Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 70 · Page 1 of about 347 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 10 1995

Chandra Lakshmi Laminated Safety Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-1995

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1995)LC75Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2007

Kemrock Industries and Exports Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-29-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC363; 2007LC363(SC); 2007(210)ELT497(SC); 2007(5)SCALE168; 2007AIRSCW7308

Fibre Reinforced Plastics. They seek classification of the said item under Heading 70.14 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. According to the Revenue, the said item is classifiable under Heading 39.20 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. … with other materials stand covered as plastics and articles thereof. On the other hand, Heading 70.14 falls under Chapter 70, which refers to 'glass and glassware'. It is not in dispute that the item in question is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2008

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Ishaan Research Lab (P) Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 4(4), 11A and 11A(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3 and 4; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9(2), 173Q and 209A

Reported in : 2008(230)ELT7(SC); JT2008(10)SC1; 2008(12)SCALE270; 2008AIRSCW6235; 2008(6)Supreme558

or mis-statement. Charge of suppression is not sustainable. Proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Act is not applicable. CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT, 1985. Chapter 33, Heading 33-04, sub-heading 3304 & Heading 33.05; Chapter 30, Heading 33.03; Sub-heading 3003.19 : Medicament or cosmetic … 20, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 42, 45 and 46, The remaining 70 products were held to be the 'cosmetic' and 'toilet preparations' falling under Chapter 33 of the Scheduled under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 30 1999

Hindustan Newsprint Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-1999

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(162)ELT1125TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1988

Amit Polymers and Composites Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-30-1988

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1989)(19)ECC270

board for the purpose of central excise duty. The appellants claimed classification under Head- ing 4818.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as other articles of paper pulp, paper or paper board.The Assistant Collector classified it under Heading 392031 as … under Heading 4818.90 of C.E.T. Act. He has ruled out clas- sification under Heading 392031 in view of Chapter Note 1 of Chapter 39 of C.E.T A. as, for the purpose of classification under Heading 39.20, the … core and resin acts as binding agent. Admittedly, paper constitutes 60 to 70% of the finished product by weight as well as thickness and balance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1990

Wood Polymers Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-06-1990

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)(47)ELT595TriDel

impregnated with a chemical solution which the department has classified as resin solution (phenol-formaldehyde solution) and classified under Chapter 39 of the Schedule, herein-after referred to as the said schedule, to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985Central Excise dated 31-7-1989, classifying the products of the appellant under heading 3920.21 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.4. The process of manufacture in the case of paper based decorative laminated sheets/boards is as under :- Several … about 30 per cent is represented by resin and the remaining about 70 per cent is by paper by weight as well as by thickness.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1994

Collector of Central Excise Vs. D.K. Electricals Industries

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-1994

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1994)(74)ELT272TriDel

Department, they paid duty on such PVC coated G.I. wires under sub-heading 8544.00 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 under protest and also filed a representation dated 11-12-1990 in which they insisted that the activity of coating … the Collector (Appeals) Indore. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of Electrical Wires and Cables falling under Chapter 85 of the Central Excise Tariff. They also undertake job-work of coating telecommunication G.I. Wires with PVC. On

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1998

Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and ors.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-1998

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(63)ECC709

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1991

Texmaco Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-02-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 9, 49, 56A, 57A and 173Q; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 11A

Reported in : 1992(59)ELT522(Cal)

Excise duty on the manufacture of wagons is leviable under sub-heading No. 8606.00 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the material provisions of which are as under:Heading Sub-heading Description of goods. Rate ofNo. No. duty1 2 3 … 35,36, 37, 38,32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 39, 40, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 78,79, 80, 81, 82,40, 48,70, 72, 73, … inputs Description of final productsNo.1. 2 31. Goods classifiable under any Goods classifiable under any headings headings of Chapters 28, 29, 30, of Chapters 28, 29, 30, 32, 33,34, 35,36, 37, 38,32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1995

Jaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(83)ELT49TriDel

is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial