Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Customs (General), New Delhi Vs. Gujarat Perstorp Elec ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1), 28(1), 111 and 112; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32, 43 and 43(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Interpretation Rules, 1988

Reported in : 2005(101)ECC577; 2005(186)ELT532(SC); JT2005(7)SC490; (2005)7SCC118

reference to the nomenclature indicated by the HSN unless there be an express different intention indicated by the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 itself. The definition of a term in the ISI Glossary, which has a different purpose, cannot in case … Tariff?(iii) Whether goods, as described in (a) & (b) above, can be considered as 'Printed Book' classifiable under Chapter 49 of the Customs Tariff in order to avail the benefit of Notification Nos. 107/93-Cus and 38/94-Cus?'17. It was

Gopal Zarda Udyog Etc. Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise, New Del ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6, 11A(1) and 14; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 174; ;Excise Law

Reported in : AIR2005SC4243; 2005(102)ECC513; 2005(188)ELT251(SC); JT2005(12)SC119; 2005(8)SCALE26; (2005)8SCC157

the 'additive mixture' processed by the three appellants herein was excisable and classifiable under chapter sub-heading 2404.49 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and that the department was right in invoking the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2000)(0)ELT00TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Orissa Cement Ltd. and anr. and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 49, 52A, 173B, 173C and 173G

Reported in : 1995(51)ECC90; 1995(80)ELT255(Ori); 1995(II)OLR318

Matched in: Advocate G. Rath and A. Parija A.B. Mishra, Sr. Standing Counsel (Central)

Rajasthan Spg. and Wvg. Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 49; Central Excise Rules - Rule 9(1)

Reported in : AIR2003SC1162; 2003(85)ECC710; 2003(152)ELT32(SC); JT2003(1)SC510; 2003(1)SCALE548; (2003)2SCC436

the appellants.8. Following the said judgments of this Court in Bhilwara and Banswara (supra), these appeals are dismissed. Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 Chapter 55 -Tariff headings 18-III/18-E/22- Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 49 - Central Excise Rules, 1944- Rule 9(1)

The Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi Vs. Hari Chand Shri Gopa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 9, 47, 49A(1), 52A, 54, 57G, 57T, 173B, 173B(1), 173FF, 173G, 173G(1), 173G(3), 173K, 174, 174(1), 174A, 192, 196, 196(1) and 224(1); ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11A and 14; ;Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1); ;Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 233B; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 116 and 161

Reported in : AIR2005SC3595; 2005(102)ECC481; 2005(188)ELT353(SC); JT2005(12)SC189; 2005(8)SCALE58; (2005)8SCC164

judgment in civil appeal nos.5747-5749 of 2000 that this kimam was excisable and classifiable under sub-heading 2404.49/2404.40 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Admittedly, the existence of assessees' units in Delhi, where kimam was manufactured, was not disclosed to the department, … law involved in this matter is - whether irrespective of the assessees having not followed or substantially followed Chapter X procedure under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, they would still be entitled to the benefit of notification

Raymond Limited, Under Companies Act, 1956 and Mr. Vasant Naag of Navi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A(1); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Cenvat Credit Rules

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR174; 2009(111)BomLR2444; 2009(167)LC7(Bombay); 2009(240)ELT180(Bom)

who manufactures goods falling under Tariff Heading 55.06 from duty paid inputs falling under Heading 55.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('CET' for short) is entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 30/2004 dated 9/7/2004 is the basic question … process known as the `tow to top process'.6. Excise duty payable on various textile goods are enumerated in Chapters 50 to 63 of the CET. Chapter 55 of the CET with which we are concerned in the

Shantilal Doshi Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1991)LC397Tri(Delhi)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

M/S. Jyoti Overseas Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(75)ECC826

will be excluded from Chapter 52 and deserves to go to Chapter 59." 5. Section XI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 relates to textiles and textile articles. Chapter 50 to 63 fall under this Section. Note 6(a) to Section

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Hair Oil' which was classified by them under Tariff Item No.3003 9014 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. However, as per Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, preparations for use on the hair … are of the view that they are also properly classifiable under medicaments under Tariff Sub-Heading 3003.30.” (emphasis supplied) 49 16. Apart from the above, on behalf of the respondent, reference has also been made to a decision