of the inputs which do not fall within Chapter 74 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellants had urged before the Collector that the Notification in question nowhere impliedly suggested that in order

Super Engineering Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1996)(82)ELT539TriDel

26A of Central Excise Tariff as it existed prior to 28-2-1986, or thereafter under Chapter 74 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, as the case may be.2.1 The importers/traders of 'brass dross/ash' either sold the said material as such, or

Finolex Cables Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1998)(100)ELT517Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Metal Lamp Caps (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1995)(75)ELT177TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi