Advanced Search Results

Frontier Springs Limited Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. (Appeals)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11A(1) and 35F; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 52A, 57F(1) and 57G

Reported in : 2000(67)ECC353; 2000(118)ELT567(All)

he is engaged in the manufacturer of leaf springs & coil springs falling under Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The petitioner was using Flat bars as inputs in the manufacture of his final products and was availing

G.S. Auto International Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Chand ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 15 and 17

Reported in : AIR2003SC986; 2003(85)ECC696; 2003(152)ELT3(SC); JT2003(1)SC428; 2003(1)SCALE340; (2003)2SCC371; [2003]1SCR372

Appeal No. 5711 of 1999], having regard to the change of scheme of classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 held, for the Assessment Year 1986-87, that the said goods were classifiable under Chapter Heading 87.07 and not … Assessment Year 1986-87, that the said goods were classifiable under Chapter Heading 87.07 and not under Chapter Heading 73.18, as contended by the Revenue.8. Mr. S. Ganesh, learned senior counsel appearing for the assessee, contends that inasmuch

Calcutta Steel Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)(54)ELT90TriDel

others, viz. Hoops, Strips, Flats and Bars were incorporated.For the period from 01-08-1983 to 27-02-1986, under the revised Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Chapter 72 was introduced, and the definitions were incorporated verbatim as Chapter notes.From 01-03-1988, Chapter 72 was further revised … (30) E.L.T. 527 had held the product as a 'Bar'.With effect from 28-02-1986, the Chapter heading 72 and 73 covered Iron and Steel products and statutory definitions already in existence during the period when Tariff Item-25 was

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Tokushu Menon Paper Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1998)(102)ELT481Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Sutham Nylocots Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(87)ECC403

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Thungabhadra Steel Products Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 1997(58)ECC26; 1998(98)ELT334(Kar); ILR1997KAR1301; 1997(3)KarLJ601

there was an amendment to the definition of goods by Act 5/1986 where the words 'Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' have been introduced. We are giving below the old Section 2 as well as new Section : - … the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Now, after amendment, the provision that has been made applicable is Chapter 7308.90. Tariff Item No. 69 of Schedule-I reads as 'all other goods, not elsewhere specified', while under Chapter … Now, after amendment, the provision that has been made applicable is Chapter 7308.90. Tariff Item No. 69 of Schedule-I reads as 'all other goods, not

M/S Sto-racks Ltd Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(74)ECC721

the mobile storage system had components would merit classification under chapter sub heading 9403.00 to the schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The reasons given there-in will hold good in respect of this appeal as well. As per the brochure, … note 1 (k). Therefore articles of furniture falling under chapter 94 are excluded from section XV and hence chapter 73 as well. I have earlier mentioned that the mobile storage systems fall in the category of furniture by

Laxmi Rolling Mills Vs. C.E.G.A.T., New Delhi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35K; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(80)ECC84; 2002(142)ELT327(All)

of 1992-C.E., dated 1-3-92 as they were using unserviceable rails, fishplates etc. classifiable under Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 purchased in auction directly from the railways and consequently the duty paid nature of the said goods cannot

Jaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(83)ELT49TriDel

is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles

South India Structural Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3 and 11A; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Constitution of India; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9 and 49

Reported in : 1998(102)ELT13(Mad)

taking a stand that the work carried out by the petitioners were appropriately covered under Heading 7308 of Chapter 73 of the Tariff Act. The Superintendent of Central Excise had also clarified that the structurals were not goods … of excise under the provisions of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 read with Heading 7308.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, in respect of structural fabrication work carried out by the petitioner for Chettinad Cement Corporation Limited under Order