Advanced Search Results
Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi Vs. Hindustan Sanitaryware and ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-10-2002
Excise
Central Excise Traiff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1)
AIR2002SC3162; 2002LC569(SC); 2002(145)ELT3(SC); JT2002(7)SC17; 2002(6)SCALE380; (2002)7SCC515; [2002]SUPP2SCR224
appearing for the Revenue, contends that as the moulds of plaster of paris are goods classified under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 they cannot be treated as inputs; they must be treated as the final product and as they are … (2) under Chapter 25, would be 'plaster of paris' and the final product given in column (3) under Chapter 69 would be 'ceramic goods'.8. The proviso postulates a situation where the final product itself is exempted in which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-21-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(83)ELT49TriDel
is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles … and the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Aravali Forgings Ltd. reported in 1994 (70) E.L.T. 693 and again another decision of the Tribunal in the case of Echjay Industries Ltd. reported in 1994 (72)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMak Controls Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-16-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(61)ECC296
Central Government exempted parts of aeroplanes and helicopters falling under sub-heading No. 88.03 of the Schedule to this Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 from the whole of duty of excise leviable thereon which is specified in the Schedule. Therefore, in order … Central Excise Tariff and referred us to note-3 which is reproduced below for convenience of reference:-- References in Chapters 86 to 88 to 'parts' or 'accessories' do not apply to parts or accessories which are not suitable … is whether the appellants are entitled for the benefit of notification No. 69/93-CE dt. 28.2.93.According to the above said notification, the Central Government exempted parts
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-21-2007
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378
India Ltd., Faridabad, (M/s. FIL) manufactures air-conditioning and refrigerating machinery and appliances classifiable under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. Assessee cleared compressors falling under tariff sub-heading 8414.10. They also cleared to its buyers separately 'fly wheel' under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVst Tillers and Tractors Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
May-09-2005
Service Tax
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Modi Cements Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Apr-28-2000
Service Tax
(2000)(71)ECC260
Act, 1944.M/s. Modi Cement Ltd., Raipur are engaged in the manufacture of cement under Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. During the period October 1987 to October 1990, they had received HDPE woven sacks/bags for packing cement. The … duty was taken by the appellants at a much later date, after a lapse of between 33 and 69 months from the date of receipt of goods. The Asst. Collector had denied them the credit on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitc Bhadrachalam Paper Boards Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-28-2003
Service Tax
(2003)(88)ECC37
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central, Exices and Customs. Vs. M/S. Shital Internati ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-22-2010
Service Tax
the goods manufactured by the assessee were "unprocessed knitted pile fabrics" classifiable under chapter sub-heading 6001.12 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (for short "the Tariff Act"), attracting Nil rate of duty.2. Since the question of law arising for our … mention that in C.A. No. 4541 of 2005 relating to the same assessee, the Commissioner, vide Order-in-Original No. 69/CE/JAL/03 dated 30th July 2003, who had adjudicated on the show cause notice dated 22nd June 1) (1989) 2
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-17-1998
MRTP
(1998)(76)LC77Tri(Mum.)bai
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of C. Ex. Vs. United Phosphorous Limited
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-19-1996
MRTP
(1996)(86)ELT676TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »