Advanced Search Results

Ms. Orange City Alloys Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapter 72; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 11A(1); Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rule 25

of excisable goods namely, "iron and steel ingots" ('final products' for short) falling under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The said final product is manufactured in an electrical induction furnace by utilising the inputs such as electricity

Upper India Steel Mfg. and Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises Act, 1944; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A to 57J and 173G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1990(27)ECC228; 1990(49)ELT22(P& H)

well as that of the final products which qualified for MOD VAT Credit Scheme. Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 deals with iron and steel. Heading 73.02, in particular, deals with 'waste and scrap of iron and steel'.

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Jindal Vijayanagar Stee ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(43), 2(44), 27, 59, 61 and 61(1); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(123)ECC355; 2007(149)LC355(Karnataka); 2008(222)ELT35(Kar)

Act 1962. The respondent M/s Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd., Bellary is manufacturing steel falling under Chapter 72 of Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. Certain goods were imported and enter the territory of India at Chennai Port. Under the supervision of the

Jaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(83)ELT49TriDel

is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles

Apex Steels (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1995)(80)ELT368TriDel

Excise Rules, 1944. The Department has stated that the said goods are classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 7214.90 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; which reads as follows :"72.14. Other bars and rods of iron or non-alloy steel, not further worked than

Cce Vs. Bansal High Carbon P. Ltd. and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC507

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-i Vs. Champdany Indust ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 2A and 14A; Sales Tax Acts; Interpretative Rules - Rules 1 and 3

Reported in : 2009(169)LC51(SC); 2009(241)ELT481(SC); JT2009(12)SC156; 2009(12)SCALE317; (2009)9SCC466:2009AIRSCW6039

entirely of polypropylene and therefore, as per Note 1 of Chapter 57 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 those carpets cannot be classified as jute carpets but are classifiable as polypropylene carpets. The said notice related

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Fykays Engg. P. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(69)ECC495

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378

India Ltd., Faridabad, (M/s. FIL) manufactures air-conditioning and refrigerating machinery and appliances classifiable under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. Assessee cleared compressors falling under tariff sub-heading 8414.10. They also cleared to its buyers separately 'fly wheel' under

Saraswati Steel Industries and 20 Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC344

rods of iron and nonalloy steel, round bars, CTD bars etc. The goods being manufactured by them the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and previously in the erstwhile Tariff were classifiable under TI 25 of the First Schedule to the Old … under various sub-items of items 25 of the CET before 1.3.1986 and goods falling under various sub-heading of Chapter 72 after 1.3.1986. He also pointed out to the observations of the Tribunal in the said paragraph about the