Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 67 · Page 1 of about 252 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 29 2002

Ramoji Rao Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT494Tri(Bang.)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1992

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Reckitt and Colman of India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-21-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1992)(42)LC38Tri(Delhi)

list the respondents had declared, among others, the following products under sub-heading numbers of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985:________________________________________________________________Sl. No. Product Sub heading No.1. Purity India Barely 1101.90 400 gm/100 gm/50 gm Tins2. Robinson's Patent Barely 1101.90 … Insulin, wheat gluten" which is akin to chapter 11 dealing with the above goods only under the CET Act 1985. Chapter sub-heading No. 11.01 of the Explanatory Notes covers products of milling industry including flours among others, of cereals.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2004

Hello Minerals Water (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11BB

Reported in : 2004(174)ELT422(All)

Water classifiable under Chapter sub-heading No. 2201.19 (previously under Chapter sub-heading No. 2201.90) of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Its Unit No. 1 is located at D-18, Sector 3, Noida. The petitioner is also engaged in the … Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (Annexure 1 to the writ petition) and for declaring that the benefit of Notifications 67/95 and 214/86 would be available to the petitioner.2. In this case on 6-5-2004 the respondents were granted one

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1995

Jaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(83)ELT49TriDel

is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles … present case with reference to the material available on record, we find that in the classification list No. 67/88, the goods have been described as (i) semi-finished products of iron or steel - forgings and forged products

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2006

Hindustan Newsprint Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Jun-22-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(113)ECC504

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in “small containers” by the respondent(s)­assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Versus M/S MADHAN AGRO INDUSTRIES (I) PVT. LTD. ...Respondent CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6703-6710 OF2009WITH COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PONDICHERRY …Appellant Versus M/S AISHWARYA INDUSTRIES AND

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2018

Subject : Excise

in “small containers” by the respondent(s)­assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28­ 02­2005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … Versus M/S MADHAN AGRO INDUSTRIES (I) PVT. LTD. ...Respondent CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6703-6710 OF2009WITH COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PONDICHERRY …Appellant Versus M/S AISHWARYA INDUSTRIES AND

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2005

Madras Refineries Ltd., Chennai Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jan-07-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(100)ECC317

of the following description, namely, benzene, toluene and xylene, falling within Chapter 29 in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986). 2. This Notification shall come into force on the 28th day of February, 1986." It … raw naphtha which was cleared without payment of duty by CPCL during 1/1998-7/99 in terms of Notification No. 67/95-CE dated 16.3.1995 (as amended). The order impugned in Appeal No. E/1234/2001 sustained a demand of duty on Fuel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2003

United Metal Printers Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-28-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC686

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1989

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Wander India Limited

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-1989

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)(25)ECC315

of Notification No. 116/69-CE dated 3.5.69, as amended and determination whether the product "Iso Benzacyl Forte" falling under Central Excise Tariff Item 14-E, manufactured by M/s. Wander India Limited and by M/s. Aphali Pharmaceutical Limited on behalf of M/s. … confirmed the demands under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act. Aggrieved with the above order of the Assistant Collector, M/s. Wander India … filed before the collector (Appeals) in respect of these products in January, 1985. The Collector (Appeals)passed two orders dated 26.8.85 and 9.9.1985 holding that the … In support of this proposition, Shri Sunder Rajan has advanced the following arguments:-- (i) The opening paragraph of Chapter-67 of Remigton's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15th Edition, 1975, describes what is understood by the term "Pharmaceutical necessities". The opening

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial