Advanced Search Results
The Commissioner of Central ] Excise and Custom, Daman, Vs. M/S. Gujch ...
Mumbai
Dec-16-2010
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 53, 223B, 9(2); Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 34,6
various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing modvat facility under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (herein after for … stated thus :The Respondents herein are engaged in manufacture of various products, which are, excisable goods failling under Chapters 22, 28, 29, 34, 38 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are also availing … accounted for in their statutory records should not be confiscated under Rules 53 and 223B of the said Rules 1994, as though the goods were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGraphic Charts Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Apr-18-2000
Land Acquisition
(2001)(94)LC762Tri(Mum.)bai
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Servic ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-28-2019
MRTP
The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff Act’, for short) manufactured through job workers.3. On 25.03.2003 Rule 12B was inserted in Central Excise … rejecting application seeking rectification of mistake.2. The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff Act’, for short) manufactured through job
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Noble Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay
Supreme Court of India
Mar-17-2005
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56, 56(2), 56(4), 173B(4) and 173Q(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A
AIR2005SC4053; 2005(2)CTC458; 2005(99)ECC353; 2005(182)ELT27(SC); JT2005(3)SC435; (2005)3SCC674
aforesaid products as acrylic polymers in primary form under Chapter Sub-heading 3906.90 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 claiming concessional rate of duty @ 40% ad valorem in terms of Sr. No. 42 of the schedule … duty @ 40% ad valorem in terms of Sr. No. 42 of the schedule to the notification No. 53/88 dated 01.03.1988. The appellants, vide their letter dated 11.10.1990, addressed to the Assistant Collector submitted that there was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Etc. Vs. m/s.aishwarya Industries Throu ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in “small containers” by the respondent(s)assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … is recycled and blended with 9 MT coconut oil in tanker for 53 two hours or 16 MT coconut oil tanker for three hours; (iii)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2018
Excise
in “small containers” by the respondent(s)assessee(s) is classifiable under Heading 1513 and not under Heading 3305 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the Revenue is in appeal before us. 2 2. The dispute is … Excise Tariff Act effective 28 022005 will require a specific notice and is therefore extracted below: BEFORE AMENDMENT CHAPTER 15 ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE FATS AND OILS AND THEIR CLEAVAGE PRODUCTS; PREPARED EDIBLE FATS; ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE WAXES … is recycled and blended with 9 MT coconut oil in tanker for 53 two hours or 16 MT coconut oil tanker for three hours; (iii)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsian Alloys Limited and Mr. Pawan Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-28-2006
Land Acquisition
(2006)(112)ECC383
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-i Vs. Champdany Indust ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-08-2009
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 2A and 14A; Sales Tax Acts; Interpretative Rules - Rules 1 and 3
2009(169)LC51(SC); 2009(241)ELT481(SC); JT2009(12)SC156; 2009(12)SCALE317; (2009)9SCC466:2009AIRSCW6039
blankets, jute felt, jute mats and mattings, jute carpets and bleached, dyed or printed jute fabrics falling under Chapter 53, 56, 57 or 63 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with the condition that … entirely of polypropylene and therefore, as per Note 1 of Chapter 57 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 those carpets cannot be classified as jute carpets but are classifiable as polypropylene carpets. The said notice related
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...
Supreme Court of India
May-03-2023
Land Acquisition
Hair Oil' which was classified by them under Tariff Item No.3003 9014 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. However, as per Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, preparations for use on the hair … ‘medicament’ or under Chapter 33 as ‘cosmetic’, one of the essential features would be as to whether the 53 preparation is essentially for cure or prevention of disease (medicament) or for care (cosmetic); and the preparation having
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Rayon and Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jan-31-2002
Excise
(2002)(81)ECC515
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »