Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-21-2007
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378
India Ltd., Faridabad, (M/s. FIL) manufactures air-conditioning and refrigerating machinery and appliances classifiable under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. Assessee cleared compressors falling under tariff sub-heading 8414.10. They also cleared to its buyers separately 'fly wheel' under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and ors.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-13-1998
Service Tax
(1999)(63)ECC709
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in “small containers” by the respondent(s)assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … technical term or a term of science or art, be presumed to 65 have used an ordinary term as coal according to the meaning ascribed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in “small containers” by the respondent(s)assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … technical term or a term of science or art, be presumed to 65 have used an ordinary term as coal according to the meaning ascribed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBakelite Hylam Ltd. Rep. by Manager-taxation Vs. the Customs, Excise a ...
Chennai
Dec-23-2008
Excise
Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 11, 11A, 11A(1), 11AC and 35B; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2), 173Q and 226; Finance Act, 2000 ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 226 and 226(2)
2008(161)LC183(Madras)
Excise Act, 1944, is the charging Section in terms of which duties specified, under the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, is levied on various excisable goods manufactured in India at the rates set forth in the Schedule to … full description of the excisable goods produced or manufactured or to be produced or manufactured by them, the chapter heading and the sub-heading of the Tariff Act under which such goods would fall, the rate of duty
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Star Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs(Imports) Raigad
Supreme Court of India
Oct-07-2015
Land Acquisition
to point out the tariff entries and all relevant provisions of the exemption notification. Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 deals with 'Ores, Slag and Ash Notes'. Tariff Item 2601 thereof gives the description of goods falling in … added products and the Molybdenum content in the roasted molybdenum ore is in the range of 56% to 65%. He further stated that they have declared the goods as Roasted Molybdenum Ore as per the description given
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamakrishna Engg. Works Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-08-1996
Service Tax
(1996)(83)ELT346TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-29-2006
Service Tax
Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944
(2007)7VST197(MP)
Matched in: Advocate Kunal Thakre and ;Akshat Sharma, Advs.;H.S. Shrivastava, Sr. Counsel, ;Girish Shrivastava and ;Vijay Raghav Singh, Advs. Dharmendra Sharma, Addl. Solicitor General and ;O.P. Namdeo, GA for UOI, Commissioner, Central Excise and ;Sanjay Yadav, Dy. AG
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamoji Rao Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Nov-29-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)(161)ELT494Tri(Bang.)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Pithampur Alloys Casting Ltd
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-15-2012
Land Acquisition
and cast article of iron and steel falling under Chapter 72 and 73 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Their factory was visited by the Preventive Central Excise officers on 25.7.96. Various checks and verifications were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »