Advanced Search Results
Zenith Control and Systems (P) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-05-1999
Excise
(1999)(63)ECC861
dated 6.6.89 that the above said items are parts of computers falling under chapter heading 84.73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It was alleged that from the classification list filed, these parts falling under heading 84.73 had not been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNova Steels (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-11-1996
Excise
(1997)LC313Tri(Delhi)
in Column (3) and falling within Chapters 72 or 73 or Heading 84.54 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereafter. First proviso to the Notification states that such … of final products. The notification exempted final products of the description specified in Column (3) and falling within Chapters 72 or 73 or Heading 84.54 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 from the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitc Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-16-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)(77)LC411Tri(Chennai)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
V. Ananthraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Sep-16-2002
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173Q and 209A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A
2003(1)BomCR675; (2002)4BOMLR871; 2002LC572(Bombay); 2003(151)ELT278(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj721
under Section 3 of the Act became payable at the rates set forth in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('CET' for short). By a letter dated 22nd July, 1986 the Petitioners filed revised classification list seeking approval … to the PLC's in the year 1987-88 budget, the company filed revised classification list classifying the goods under Chapter Heading No. 84.71 which was also approved by the Excise authorities on 1st May, 1987. It is the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadura Coats Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madurai
Chennai
Feb-08-1995
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11A(1), 35 and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
1995(51)ECC55; 1995(79)ELT567(Mad)
of high tenacity yarn of polyamides or polyester. In Heading No. 59.02 in Chapter 59. Section XI of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, refer to the processed fabric. Section XI of the Act is titled Textiles and Textile Articles. The chapter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ltu, Delhi vs.nangalama ...
Delhi
Oct-31-2019
Service Tax
goods” thus: „excisable goods‟ means goods specified in the 1st “(d) Schedule and the 2nd Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) as being subject to a duty of excise and includes salt; Explanation. - For the … in terms of the provisions of the Central Excise Rules, 2002; or (vi) gold or silver falling within Chapter 71 of the said First Schedule, arising in the course of manufacture of copper or zinc by smelting; or.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUni Products (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-11-2000
MRTP
(2000)(119)ELT325TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUni Products (i) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-11-2000
MRTP
(2000)(92)LC103Tri(Delhi)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-12-1996
Land Acquisition
(1996)(88)ELT465TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Syed Zakishrati, Md and M/S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-31-2001
MRTP
(2001)(76)ECC708
rosin. According to the respondents, liquid gold falls under Chapter 32 (sub-heading 32.07) of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short "Tariff Act") which according to the appellants is not correct because as per the HSN Explanatory … 32 (SH 32.07) of the Tariff Act.The appellants claim has been that the liquid gold could fall under Chapter 71. As per them the Central Government has classified "liquid gold" under Chapter 71 under Notification No. 117/94-Cus dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »