Advanced Search Results
D.P. Lon Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs
Supreme Court of India
Mar-13-2003
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 173, 173F, 173Q, 173Q(1) and 174
AIR2003SC1399; 2003(86)ECC521; 2003(153)ELT269(SC); JT2003(3)SC258; 2003(3)SCALE378; (2003)5SCC97; [2003]2SCR1125; [2003]132STC525(SC)
22.5.1986, the doubled and/or multifold yarns falling under Chapter 54 or Chapter 55 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 were wholly exempted from the duty of excise leviable thereon, provided such doubled or multifolded yarns were manufactured … E/2618/1990-D, whereby the Tribunal has held that 'Taspa' yarn manufactured by the appellant was covered under Heading No. 56.06 of the Central Excise Tariff and, therefore, confirmed the demand of duty of central excise of Rs. 5,63,066.40
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner Vs. Rama Shenoy
Kerala
Sep-10-2002
Sales Tax
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963
2003(1)KLT720; [2004]138STC323(Ker)
not 'sugar' but the 'sugar covered under sub-headings 1701-20, 1701-31, 1701-39 and 1702-11 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' and submitted that by virtue of the provisions of Chapter 17 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 … in this Tax Revision Case is as to whether 'sugar candy' sold by the assessee falls within Entry 56 of the Third Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') eligible
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.T.K. Pharma Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-17-1993
MRTP
(1994)LC188Tri(Delhi)
:- 16. The claim of the appellants that their product Bronidiol is a fungicide classifiable under sub-heading 3801.20 Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 is not borne out by the way they themselves marketed the product because it is seen from the … consideration in this appeal is the correct classification of product 'Bronidiol'. The appellants had claimed the classification under chapter sub-heading 3801.20 of CET 1986 in their classification list No. 1/86 dated 6-3-1986 claiming the said product as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...
Chennai
Jan-08-2008
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56A and 57G
2008(125)ECC123; 2008(151)LC123(Madras); 2008(227)ELT361(Mad)
the guise of parts of drip irrigation system. The pipes were classifiable under Chapter Heading 3917 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They are parts of general use and not meant for use solely and principally with Drip Irrigation System … System. Drip Irrigation System and parts fall under Heading 84.24 exempt from duty in terms of NOM No. 56/95 CE dated 16.3.1995. The Revenue's contention is that the said pipes manufactured were not exempt items. The Revenue
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in “small containers” by the respondent(s)assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … parlance test would 2 (1995) 3 SCC 454 3 (2008) 17 SCC 569 4 (2005) 2 SCC 460 18 be applicable in determining the classification
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in “small containers” by the respondent(s)assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … parlance test would 2 (1995) 3 SCC 454 3 (2008) 17 SCC 569 4 (2005) 2 SCC 460 18 be applicable in determining the classification
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Frick India Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-21-2007
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14A and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
2007(121)ECC377; 2007(147)LC377(SC); 2007(216)ELT497(SC); 2007(11)SCALE366; 2007AIRSCW6378
India Ltd., Faridabad, (M/s. FIL) manufactures air-conditioning and refrigerating machinery and appliances classifiable under Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.3. Assessee cleared compressors falling under tariff sub-heading 8414.10. They also cleared to its buyers separately 'fly wheel' under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGarden Silk Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-16-1995
Land Acquisition
(1995)(78)ELT580TriDel
was from 1-3-1986 to 31-5-1987.5. The ld. counsel submitted that from 1-3-1986, the new Central Excise Tariff under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 came into force; that under the belief that Taspa Texturised yarn which was classified under Tariff Item 18-n(i)(b) … after such inquiry as he deems fit with such modifications as are considered necessary.15. That HSN notes under Chapter 56.06 read : "These products are composed of a core usually of one or more textile yarns around which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVst Tillers and Tractors Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
May-09-2005
Service Tax
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Fenner (India) Ltd. Overruled
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-14-1989
Land Acquisition
(1989)(24)ECC115
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »