Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

nor the use of said goods in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and Chapter heading under the Central Excise tariff was called for from the appellant. The same was, thereafter, furnished by … case was engaged in manufacturing of excisable goods which fell under Chapters 28, 29 and 31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act,1985. The appellant had installed storage tanks for storing ammonia at its premises situated at JNPT and had claimed … Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003)(ix)(ix) the service tax leviable under section 66 of the Finance Act; …….” 20. In respect of a service taxable

Smt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ExciseCriminal

Reported in : 2008(227)ELT61(All)

M/s Shahnaz Ayhurvedics (accused No. 1) were infact cosmetics and toilet preparations falling under Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 attracting higher rate of Central Excise Duties while the same were misdeclared as Ayurvedic Medicine' and cleared under … in this case that the ratio of Shree Baidyanath (supra) has no bearing in a case like instant. 66. From the aforesaid settled legal proposition, it becomes evident that while deciding the case like instant, the statutory

Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944

Reported in : (2007)7VST197(MP)

Matched in: Advocate Kunal Thakre and ;Akshat Sharma, Advs.;H.S. Shrivastava, Sr. Counsel, ;Girish Shrivastava and ;Vijay Raghav Singh, Advs. Dharmendra Sharma, Addl. Solicitor General and ;O.P. Namdeo, GA for UOI, Commissioner, Central Excise and ;Sanjay Yadav, Dy. AG

Collector of Central Excise, Shillong Vs. Wood Craft Products Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1995(50)ECC122; 1995LC417(SC); 1995(77)ELT23(SC); JT1995(3)SC207; 1995(2)SCALE364; (1995)3SCC454; [1995]2SCR797

ISI Glossary of Terms, while according to the revenue the structure of the central excise tariff in the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is the adoption of a detailed central excise tariff based broadly on the system of classification derived from … and from 1.3.1992 onwards. The division into three periods is on account of the fact that an amended Chapter Note 5 in Chapter 44 was introduced w.e.f. 19.3.1990 on account of the controversy which had been raised

Enercon (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Subject : Land Acquisition

be, and falling within the Chapter, heading or sub-heading or tariff item of the first Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) (hereinafter referred to as the Central Excise Tariff Act), as are given in the corresponding

The India Cements Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

dated 31.08.1996 is not retrospective?.".2. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under Chapter 25 of Central Excise Tariff Act, (CETA) 1985. Admittedly, the assessee availed the benefit of modvat credit provided … rule 57Q- (i) in sub rule (1), - (a)... (b)... (d)following goods falling within the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) and used in the factory of the manufacturer- (i) all goods falling under heading Nos.84.02,

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(88)ELT465TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Duratex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(139)ELT88TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Maa Sharda Wine Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Reported in : AIR2009MP207; 2009(3)MPHT304; 2009[15]STR3; [2009]22STT105; (2009)22VST170(MP); 2009(5)AIRKarR498

Excise Act 'excisable goods' means those goods specified in the First Schedule and the Second Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) as being subject to a duty of excise and includes salt. The Chapter 22 of … excise revenue for the State and it was within the competence of the State entry under the entry 66 of the List II and 8 of the List II of the Schedule of the Constitution. We are

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Reported in : 2002(83)ECC85; 1997(89)ELT247(SC); JT1996(11)SC283; 1996(9)SCALE457; (1997)5SCC536; [1996]Supp10SCR585; [1998]111STC467(SC)

- by mis-interpreting or mis- applying the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 read with Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or Customs Act, 1962 read with Customs Tariff Act or by mis-interpreting or mis-applying any of the rules, … the same date and by the same Amendment Act (Act 25 of 1978), provides for refund of duties. Chapter-III deals with powers and duties of officers and land holders while Chapter-IV deals with transport by sea. Chapter-V … such deduction.72. As substituted in 1963, and as it stands today, Section 66-A reads thus:64-A. In contracts of sale, amount of increased or decreased taxes