Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 50 · Page 1 of about 1,800 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 23 2008

Bakelite Hylam Ltd. Rep. by Manager-taxation Vs. the Customs, Excise a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-23-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 11, 11A, 11A(1), 11AC and 35B; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2), 173Q and 226; Finance Act, 2000 ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : 2008(161)LC183(Madras)

Excise Act, 1944, is the charging Section in terms of which duties specified, under the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, is levied on various excisable goods manufactured in India at the rates set forth in the Schedule to … full description of the excisable goods produced or manufactured or to be produced or manufactured by them, the chapter heading and the sub-heading of the Tariff Act under which such goods would fall, the rate of duty … 39.13 in Volatile Organic Solvent, when the weight of the solvent exceeds 50% of the weight of the solution, should be classified under Chapter-32. Since

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2000

Bamni Proteins Limited Vs. Ajay (Shri)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2000

Subject : Contempt of CourtExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR744

to why the Di-Calcium Phosphate (Animal Feed Grade) should not be classified under Chapter Sub-heading No. 2835.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, attracting Central Excise Duty @ 6 per cent ad valorem and why the Central Excise Duty to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2009

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-i Vs. Champdany Indust ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 2A and 14A; Sales Tax Acts; Interpretative Rules - Rules 1 and 3

Reported in : 2009(169)LC51(SC); 2009(241)ELT481(SC); JT2009(12)SC156; 2009(12)SCALE317; (2009)9SCC466:2009AIRSCW6039

entirely of polypropylene and therefore, as per Note 1 of Chapter 57 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 those carpets cannot be classified as jute carpets but are classifiable as polypropylene carpets. The said notice related … jute predominates by weight over each other single textile material and the percentage of jute was more than 50%. This also appears from the adjudication order of the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Bhubaneswar.8. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 18 2000

Graphic Charts Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-2000

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(94)LC762Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1998

Shri Krishna Polyurethane Ind. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-1998

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(102)ELT162TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2019

Dinesh Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Servic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2019

Subject : MRTP

The Appellants are traders who get cotton fabrics and made-ups mentioned in Chapters 52 and 53 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (the ‘Tariff Act’, for short) manufactured through job workers.3. On 25.03.2003 Rule 12B was inserted in Central Excise … an export-oriented unit or a unit located in special economic zone) who gets 2[yarns or fabrics falling under Chapter 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 58 or 60, readymade garments falling under Chapter 61 or 62 or made

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2016

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

dated 1st March, 2006. 12. Simultaneously, the rate of basic excise duty leviable on such tobacco products under Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, was suitably increased with no change in total excise duty. … masala not containing tobacco under the brand name Star Pan Masala classifiable under Tariff Heading 21069020 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The petitioner claims that it has discharged its VAT liability of 12.5% on the sale of such pan … Years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 when the ADE Act was covering these products. 50. Mr. Sridharan emphasizes that the Notification, in any event, can be effective

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2000

Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-04-2000

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 37B; Customs Act - Sections 12; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3 and 3(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act; Central Excise Rules - Rules 3, 43(1) and 174

Reported in : 2001(74)ECC296; 2001(131)ELT535(Guj)

manufactured product, but also those processes as are specified in relation to any goods in the section or chapter notes of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 are also brought within the ambit of … which it was clarified that 'coal-ash (cinder)' is an excisable commodity classifiable under sub-heading No. 2621.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and chargeable to appropriate rate of duty. According to the Board coal-ash (cinder) was specified in the Schedule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2003

D.P. Lon Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 173, 173F, 173Q, 173Q(1) and 174

Reported in : AIR2003SC1399; 2003(86)ECC521; 2003(153)ELT269(SC); JT2003(3)SC258; 2003(3)SCALE378; (2003)5SCC97; [2003]2SCR1125; [2003]132STC525(SC)

22.5.1986, the doubled and/or multifold yarns falling under Chapter 54 or Chapter 55 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 were wholly exempted from the duty of excise leviable thereon, provided such doubled or multifolded yarns were manufactured … Tariff and, therefore, confirmed the demand of duty of central excise of Rs. 5,63,066.40 and penalty of Rs. 50,000/-.7. The present appeal was filed by the appellant in this Court on the basis that the Full Bench

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2005

D.C.L. Polyster Ltd., Nagpur Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Custo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-2005

Subject : ExciseLimitation

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 7 and 9; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 3, 9, 49, 52A and 276

Reported in : 2005(99)ECC137; 2005(181)ELT190(SC); JT2005(2)SC486; (2005)3SCC455

chapter heading 39.15 (waste) or whether it is classifiable under chapter heading 39.07 (Primary Form of Plastic) of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as 'the 1985 Act') as contended by the department.2. DCL … products specified in headings 39.01 to 39.13 in volatile organic solvents, when the weight of the solvent exceed 50% of the weight of the solution, are excluded from this Chapter and fall in heading 32.08. (see Note

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial