Advanced Search Results
Dinesh Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Servic ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-28-2019
MRTP
The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff Act’, for short) manufactured through job workers.3. On 25.03.2003 Rule 12B was inserted in Central Excise … or fabrics falling under Chapter 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 58 or 60, readymade garments falling under Chapter 61 or 62 or made up textile articles falling under Chapter 63 of First Schedule to the Tariff Act].
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadura Coats Private Limited Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Central ...
Chennai
Apr-24-2012
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Section 35F, 11BB, 87(c), Chapters 52, 54, 55, 59; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35C(2A); Constitution of India - Article 226, 32, 142; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 9-C, 9-A(1); Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 18 and 20
Spun Polyester) multiple folded yarn falling under Chapters 52, 54, 55, respectively of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It is also a Star Trading House and has paid crores in tax to the Government.(ii) There were … manufacture of cotton yarn, core spun yarn and 100% SSP (Staple Spun Polyester) multiple folded yarn falling under Chapters 52, 54, 55, respectively of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It is also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Jindal Vijayanagar Stee ...
Karnataka
Oct-24-2007
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(43), 2(44), 27, 59, 61 and 61(1); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
2007(123)ECC355; 2007(149)LC355(Karnataka); 2008(222)ELT35(Kar)
Act 1962. The respondent M/s Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd., Bellary is manufacturing steel falling under Chapter 72 of Central Excise Tariff Act 1985. Certain goods were imported and enter the territory of India at Chennai Port. Under the supervision of the … appeal is the actual date to be reckoned for the purpose of calculation of interest leviable under Section 61 of the Customs Act 1962. The respondent M/s Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd., Bellary is manufacturing steel falling under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Indian Sugar and General Industry Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and anr.
Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
May-06-1999
Miscellaneous
obtained by boiling the price of the Palmyra palm--Nil." 3. Thereafter, the Parliament introduced a separate enactment called Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 in the place of the Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. In the new enactment … Act, 1944. In the new enactment various kinds of sugar were incorporated under various headings and sub-headings in Chapter XVII. Consequently, Section 14(viii) of the Central Sales Tax Act was amended to be in tune with the … Mr. C. Natarajan, for the petitioner starts with a reference to [1986] 61 STC 190 (Ker) [State Trading Corporation of India Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangaba ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-11-1997
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A
1997(92)ELT23(SC); JT1997(10)SC737; (1997)9SCC681
the description specified in the Schedule hereto annexed and falling within Chapter 90 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon which is specified in the … 60/95, dated 16th March, 1995 came to be issued which has been extracted earlier and another Notification No. 61/95-C.E., dated 16-3-1995 was issued under Section 5A of the Act, exempting goods of the description specified in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Cen. Excise Vs. Nasa
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jan-17-2007
Excise
For the purpose of this notification, "rate of duty" shall mean the rate of duty leviable under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of (sic)) the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (58 of 1957) and … from outside the factory, and subjected to any process); (d) Article of apparel and clothing accessories falling under Chapter 61 Declared value multiplied by 12% of the rate of duty on such article of apparel and clothing accessories.]
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Trimurti Water Proof (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Feb-20-2001
Excise
(2001)(131)ELT584Tri(Kol.)kata
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Impex Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Apr-11-2007
Service Tax
(2007)(119)ECC73
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWavIn India Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Jul-01-1994
Customs
Customs Act,1962 - Sections 12, 14, 25 and 46; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8 And 192; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 8 And 8(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975
1994(73)ELT782(Mad)
3(1) of the Tariff Act. The contention before the Supreme Court was that the notifications of exemption from Central Excise duty issued from time to time, under Section 8(1) of the Act, would be applicable in the case … the materials that it has imported are chargeable to customs duty under Chapter 39.01/06 of the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act. According to … Court in its judgment, in the case of Khandelwal Metal and Engg. Works v. Union of India : 1985(20)ELT222(SC) . The Supreme Court has observed on this, as follows :'The question which we must first examine is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahnaz Ayurvedics and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-14-2003
Excise
(2003)(88)ECC615
the Appellants No. 1 & 2 are Ayurvedic Medicaments classifiable under Chapter 30 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act or under Chapter 33 as Cosmetics, whether M/s. Shaherb Cosmetics are the related persons for the purpose of … the "Festival of India" organized by the Government of India in France, U.K. and various other countries in 1985; that the Book was meant to be sold only abroad; that in any case, the settled position of … any thing. He referred to a Certificate of State Ayurvedic Hospital (Page 61 A-Vol 6) which certifies that Shahnaz Hussain's range of product clinically tested
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »